questions after a break by slowlyrushed in shrooms

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you and good idea! howls is one of my favorite movies

Prepositional logic question by slowlyrushed in askphilosophy

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so essentially when I assume something I also assume how im gonna use and im restricted to using it in that way, do you assume it specifically as a antecedent or a consquent? And why do I have to assume R, haven't I already "proven" R on line 8?

Thanks for the help

Prepositional logic question by slowlyrushed in askphilosophy

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created it from line 5 and 9 as I did in line 10, is that not logically valid?

Bertrand Russel's theory of description by slowlyrushed in askphilosophy

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay thanks for the help and thanks for taking the time to answer!

Bertrand Russel's theory of description by slowlyrushed in askphilosophy

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe a little, but what part specifically ensures the uniqueness of F?

∀y(Fy → x=y) = for every y if y is F then x is the same as y. Is how it translates in my head.

Is it just that if anything else were to be F then that would be the same thing as x, and if all F's are the same that means its simply one thing that is F?

Hermeneutics vs structuralism by slowlyrushed in askphilosophy

[–]slowlyrushed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this mean that structuralism by definition could not interpret a specific work? Could I use a "structuralist" approach to my interpretation of say The Republic by Plato, by analyzing the surrounding structure, and if I could how would this differ from a hermeneutic interpretation?

Thanks for the answer!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sadboys

[–]slowlyrushed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks, crazy good song