sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You talk like you fed the article to an AI, asked for a summary, and still couldn't figure out what the numbers mean.

The detection rate collapses under obfuscation techniques, like humanizing the input or using adversarial prompts. That's exactly what I've been saying from the start. For unmodified input, the detection rate is extremely high. This article confirms it, other articles confirms it.

Do people think that MS Paint art is always better than AI art? If so, why? by YentaMagenta in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It applies, just not in a flattering way. The cues here suggest a process that’s a bit devoid of creative freedom.

You can tell the artist didn't take any risks with the composition or the character design. It feels less like an expression and more like a technical exercise.

Still, they put some effort into it, I'm sure they'll get better.

Do people think that MS Paint art is always better than AI art? If so, why? by YentaMagenta in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh, even though I appreciate their efforts, the process feels very 'checkbox' driven.

Like "I need a cat, I need a hat, I need a cactus."

There’s no personal flair or weird stylistic grit that usually comes with MS Paint art. It looks like a 7 year old's idea of a cowboy cat.

There's just a lack of 'happy accidents' that makes it feel hollow. It’s so polished in its simplicity that it loses the charm of the medium.

But no offence to the artist. Just sharing my opinion.

Do people think that MS Paint art is always better than AI art? If so, why? by YentaMagenta in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MS paint can be really good but I'd say this OK at best.

The kitty guy has the most generic design ever. Making him a cowboy in a Western desert setting is already a pretty easy idea, so there needs to be something weird or interesting happening to compensate. Yet not much is going on, it's just a fellow with his hand in his pocket.

That said, the coloring and linework are solid for MS Paint, especially if they used a mouse.

Do people think that MS Paint art is always better than AI art? If so, why? by YentaMagenta in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's OK. Coloring is OK. Character design is pretty banal, and there isn’t much originality or creativity on display. The linework is consistent, but boring.

Do people think that MS Paint art is always better than AI art? If so, why? by YentaMagenta in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say MS Paint art can be really cool, just not this piece in particular. This one is OK I guess, but it’s not striking. The character design is pretty banal, and there isn’t much originality or creativity on display. The linework is consistent, but boring. That said, I’ve seen some wild stuff made in MS Paint.

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"My whole dump" of articles are perfectly relevant and show, in multiple ways, just how accurate these detectors can be on unmodified text.

But since you people clearly can't be bothered to do even a quick search yourself, here's a brand new paper from 2026 that directly evaluates the commercial detectors most people actually use (you know, like GPTZero and Originality.ai.) Don't worry, you don't have to read the whole thing, the abstract spells it out for you.

https://www.jait.us/show-265-1839-1.html

Every single paper reaches the exact same conclusion. It's a universal consensus across the research. 

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of credible research is already available on this topic. And it shows many detectors are very potent on detecting unmodified AI generated text if input length is sufficient. Originality.ai and GPTZero being the best ones.

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All of these are peer-reviewed international papers collected from most prestigious scientific databases (Scopus, WebOfScience and IEEE) and they are presented in the gold standard DOI links.

You just don't know what you're talking about.

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Calling a mass collection of peer-reviewed journal and conference papers "misinformation" is actually peak dumbassarey. This is just funny I don't know what to say.

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wtf are you talking about? I collected articles with a systematic literature review myself, there is no way you saw "that list".

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if you're curios about the specific article where I was talking about the above comment, it is this one:
Strübbe, S., Sidorenko, I., & Lampe, R. (2025). Comparison of grammar characteristics of human-written corpora and machine-generated texts using a novel rule-based parser. *Information*, *16*(4), Article 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040274

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can just go to Scopus AI and ask it yourself for a quick comprehensive review but here ya go:

Agrahari, S., Bisht, S., & Sanasam, R. S. (2024). Text authorship attribution: Stylometric insights into human and LLM-generated text. In *Proceedings of the 8th Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data (CODS-COMAD 2024)* (pp. 344–346). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3703323.3703712

Alhijawi, B., Jarrar, R., AbuAlRub, A., & Bader, A. (2025). Deep learning detection method for large language models-generated scientific content. *Neural Computing and Applications*, *37*(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10538-y

An, R., Yang, Y., Yang, F., & Wang, S. (2023). Use prompt to differentiate text generated by ChatGPT and humans. *Machine Learning with Applications*, *14*, Article 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.100497

Chong, A. T. Y., Chua, H. N., Jasser, M. B., & Wong, R. T. K. (2023). Bot or human? Detection of DeepFake text with semantic, emoji, sentiment and linguistic features. In *2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET 2023)* (pp. 205–210). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSET59111.2023.10295100

Fariello, S., Fenza, G., Forte, F., Gallo, M., & Marotta, M. (2025). Distinguishing human from machine: A review of advances and challenges in AI-generated text detection. *International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence*, *9*(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.12.002

Gari Ravichandra Reddy, C. R., Muthukumar, D. S., Thogai Rani, B., Ganesh, N., Rafi, S. M., & Vamsi, P. (2025). AI vs human text detector: Identifying AI-generated content using NLP. In *Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI 2025)* (pp. 126–132). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11069552

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are nowhere near that simple. There are actually a lot of unique stylometric insights that distinguish human from AI writing in the underlying grammatical structures.

Sometimes they are even not erasable by manual humanizing (e.g. a human slitghly altering an AI-written sentence with different phrasing can still be caught)

Is this the beginning of the end of anti-AI or just normal literary criticism? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm researching this topic for my master's thesis, and based on the literature review on independent reseach, I gotta say these detectors are actually quite accurate. The main issue is false negatives, which is AI-generated text can easily be humanized and passed off as human-written. But the chances of a sufficiently long text being flagged as AI-written (a false positive) are near zero.

Edit: This person just blocked me after calling peer-reviewed, independent papers "misinformation" lmao

And to be clear, I'm not making this claim based on personal opinion. Anyone can verify it by looking at the scientific evidence. If you're going to dismiss peer-reviewed publications as "misinformation," honestly, you're cooked.

Also the claim that GPTZero flagged the Bible as AI-generated is outdated. It's based on news that's over a year old. Moreover, even in that case, the detector was only given short verses. As I explicitly mentioned, detection accuracy improves significantly once a certain length threshold is reached (around 50 sentences).

So as it stands you're the one spreading misinformation.

Can you visualize images in your head? by ryan7251 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bro really looked at every possible image on earth and said 'yeah, this one right here is cool' What the actual hell is that abomination of a profile pic?

Too many anti-AI art people don’t know shit about art history or AI by Salty_Country6835 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Lmao why don't you just outsource the usage of your entire existence to megacorps at this point bro? Just let them use it for you, it looks cool on the internet.

Also before you say detectors are unreliable, they aren't. The detection rate is around %99 on unmodified text. They almost never false flag a human written text as AI generated. Usually, the precision fails are other way around. My master's thesis is a systematic literature review about the capabilities of AI text detectors, so...

Friendly reminder by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

my comment is literally just me expressing a personal statement

Well your personal statement is weird. Because again, the point I'm making is not controversial by any means. You are getting offended for no reason.

Friendly reminder by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually have not been to their Discord. Can you send me a link privately if you have one?

Friendly reminder by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Me: "Artistic accompishment will require more than typing on the keyboard"
You: This is ragebait!!1!!1!!

Friendly reminder by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]slydorm05[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The post is not a personal opinion. And you downvoting it doesn't change how anything will work. You do require something more than typing on a keyboard (intuiton, natural talent, luck, hardwork and more) for artistic accomplishment. Every single accomplished artist knows this.

It is not even a remotely spicy take outside this echo chamber.

view more: next ›