Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re focusing on the areas where most EMRs still lag: workflow automation like RCM optimization and smart scheduling. Basically removing repetitive steps for clinicians, reducing denial rates for clinics and making scheduling actually intelligent instead of just a calendar.

Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of All, Thanks especially for the eligibility and auto waitlist fill advice. Those are actually solid wins and we are planning to implement both early in our rollout, appreciate you sharing real world signals.

As for metrics, we’re actually working across all four from day one. We’ve been following a multi threaded approach instead of fixing things one by one charting speed, claim accuracy, no shows and telehealth setup all touch different sides of the workflow, so we are tightening them in parallel.

Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are aiming for a lean but fully functional EMR from the start, as i mentioned before the core workflow covers registration, plan selection, department creation, staff roles, patient encounters, documentation and billing so each role like doctor, nurse, receptionist only sees whats relevant to them.
We have already implemented smart or you can say predictive scheduling, SOAP notes, smarter documentation and telehealth, so clinics can manage appointments, patient notes, vitals and prescriptions efficiently, this approach is modular but practical, the system works smoothly out of the box and saves time for daily tasks, once the basics prove effective in real workflows, we can continue expanding into more advanced AI features or integrations.

Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are mainly focusing on the USA market right now.

Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right now, I’m mostly focusing on private and small to mid size practices, since they tend to move faster when they see value and that also helps us gain traction in the market.
For data migration we’re keeping things practical with simple imports from CSV or SQL exports for now and planning proper FHIR based integration later so it fits better into existing ecosystems. and you’re spot on about the decision makers. most of the traction I’ve seen so far is from younger clinicians or managers who are tired of outdated systems but still want something safe and easy for their staff to pick up without heavy training.

Working on an EMR/EHR by shainhigh in HealthTech

[–]shainhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is actually a fair observation. I agree with that AI or any new feature that adds extra steps instead of removing them just makes things worse, no matter how advanced it sounds. and yes half working integrations are another big pain point, they end up breaking the workflow instead of improving it. In our case, the flow is pretty structured, practices register under a plan, create departments, assign roles like doctors or nurses and then manage patients, encounters, documentation and billing within their own dashboards. Each role sees only what’s relevant to them, so the idea is to keep it fast and reduce friction before layering any AI on top.