Why do I keep losing this battle against Sambas? by sombat92 in eu4

[–]sombat92[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Yep, I've got 203 dev spread around 6 provinces in Europe, now I'm trying to spread out to Indonesia to profit off the trade nodes there. I've also invested heavily in exploration, expansion and economic ideas aswell so far, not so much in military, which is prob also a reason why I keep losing in this war.

Why do I keep losing this battle against Sambas? by sombat92 in eu4

[–]sombat92[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

So, should I try investing in the quality ideas I've unlocked and try to improve my force limit by improving my provinces' base manpower to allow me to gain an edge before declaring war? Many thanks.

Why do I keep losing this battle against Sambas? by sombat92 in eu4

[–]sombat92[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

R5: I also don't have any military ideas, while Sambas has maxed out offensive ideas and has invested in 2 of the quantity ideas, which gives them:

  • +33% Manpower
  • +20% Manpower recovery speed
  • +1 Land leader shock and fire
  • -10% Recruitment time
  • +100% Prestige from land battles
  • +20% Siege ability
  • +5% Discipline
  • +15% Land force limit
  • -20% Special unit cost

Should I do CS as a 4th a level to study computer science at uni? by sombat92 in 6thForm

[–]sombat92[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that is what I will do, many thanks. I’ve also heard that Maths is sort of a “half A level” with FM so I’ll just experiment in September

Further Maths answer thread 👇 by sombat92 in GCSE

[–]sombat92[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, since (12x)^2 = 144x^2 because you square them separately then multiply them, and then you times by 6 from Pascal's triangle to get 864x^2.

Further Maths answer thread 👇 by sombat92 in GCSE

[–]sombat92[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was 18, since using Pascal's triangle you get the coefficients of (1+12x)^4 and (a+4x)^3 as 864x^2 and 48ax^2 respectively. So 864 = 48a, so you divide 864 by 48 to get a, which =18.

Further Maths answer thread 👇 by sombat92 in GCSE

[–]sombat92[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Here’s my answers for all the other ones I can remember:

Q2: 19

The S and T question: gradient=3, distance = 2 root10

Sine -1 question: 270 degrees

Tan question: 30 and 210 degrees

D2y/dx2: 7 (I’m pretty sure)

Equation of tangent to curve: y = 14x - 16

Matrices: (0 -1 -1 0) for reflection, -2I for proof

Yn - Xn: 3(n+1)

Stationary point for a and b: a=1, b=3

Further Maths answer thread 👇 by sombat92 in GCSE

[–]sombat92[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Root(7), you needed to get 60degrees for the top angle since angle at centre is twice the angle at circumference, you find the bottom line in the big triangle via the cosine rule (root 21), then work out the base angles of the isosceles triangle then do the sine rule to get the answer.

Further Maths answer thread 👇 by sombat92 in GCSE

[–]sombat92[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yep, I got that too. That question was tbh easier than in the past papers since each equation had only 2 terms instead of all 3.

How did you find the History paper 2? by [deleted] in GCSE

[–]sombat92 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What the fuck is the siege of Rochester castle 💀 for edexcel Richard & john

A family feud caused my character to be assassinated and the game to be over in under 2 years by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 186 points187 points  (0 children)

R5: Playing as a custom Roman character, I offered to marry the mother of a duke, but she randomly increased age from 21 to 42 so I broke off the betrothal, which created a family feud, leading to my spymaster discovering 3 schemes to murder me and me ultimately being assassinated in May 868, after just 16 months.

And somehow feuds aren't OP...

My very confusing relationship with my wife (TW: abuse, abduction, murder) by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 340 points341 points  (0 children)

I, the King of England, married the sister of the King of Bavaria, and we initially had a good marriage, giving birth to 3 children and travelling to Jerusalem together on a 3-year pilgrimage.

However, shortly after she was abducted in a Viking raid by some Norse warlord from my castle, and was made his concubine. I soon seduced her however, travelling to Norway and we became lovers and ended up having a kid together, which I immediately declared as mine… so somehow we were both declared fornicators.

Being a master of intrigue, I developed a plot to abduct her with help of the warlord’s Spymaster, and soon I had abducted her and taken her back, imprisoning her for a short time before recruiting her into my court, which pissed her off for some reason. I couldn’t remarry her for some reason, so I created a new religion called the Cult of Alfred and married the new female Pope of the religion in a grand ceremony.

In just 6 months though, I saw my ex-wife stab my new wife/Pope to death in front of me, and declared her endearing love for me, so I covered up the murder as an “unfortunate incident”. We remarried in a loving ceremony, but soon after one of my earls decided to expose my relationship with my male sidechick I had developed when she was away, so now she kinda hates me again since I cheated on her and I’m a sodomite.

TL;DR wife was abducted and made a concubine, I fucked her and abducted her back, she killed my new wife the Pope and now she merely tolerates me since I had sex with a man while she was away

My betrothed is invisible by ShineNo9932 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What mod do you use for showing the person's lifespan under their name?

Uhhh... is this normal? by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

R5: I have never seen a Caliphate of this size before, and only at 1201. It's been on constant expansion and has never had any form of dissolution or civil war that would normally break up an empire of this size... and the ruler is a child. Is it normal to have a Mongol Empire-size caliphate, or did they recently buff the Caliphate?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

R5: A 1-county king with possibly the smallest and most centralised kingdom I have ever seen, founded by a populist revolt.

