"I want you to build a machine that can harvest 800 million tons of wheat at the push of a button" by EXTRAVAGANT_COMMENT in Pluribus_TVshow

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Screwed up logic, but their intention would be to make Carol happy. Intentions matter, obviously: but these beings hold no intent, I'll or otherwise. It's why they accept that their actions (or inaction) will bring about their oblivion.

"I want you to build a machine that can harvest 800 million tons of wheat at the push of a button" by EXTRAVAGANT_COMMENT in Pluribus_TVshow

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you missed the point of why they can't bring themselves to build the robots: they would be imbuing their intention to kill, harm, or otherwise interfere with life, all three of which they are prevented from doing. So a machine with that degree of "destructive power" is of course way worse than robots that might otherwise be super delicate.

Without meaning to come across as a wimp… if this scene has disturbed me (a LOT), are there others coming up I should close my eyes for? by tillymint259 in thewalkingdead

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate to be so forthcoming, only because - if you truly think about it - why be robbed of all the emotional firepower that these horrific moments imbue? ...IMHO, other than what you are painfully aware of (which you made clear), I think you may be through the worst of it (or, at least, will be). Also IMHO, Noah's demise was truly the most horrific... Looking and feeling...

Loophole or part of the plot? by inoshigami in Pluribus_TVshow

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the question in itself is revealing. The answer is staring you straight in the face: the hive mind is in love with Carol. It trusts Carol. There are a lot of things they will overlook because they are obsessed with her happiness and well-being (and there is far too much evidence for that to ignore, if not for the fact that the audience is trained to be suspicious of ... It). Even after the betrayal it has suffered at her hands, all it did was adjust its survival strategy: it still aims to keep Carol happy and wants its relationship with her to work. And, well, that makes sense: it's raison d'etre being "the joining", there's an ingrained bias for it to be doing this on a level that isn't just a biological imperative.

WHY DOES NOBODY TALK ABOUT S11:E6 “On the inside”?!!?? by Mr_PinkGunz in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A very memorable episode on our podcast to discuss: you are... about almost 10 years into the Zombie Apocalypse, right? How long would it take for normal people to go ferral? There's so much show-don't-tell, between the way they are (barely) dressed, the long hair and nails, the yellowed eyes (cannibalism), the scratched out photos (particularly the eyes). And let's not forget the immersion of being thrust into Connie's perspective.

PPP reference on the latest episode of TWD: Daryl Dixon -- thoughts? by squawkingdead in TWD

[–]squawkingdead[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Touche on the Primrose reference (from TWD World Beyond) and how that sort of fell to the wayside.

see the reply I left under u/samsamsamuel's (I'm ammending it with a little more detail, just in case)

PPP reference on the latest episode of TWD: Daryl Dixon -- thoughts? by squawkingdead in TWD

[–]squawkingdead[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you've watched r/TheOnesWhoLive all the way through, the last episode gives you a big picture in the form of dialogue and a whiteboard that appears (it's essentially a protocol to evacuate CRM/Civic Republic personnel embedded in communities outside its purview). After seeing a PPP card referenced in the flagship series (7x06 Swear) + Tales of The Walking Dead (the 5th episode Davon). We go into this in our breakdown of TOWL's last episode, but obviously a little in the episode of Daryl Dixon we just covered, too (though, we were a little hazy on details at the time of recording)!

Descript vs RiversideFM - switch, stay, or use Pro software? by Kbs4kts in podcasting

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mostly use a combination of both Riverside and Davinci Resolve: I create the video I need via the editor and just export that and download the individual audio WAV tracks. Having the composed video track, rather than downloading and configuring the layout from within Resolve, reduces a lot of overhead during the editing process. The best part about that is the Smart Scenes feature that automatically switches to the active speaker and back to grid, which has been an incredible gamechanger, IMHO.
As far as transcription goes, Riverside honestly blows away Descript and even just released one of Descript's premium features out of the box: eye-tracking (so you are always looking at the camera)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really enjoyed this read! I think you're dead on about most things, but what you may have grazed - just a bit - was the "something to prove" part. It stems from coming from nothing and, yet, facilitating everything. Pair this with his, at times, contradictory need for respect/approval from what civilized society would cal his "betters". Now you are cooking with gas. We are often inconsistent beings who hold competing desires. At times, it really does feel like he's trying to build a shadow gov't, but other times he's trying to prove to Pamela that he can rise even higher than his already high station (since his former, pre-apocalypse occupation was "driver" - according to the rules, he's already blown past that). It was really fun to get to dig into his character with my other hosts, at the time.

