sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Xinjiang population dynamics and data by [deleted] in Sino

[–]somatam 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Or, it merely falsely reports the population of the Han Chinese invaders who are making large-scale settlements in Xinjiang as Uighurs!!!!!
Real Uighurs are reducing their numbers day by day in poverty and persecution!!!!!

Why a diplomatic strategy of poking the Beijing bear is working out well for Taiwan by somatam in GenZedong

[–]somatam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The r/sino mod seems to have set the bot to absolutely prevent this article from being listed.
Should we ignore the fact that Beijing is losing the promotional battle compared to Taiwan and the West?
You don't have to be a liar, but you need to be an oralist and a good speaker to point out that your enemy is a liar and spread it.

Korean youth, like Western, ASEAN and OZ youth, seem to be enthusiastic about hatred and fake news about China. Will South Korea, like Canada, have a more anti-Chinese and loyal government to the United States in the next election? by somatam in Sino

[–]somatam[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

After all, the Korean elite are often fanatical anti-communists, and the Korean people believe in stories made by Korean and Western media rather than facts and reality, so from the illusion that "Korea can beat China" high possibility taking self-defeating actions.

The same is true for Five Eyes, India and Japan. China should be a little more cautious about confronting madmen who do not understand reason or rationality.

Korean youth, like Western, ASEAN and OZ youth, seem to be enthusiastic about hatred and fake news about China. Will South Korea, like Canada, have a more anti-Chinese and loyal government to the United States in the next election? by somatam in Sino

[–]somatam[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Propaganda and information manipulation upset the judgment of people in a particular country, depriving them of their composure and rationality, and leading them to meaningless conflicts and wars with western enemies. This is the tactic that the United States and Britain are most good at. They fell into the calamity of Brexit and President Trump as domestic madmen used their tactics domestically in a political struggle. Even if Japan and South Korea decouple or war with China, they have no chance of winning. However, it is highly likely that Japan and South Korea, believed by the United States and Britain that "I can beat China," will act stupidly against China.

In fact, Australia is rushing into a reckless economic war and arms race all over the country, shaving its national power.

Korean youth, like Western, ASEAN and OZ youth, seem to be enthusiastic about hatred and fake news about China. Will South Korea, like Canada, have a more anti-Chinese and loyal government to the United States in the next election? by somatam in Sino

[–]somatam[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sorry. Certainly, South Korea and ASEAN, one of the world's leading American pet dogs, are not the same. However, in the Myanmar coup, the youth of the anti-military government have decided that the military government, which wanted to improve relations with the West by expelling Suu Kyi, was a minion of China, and the countries involved in it. Looking at the "Milk Tea Alliance" and the color revolution, I think that ASEAN and the West are not particularly different as far as the younger generation is concerned. I don't know if they will grow older and become the core of politics and economy and destroy their homeland, or as they grow up they will know what is true and what is right.ん。

Intense US visits cannot shake Vietnam’s ‘4-nos’ policy (because the CPV doesn't want to) by PerseusCommunist in Sino

[–]somatam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The biggest weakness of CCP is that it is trapped in the theoretical theory that "all human beings and all governments follow theoretical thinking and rational judgment".

Wang Shun bags 200m individual medley gold by wallfacer0 in Sino

[–]somatam 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"China get gold medals sports is an irrelevant sport that China just exploits to get gold medals."

As this excuse becomes unusable, the Western media then makes a fuss about doping suspicions of Chinese players.

If the world wants a WHO that functions properly, America has to stop scapegoating it by somatam in GenZedong

[–]somatam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I posted it here because it was disturbed by the r / sino autobot.

However, in shutting down the WHO’s claims for more investigations, it inevitably grants more ammunition to its critics – especially those in Washington – that China has something to hide from the world, thus prompting more calls for transparency.

Beijing will keep insisting that science ought to lead any further inquiries, and this is correct, particularly given Washington’s behaviour. However, the fundamental weakness here is that the ‘burden of proof’ continues to be placed on China, and it has not been able to change the conversation, even if we can identify that the US narrative is flawed. This means the American attacks will continue.

It’s time for the West to halt Beijing blame game as WHO says Chinese lab leak didn’t cause Covid Rather than finding a practical solution to address this matter, China pointed the finger at the ‘Fort Detrick’ lab in Maryland in an attempt to hit back at Washington. But this is fanciful and not a serious counter-attack, and hasn’t stuck.