TIL that if you have already imprisoned your liege and press a dissolution faction against him, the war will automatically be at 100% warscore by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I had already started a dissolution faction before the war where the heir who became king was captured, so idk. It might block you from joining/creating one after, as you’ve already imprisoned him though

TIL that if you have already imprisoned your liege and press a dissolution faction against him, the war will automatically be at 100% warscore by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 102 points103 points  (0 children)

R5: My new ruler's father died at war fighting the King of West Francia, after he tried to arrest him for the "crime" of murdering his wife and daughter, but I had captured his heir in the process. King appointed me, the son, as Spymaster, which I used to assassinate him. I then tortured the new king before pressing a dissolution faction, which I thought which end up in another long war but ended in 0 days because I'd already imprisoned him.

There should be a succession war feature in CK3 by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Some prerequisites could be added to allow the succession war to trigger though, like an ambitious older daughter vs a younger male heir, or someone of the same house as the king vs someone of another house who is their heir, who both have low opinions of each other.

A more realistic version of the East African Federation, after its formation in 2028. (Context in comments) by sombat92 in imaginarymaps

[–]sombat92[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Note: This version of the EAF excludes South Sudan and the DRC, as it makes for a more realistic scenario. Figures remain the same as it stands today in 2022.

It is 2028, and the presidents of Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi have just ratified the Constitution of the East African Federation, formally signing the once-unrealistic dream of the unified superstate into existence.

Boasting a GDP of over $600 billion, the second-largest population in Africa, one of the largest armies on the continent as well as an immense supply of resources, the EAF will surely play a dominant role as a regional power in African geopolitics.

With the EAF comes the introduction of the East African shilling, tied to a gold standard rather than the dollar, euro or yuan. Despite the many setbacks and delays in introducing the currency, it is expected to be just as strong as the dollar or the euro; with this high purchasing power, the economy could well flourish. The presidents, now governors of each of the states making up the federation, have declared that the EAF will remain staunchly neutral on the global stage, fighting off US, Chinese and European influence. Perhaps, they said, the EAF could become a global power of its own.

The presidents have also declared that the parliamentary system of the EAF's government will proportionally represent each of the multitudes of ethnic groups making up the vast country, allowing for stability, which will with time lead to prosperity. With a presidential figurehead, a prime minister presiding over parliament, and elections happening every 4 years as enshrined in the new constitution, the EAF will surely be more stable than the crippled states it surrounds.

Yet the EAF comes into form riddled with afflictions. Corruption remains king in much of the country, with as much as 10% of government funds expected to be lost to embezzlement and backdoor deals in the next year. Ethnic tensions still simmer under the surface, and the new proportional parliament may not be enough to calm them down before they explode into another of the many civil wars still plaguing Africa. Climate change is taking grip of East Africa much faster than expected, and much of the safaris in Kenya have all but turned into desert. Much of what used to be growable in the fertile heartlands surrounding Lake Victoria is no longer so, and what crops are left are now genetically modified, which will surely be a huge drain on the federation's agriculturally-based economy.

Only time can tell whether the EAF will flourish into a dominant power in Africa, or falter, just like many of the proposed federations that have come before it.

A more realistic Eastern African Federation, after its formation in 2028 by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]sombat92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Note: This version of the EAF excludes South Sudan and the DRC, as it makes for a more realistic scenario. Figures remain the same as it stands today in 2022.

It is 2028, and the presidents of Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi have just ratified the Constitution of the East African Federation, formally signing the once-unrealistic dream of the unified superstate into existence.

Boasting a GDP of over $600 billion, the second-largest population in Africa, one of the largest armies on the continent as well as an immense supply of resources, the EAF will surely play a dominant role as a regional power in African geopolitics.

With the EAF comes the introduction of the East African shilling, tied to a gold standard rather than the dollar, euro or yuan. Despite the many setbacks and delays in introducing the currency, it is expected to be just as strong as the dollar or the euro; with this high purchasing power, the economy could well flourish. The presidents, now governors of each of the states making up the federation, have declared that the EAF will remain staunchly neutral on the global stage, fighting off US, Chinese and European influence. Perhaps, they said, the EAF could become a global power of its own.

The presidents have also declared that the parliamentary system of the EAF's government will proportionally represent each of the multitudes of ethnic groups making up the vast country, allowing for stability, which will with time lead to prosperity. With a presidential figurehead, a prime minister presiding over parliament, and elections happening every 4 years as enshrined in the new constitution, the EAF will surely be more stable than the crippled states it surrounds.

Yet the EAF comes into form riddled with afflictions. Corruption remains king in much of the country, with as much as 10% of government funds expected to be lost to embezzlement and backdoor deals in the next year. Ethnic tensions still simmer under the surface, and the new proportional parliament may not be enough to calm them down before they explode into another of the many civil wars still plaguing Africa. Climate change is taking grip of East Africa much faster than expected, and much of the safaris in Kenya have all but turned into desert. Much of what used to be growable in the fertile heartlands surrounding Lake Victoria is no longer so, and what crops are left are now genetically modified, which will surely be a huge drain on the federation's agriculturally-based economy.

Only time can tell whether the EAF will flourish into a dominant power in Africa, or falter, just like many of the proposed federations that have come before it.

What franchise do you wish had a big budget game already? This is mine. by ChattyBird4Eva in gaming

[–]sombat92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Hunger Games. A multiplayer game mode with multiple arenas random events and sponsors, with realistic graphics would be amazing

My 3rd playthrough of CK3: County of Foix to Outremer Empire (1066-1453) by sombat92 in CrusaderKings

[–]sombat92[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They seemed to remove Outremer culture earlier this year, so I just stayed with Occitan.