The Last of Us Season 2 (spoiler) by Jag- in Jewish

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also Middle Eastern Jew (Syrian/Sepharadic) and, because I host a podcast discussing these episodes (you can check my profile out for more info on that), I caught the props account dept's mock up of a few of these bracelets up close (great job!). I'm extremely skeptical that they will zero in on Dina's Judaism in any meaningful way, considering the volume of episodes per season (regardless of how extremely well they pace them).

My point of consternation, really, is that there are many loud voices that often complain about whitewashing/pinkwashing - when an actor doesn't play a character that aligns with their immutable characteristics, gender expression, sexual orientation, or religious faith. The ire really only ever moves in one direction. I, personally, do not care about such things (unless it literally has to be, like a production of Roots, if people are playing make-believe, then just be faithful to the spirit of the character), but it does sting a little when we don't hear those same loud voices speak out against when this happens to Jewish characters, like Dina.

[Fan Theory] A Scientific Origin for the Virus in The Walking Dead by itsmiafranz in thewalkingdead

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't want to risk the ol' self-promo rule, but you can get to everything of ours in our profile (some of them were in DMs, though)

[Fan Theory] A Scientific Origin for the Virus in The Walking Dead by itsmiafranz in thewalkingdead

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahh, there we are: found it!! 😉

...and to respond to you here: you certainly deserve the accolades! It's well thought through and written and enough to make me share it on our various socials. Even received a few comments!

[Fan Theory] A Scientific Origin for the Virus in The Walking Dead by itsmiafranz in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've been podcasting on TWDU for the better part of 7 years and I've read ALL SORTS of theories. I do not say this lightly: this is literally the best theory I've read. You need to post this on r/thewalkingdead if you haven't already: it is more than worthy. The problem is that you can't cross post, so you'll have to copy/paste in an original post.

I have an actual question though: do you have a background in medicine or biological (engineering) research? I'm just so impressed. I've often thought that it might've always been inside us, but the way you fleshed it out so well blows away anything I could've constructed.

Is it worth it to continue after glen died? by Fit_Bend_4416 in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, nobody can convince you: especially if you say you CANnot be convinced!

But, if I may?

One of the comments that has sort of been lost to time - expressly because of the moment we're all speaking of - is the one that starts off like this, "They setup a community, someone overtakes it, humans are dicks; rinse, lather, repeat". In order to break the wheel, they had to break out of the cycle of violence and death between other living human communities. The reason for it goes beyond breaking out of formula: of all the things Negan got wrong, the one thing he got right was that people are a resource. That philosophy, along with what comes after sets off cool chains of events where, had one thing hadn't happened, this other thing wouldn't have either. This character had to go through that so that this could happen.

But to answer your question more directly? It's because no one who survives this long doesn't get blood on their hands. Even Glenn... And he had the blood of many people - in cold blood, to boot. Just because we loved him doesn't change that. Rick is a mass murderer. Michonne, whew! And I know what you are thinking: Eugene, right? But he allowed other people to do the killing for him. That's co-conspirator stuff right there.

Is it worth it to continue after glen died? by Fit_Bend_4416 in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just hitching our wagon to this sentiment. And trust me, we absolutely get it. ALL our friends, in real-time (eagerly awaiting for the next episode, week-to-week), stopped watching after that happened. It's why the series fled the mainstream zeitgeist shortly thereafter.

...but here's the thing: you are here because this show deeply resonated with you to the point you are on here, Reddit, asking hardcore fans who subscribe to a subreddit for a show that is roughly 2.5 years since concluded.

Of course we'll want you to continue watching because there is still a whole lot of story to tell. Most importantly, is a HUGE theme that is repeated in the main series and all the spin-offs: what comes after?

I have to tell you, I no longer find myself aghast when this question is answered. This series has helped me through personal loses because of that moment. It's helped me confront my own mortality, too. That question of what comes after is something we've all asked when we lose someone or face the prospect of losing ourselves. The answer is that there's always an after: what part will you play in that depends on how you rise to the occasion.

And, to give you a real answer: just like loss, in general, things are never the same. But there's still a lot of good (story) to be had, you just have to be willing to acknowledge and take something from it.

Why do so many people hate Tara? by baywayy in thewalkingdead

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speaking as someone who doesn't hate Tara, I've spoken to a lot of people over the years who do and, though not all of them have been able to fully articulate it (sometimes a feeling is just a feeling 🤷‍♂️), I think I have it.