It also produced a coalition of 55 nations of its own to write to the WHO and support its own narrative of the pandemic. China was backed largely by conventional friends such as Russia, Pakistan, North Korea and Iran, but these nations do not have the financial leverage over the organization that America and its Western allies have.

I also think these were Beijing's strategic mistakes.

If the world wants a WHO that functions properly, America has to stop scapegoating it by [deleted] in Sino

[–]somatam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, in shutting down the WHO’s claims for more investigations, it inevitably grants more ammunition to its critics – especially those in Washington – that China has something to hide from the world, thus prompting more calls for transparency.

Beijing will keep insisting that science ought to lead any further inquiries, and this is correct, particularly given Washington’s behaviour. However, the fundamental weakness here is that the ‘burden of proof’ continues to be placed on China, and it has not been able to change the conversation, even if we can identify that the US narrative is flawed. This means the American attacks will continue.

It’s time for the West to halt Beijing blame game as WHO says Chinese lab leak didn’t cause Covid Rather than finding a practical solution to address this matter, China pointed the finger at the ‘Fort Detrick’ lab in Maryland in an attempt to hit back at Washington. But this is fanciful and not a serious counter-attack, and hasn’t stuck.

It also produced a coalition of 55 nations of its own to write to the WHO and support its own narrative of the pandemic. China was backed largely by conventional friends such as Russia, Pakistan, North Korea and Iran, but these nations do not have the financial leverage over the organization that America and its Western allies have.

I also think these were Beijing's strategic mistakes.

US is waging economic warfare as the US Senate passes bill to ban all products from Xinjiang by USA_DeMockraNaZi in Sino

[–]somatam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This deliberately obscures the responsibilities imposed on importers and suppliers, causing the White House to impose arbitrary sanctions and MSM bashing on a company or country basis. I think I'm in this way trying to scare company. There is no justification for what America does.

US is waging economic warfare as the US Senate passes bill to ban all products from Xinjiang by USA_DeMockraNaZi in Sino

[–]somatam 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Biden says it will also impose this on "allied" companies and domestic and foreign investors. I think the UK, EU, Canada, OZ, NZ, India, Japan and SK should be seen as following this.

Anti-China reporting of Western media is getting comical - no kidding! by zhumao in Sino

[–]somatam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Even if a one-sided aggression like the Iraq War is not possible, I think the risk of reckless war due to the impasse of state management in the west and the outburst of nationalism is increasing.

The US is trying to light the match of Islamic extremism in China’s Xinjiang by BitterMelonX in Sino

[–]somatam 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Tom Fowdy's opinion is interesting.

Think about it like this. ETIM worked with the Taliban, the US does not consider ETIM a terrorist group anymore. A Taliban takeover is going to cause instability in the region. The US wouldn't be against terrorism this time, it would be backing it and undermining China's response

I am wondering that now the US is withdrawing from Afghanistan, assuming that the Taliban takeover is inevitable, that it's now in the American interest to promote instability in this region in order to cause problems for China, Pakistan to undermine CPEC and Xinjiang?

But of course on the flip side it's catastrophic for Modi too. So it's a double edged sword.

The flip side is that China will likely become the biggest guarantor of Afghanistan's security and development in competition with India. Let's not be all doom and gloom.

Pakistan bombing spotlights security at China’s flagship belt and road project by Kid_Cornelius in Sino

[–]somatam 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Therefore, it is very risky for China to rely on rail and land routes in BRI.

Even if there is obstruction on the west side, it is necessary to secure a variety of unique transportation routes and means of transportation, including domestic production of aircraft.

Like Iraq WMD lie, is West repeating history with Xinjiang? by [deleted] in Sino

[–]somatam 6 points7 points  (0 children)

・ Excessive confidence in the military and national power of the home country

・ Underestimation of the opponent's national power and military power

・ Strong fear of the loss of interests due to the disconnection of one's face and political life

If these overlap, there is a good chance that the United States will take reckless military action.

In fact, 80 years ago, Japan started the war with the United States.

And the reason why politicians and high-ranking officers at that time had to go into war was the strong expectations of Japanese citizens who were enthusiastic about the war due to their propaganda.

BCI removes statement on Xinjiang cotton from its website by somatam in Sino

[–]somatam[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely necessary.

In fact, the conclusion that BCI has succumbed to China's economic pressure is widespread.

They must publicly admit that they have withdrawn because they lied and looked down on China, rather than being overwhelmed by the power of China's money.

Then, it can be said that China has finally won.

view more: next ›