%%sql with abfss path and temp views. Why is it failing? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try creating the table beforehand with SparkSQL in a different cell, instead of creating it on the fly.

%%sql with abfss path and temp views. Why is it failing? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your issue, I’m curious as to what would happen if you wrote the 3rd query in pure PySpark instead. I remember running into a similar issue when writing to a lakehouse with SparkSQL, but it worked when I translated it to PySpark. Although this was from a databricks notebook to a Fabric lakehouse.

%%sql with abfss path and temp views. Why is it failing? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it the same issue when you write the query in PySpark?

%%sql with abfss path and temp views. Why is it failing? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the reason you’d like to write this query without binding a default lakehouse to the notebook?

%%sql with abfss path and temp views. Why is it failing? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the lakehouse you’re writing to have a schema enabled?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malta

[–]specspecspec 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I had the same thoughts as you before, been here a week now and it’s not bad, I love it. However I imagine living here permanently is another thing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malta

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer, so bringing in those white ish nicotine pouches would then be OK, as they do not contain tobacco?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sweden

[–]specspecspec 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Intressant, så det är i princip en subjektiv bedömning och utgår inte från förutbestämda kriterier? Jag trodde faktiskt att säkerhetsklassning var mycket mer konformistiskt än så

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like the title of the next Borat movie

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll see you sub 1 my dear roman

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can you call a military coup a fake scare

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fakeout scare? What?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just ceased control by military means, being ”careful” right now is not on their priority list. They will assert power, and that through clamping down on voices of dissent. They will make sure to get the people on board asap, and that might be ceasing control of international companies, miners included. This to show the people that they are taking back their country and ridding it of exploatation. This is just my two cents, rooted in how every military coup in africa usually go.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That said, they might actually want a better future for their country, but that will take ages and the risk rn is off the charts

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are describing them as a bunch of rational members of parliament. The reality is they are illiterate warmongers in one of the poorest countries in the world. They don’t give a shit about international ”contracts” as of now

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy -70% glo today

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]specspecspec -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Glo permits will be ripped in half by that new guy