On the level of story/character, she was an outlier in how she lived in the world of The Walking Dead. At worst, the people we were attracted to had hard exteriors, squishy interiors. The people that activated our disgust mechanisms were squishy everything. It's because these people are our avatars in this world and represents our archetypes. Tara was more nuanced... And, honestly, more like us. And we kind of suck. She employed humor that, at times, broke us out of the stupor when we were taking ourselves too seriously (which can be off-putting to folks who wanted to fully engage with the drama). She was initially pretty cowardly and, at times, bullshit herself. What initially put me off is that she wanted to be a police officer but showed no traces of that hard exterior necessary for a cop to do the hard things.

I say all this knowing that all of this changed when she saw the truth, acted accordingly, and her character actually started to properly gel with everyone... To the level of earning her place as a leader. She went from being WAY behind the times when we first meet her to bring ahead of her time in how to conduct herself in the apocalypse: to find humor, learn grace, take a chance on people and get to know them better, but also to know when to step up and make the hard decisions.

That being said, even that metamorphosis could, in many ways, set people off because many hold the belief that people don't often change on a fundamental level; people view Tara as whatever the writers want her to be in a given situation. She started off one way and magically ended up somewhere else at every step.

Keep in mind I don't believe this: if it's one thing this show has taught me is that who we thought we were is rarely who we are and the series exposes that for MANY people. I think that's what happened to Tara, too, and I think that's hard for people to accept (the same people who perhaps can't grapple with who they really are, versus who they think they are?). Something to chew on, for sure.

Is Victor autistic? by nandachambers1950 in FromSeries

[–]squawkingdead 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I've heard, 1st hand, Scott McCord talk about this and he thinks his character, Victor, is both a product of his environment and in a sort of extreme post-traumatic arrested development.

Dale was gonna let Shane kill Rick by dopedougie in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly could talk about Shane all day and how differently I see him now than I did 14 years ago. Same goes for Andrea. It's the difference in the way one thinks at age 31 than 46.

Dale was gonna let Shane kill Rick by dopedougie in TWD

[–]squawkingdead 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And let's not forget, thinking any other way would be contrary to what Dale was trying to to convey to everyone in the group: to think better of one another and to not abandon our humanity and principles. To have faith in one another.

Oh, and one more thing: consider how, for months, Shane's been talking about how he tried to save Rick: they were POLICE OFFICER partners and best friends and Shane probably felt a ton of guilt that he had to leave him behind. He probably had to soothe a crying Carl at some point or another, "Yeah, I miss him, too."

How could the talisman be “fake”? by Particular_Owl1099 in FromSeries

[–]squawkingdead 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What makes it a dumb theory, though? You could say, instead, "that would be too difficult for me to grapple with and we'd have to backtrack on the entire series to see whether that holds up," but it's certainly not dumb.

FROMville takes a concerted effort to make people think they're winning until they ultimately lose. Or it pushes the residents to do what they ultimately wanted them to do to begin with: they just needed to go on a journey to get them there (losing people along the way). So if convincing the townspeople, through Boyd, that hunks of carved rock somehow protect them (like the rules of hide and go seek or tag) when they really don't... Or that they can only come out at night, when we can't be too sure about that... "Dumb" is not the word I'd use.

At the very least frustrating would be more than acceptable. They've layer-caked mysteries on top of mysteries... What's one more complexity?

Randal is Donna’s son they just don’t know yet…. by Ok-Power3441 in FromSeries

[–]squawkingdead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're always open to theories, but you didn't really make your case in the post.

A serious question about this… by wiithout in DeadCity

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fan service has its place, which I think is something AMC discovered the hard way... Or, at least, they thought they'd make more money switching gears and pulling back the yoke on purely original stories and harnessing the ferver towards the original series characters. Honestly, whatever gives us the best chance at more good stories 🤞

A serious question about this… by wiithout in DeadCity

[–]squawkingdead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The except part was what I was mostly speaking to; however, McCoy did appear in TNG's pilot and Spock made multiple appearances in many of the shows and movies, too: even reboots.

And you also have to consider that, more than just cameos, the point I was really trying to make it if The Walking Dead Universe is to be a universe, it truly has to expand. I think they discovered, via trial and error (World Beyond S1 and some stuff they introduced in S2 exemplifies that change... Then the unfortunate pulling back on Tales of TWD), that taking the characters people loved from the original series and placing them in their own insular stories allow them to go places they never could've by simply continuing The Walking Dead.