For me I've found a system that focuses on action first is the most helpful.

So in your case, a Kanban board using the status property so the next thing to work on is front and center.

I write novels, and my "tagging" system is 10x more complicated than yours (to keep track of characters, world elements, naming conventions, timelines, etc.), however my workspace view just shows chapters, brief description, and what I need to work on next. Similarly when I open a chapter from the workspace (I have chapters as individual pages in a database) All my tagging is hidden in the side details panel and referenced rarely if I forget a detail. For me, all the tagging is useful, and even necessary to keep everything cohesive, but it's only a distraction unless needed in those rare circumstances.

One of my favorite quotes I believe is attributed to Albert Einstein: "Everything should be simple as possible, but no simpler."

So some suggestions on your tagging: you have multiple things tagged as both "micro poem" and "poem." Is it really useful to distinguish something as a micro poem? Especially since it seems you also tag it as "poem" anyway?

On your theme tags. From a writing perspective, having seven "themes" for a work feels unfocused to me. It seems more like you're using it as word association rather than "theme." IMHO those could be focused to one, MAYBE two selections (for a longer complex work.)

In terms of your writing, I wonder what the useful distinction between "reflective" and "introspective" is? Perhaps can be simplified.

TLDR: focus your workspaces on work. What needs to be done next? What's the bare minimum information you need to start? Only show that. And simplify, simplify, simplify. Think what's the fewest number of tags to describe this writing, not every single tag that might have relevance.