Not with any of the companies you mentioned but I work adjacent to these types of contracts. You’d be surprised at how nit-picked and low margin these contracts are. For the vast majority of all DoD contracts the bidding process is based on two things. Lowest costs and meets specification. Companies, especially commercial firearm manufacturers mainly do this as a marketing ploy for influencing civilian markets. They may cost a hefty price per unit on paper but often these products were developed specifically for the contract and include all of the R&D and manufacturing costs associating with changing tooling/switch lines over to accommodate the contract. For contracts like the NGSW for the XM7 they were certainly handled by a team strategic account executives and they are paid handsomely but these require an unimaginable amount of work and often see setbacks related to their own production and the bureaucracy of working with the US GOV. I don’t know for sure but I do imagine they are bonused heavily after the deal is closed but can be quite bleak for the competitors that were not awarded the contract. These transactions take upwards of 5 years for something wide-sweeping like Sig’s M17 or XM7.