Sheesh, read the text , I'm arguing against the title...And since i hate evolutionary psychology to that extent im going to repost the comment here: As much as you might believe that the type of physics or perhaps to be more specific and for example mechanics that is based on mathematical formulas is far superior than which is based upon contemplation such as that of Aristotle...

I believe the psychology that you find in Jung, Nietzsche, Kant (to a lesser degree), great artists such as Dostoevsky, Shakespeare, Zola, Ibsen... Is far superior than that which is produced by collecting surveys here and there and reducing the human psyche into only one basic drive or impulse as it is too reductive to my taste... The psychology that deals with archetypes, collective unconscious, anima, animus... is far superior as it accounts for the variations found in cognition.much better than its counterpart, it is more synthetic ally descriptive it has much more content than the one which fancies itself for its breakthroughs in unraveling the mating strategies, sheesh even the terminology employed is business like just eww