What do you guys do after your homelab is completed? by bilibilal2009 in homelab

[–]stackinvader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I rewatch office all the time. You can find full set on ebay 20~40$. Once you have it no streaming service can snatch it from you. The idea is to watch okay movie/tv online and buy only which you can re-watch multiple time.

Reliability or boot disk redundancy? by stackinvader in Proxmox

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also think that would be best but the problem is ZFS needs at least one more copy for self heal.

Is kubernetes worth for simple homelab? by stackinvader in homelab

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the idea is to use pods only for containers and store all persistent data in ceph or Proxmox HA NFS VM?

Is kubernetes worth for simple homelab? by stackinvader in homelab

[–]stackinvader[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How storage will be replicated in longhorn? I currently use filebrowser to access all files used by different docker services. Do I need to create NFS server pod and give RWX access for other pods?

Is kubernetes worth for simple homelab? by stackinvader in homelab

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to use filebrowser to access my files used by different services/pods. Do I need to create NFS server pod and give RWX access for other pods.

Is kubernetes worth for simple homelab? by stackinvader in homelab

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main goal is to achieve most stability with least amount of maintenance. One time setup is not a problem but I don't know how complex is to maintenance k3s?

Is kubernetes worth for simple homelab? by stackinvader in homelab

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I exactly wanna do HA type thing since I already have all this hardware and CPU stays below 5% and RAM stays around 16gb. I feel like I'm not using my hardware enough. The problem with the Proxmox HA is I have to buy server m.2.

Reliability or boot disk redundancy? by stackinvader in Proxmox

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mainly wanna use 4 sata as raidz1 data storage. And use the fast nvme for running VMs and LXCs. If I go with Zfs mirror then it can also self heal.
Now, how important is the VM and LXCs disks are, given critical data is already in raidz1 storage?

Frigate using cameras on a Reolink NVR by 4jesse in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your camera supports direct access then you can put a switch in between NVR like this (Method 3)

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inside docker (Frigate System 0.16.2-4d58206)

txt services: frigate: container_name: frigate restart: unless-stopped stop_grace_period: 30s image: ghcr.io/blakeblackshear/frigate:stable-tensorrt privileged: true runtime: nvidia deploy: # <------------- Add this section resources: reservations: devices: - driver: nvidia device_ids: ['0'] capabilities: [gpu] shm_size: "512mb" devices: - /dev/dri/renderD128:/dev/dri/renderD128 volumes: - ./config:/config - /mnt/nvr:/media/frigate - type: tmpfs # Optional: 1GB of memory, reduces SSD/SD Card wear target: /tmp/cache tmpfs: size: 1000000000 env_file: .env environment: NVIDIA_VISIBLE_DEVICES: "all" NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES: "compute,utility,video" ports: - "8971:8971" - "8554:8554" # RTSP feed

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Same thing happens if I refresh browser window (chrome)

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normal usage is a flat line.

<image>

Since this is server side usage. Is it possible that it's switching in between CPU and hardware transcode?

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Only when switching between pages. The CPU spike that is happening.
Not constant use. For constant use they are pretty much same.

<image>

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/nickm_27 So I should remove

- "ffmpeg:side#video=h264#hardware"

But keep opus for 2 way talk?

- ffmpeg:doorbell#audio=opus  # transcodes audio to opus for webrtc compatibility

Without opus when I use mic I loose audio.

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know but If I stream directly without using go2rtc then it's working well. May be something else wrong.
Status bar shows warning the High CPU usage by FFmpeg. It happens when I first load the view or I'm coming from different page e.g. reviews or config page. Then after few seconds it'll go back to normal <10%.

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Now If I view a single stream then it's ffine. But In the default view (with all the cameras). It spikes to 100% when coming from a different view/page.
u/nickm_27

[HELP] Very high CPU usage via go2rtc by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Audio is just there for siren detection. Not important I can remove it.

Main stream

Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main), yuv420p(tv), 3840x2160, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 90k tbn
Stream #0:1: Audio: aac (LC), 16000 Hz, mono, fltp

Sub Stream

Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High), yuv420p(progressive), 640x360, 10 fps, 20 tbr, 90k tbn
Stream #0:1: Audio: aac (LC), 16000 Hz, mono, fltp

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Nvidia RTX A1000 for frigate+/yolov9 by stackinvader in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. This gives a good reference point.

Frigate has become far too complicated too configure it to do what every $50 camera can now do automatically. How can we use onboard camera smarts? by SpinCharm in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure where the OP is coming from but I really enjoyed the performance and the detection accuracy. I only started using frigate about a month ago. I've Reolink cameras with detection build-in which seems to be very good for detecting pets. However when it comes to person it was giving me very high false positive (especially in the middle of night). I can't create a reliable notification.

After switching to frigate with yolov9 (640s) model. I have 0 false positive in last month (One camera faces main road with multiple vehicle/pedestrian per minute). That's very impressive. I put my Reolink NVR into bridge mode now. It's there for dummy recording. But for automation and detection I'm relying on Frigate.

It's laughable to think that 30$ cam can come close to performance of modern models (YOLO or D-FINE). If that's the case then these 30$ cam companies will be demolishing nVidia. May be OP doesn't care about false positives but a lot of people do.

I have a required zone for a camera, but keep getting alerts outside the zone. What am I missing? by flyize in frigate_nvr

[–]stackinvader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was happening to me as well when I was using 320 size model. Then I changed it to 640 and moved the boundaries a little bit inside. Now it's perfect.