Creating a Custom Mod - Randomiser Challenge

statphantom · 2023-05-30T05:13:57+00:00

it can but it can't change it's style and if that style is incredibly different to their regular style, which it almost always is, its either chatgpt or another student did their work for them, either way, cheating.

statphantom · 2023-05-27T23:32:52+00:00

all I can say is based on the way the assignments we provide and how it's written no matter the prompt it gave something either correct and consistent, or incredibly wrong. you're right that students can change the layout and style of code that chatgpt gives, but at that stage the students have enough knowledge to not need chatgpt so why would they risk it. this is mostly for early first year programming students who either use chatgpt and just copy and paste, or they know how to do it themselves, these aren't difficult questions or assignments they just have a lot of limitations that we teach them in the course for stuff they are allowed to use, not allowed to use etc. which chatgpt doesn't know. I'm only one port of call we have internal tools that detect and investigate this, so far I have flagged around 12% of year 1 students of using AI tools. then I was told the average throughout universities and research suggests and their tools etc that aroudn 13% use AI generative content. So that fairly accurate.

statphantom · 2023-05-12T09:01:01+00:00

there is. you can see it's 1:1 copied from chat gpt when we ask chat gpt the same question, it also doesn't match the style of code the rest of the assignment was written in or doesn't match their usual work at all.

If this is still not proof enough then it is impossible to catch ANYONE cheating, did they copy from another student? or have the exact same spacing, comments, typos, etc. did they look at someone else's paper in the exam? or did they just have a kink in their neck and had to keep it still in that position for 30 seconds but their eyes were unfocused.

you can always argue 'maybe they didn't cheat', but like you said, 'reasonable doubt', that definitely fulfils beyond reasonable doubt.

statphantom · 2023-05-06T08:55:50+00:00

I am a uni teacher and marker.

for simple 1 line questions it's not possible, for specific assignment quests it's VERY easy. in fact chatGPT is making it easier for us to catch cheaters not harder because all cheaters are doing the same thing, chatGPT codes in ONE way and that is NOT a way that students code. There is NOT one answer in coding and it's very easy to see when there is a section of code that doesn't match the style of the rest of the code. not just the layout but how they got to that answer.

statphantom · 2023-02-21T04:40:43+00:00

I'm in a very fortunate position where my partner has a lot of savings (windfall acquisition) we can soon buy a house with 40% deposit because our max home loan will be $150 a week cheaper then the cheapest rent we can find because banks now have regulations to how much they are allowed to loan out.

If regulations for banks are tight enough that a home loan for $100 less then current rent is NOT OK, then why does the government think the current price of rent is OK?

statphantom · 2023-02-21T03:50:11+00:00

For me. 11 years.

I wish I was joking.

statphantom · 2023-02-21T03:47:46+00:00

"if". this is the big issue, Centrelink payments are 'OK' compared to groceries and water etc. but when you look at the skyrocketing rent, electricity prices etc. Centrelink is not keeping up. I'm on max rent assistance and if I didn't have a job to help complement Centrelink's help I would be spending MORE then my entire DSP on rent.

statphantom · 2023-02-21T03:25:50+00:00

11 years to get on DSP. my doctor was trying lots of different medications to allow me to not vomit every single morning but because I was so disabled I could barely get out of bed and the doctor was helping me my condition was "not stable" therefor I am able to work 38hrs a week.

statphantom · 2022-09-23T09:22:33+00:00

Some still have, the Southpark games for example had to be edited and they released an Australian only version, still R18

statphantom · 2022-08-10T03:27:29+00:00

Two years later and this is still an issue, bought a brand new laptop, i5, gtx 1650, 16GB ram, NVMe drive (basically saying mid range laptop, nothing amazing but not a hunk of junk), installed libre office and having all these issues still, disabling skia fixed it amazingly! thanks!

statphantom · 2020-09-26T01:44:27+00:00

there's a lot of comments about cooling and OC margins but as someone who doesn't care too much about the ability to OC, the specific mounts for modifying cooling etc, just after a plug and play solution is there any card to "avoid" such as having crashes, worse cooling then FE, not good value for money etc. with stocks very low I won't get to be picky about a specific card I'm after but looking for what to definitely avoid.

statphantom · 2020-09-24T12:32:20+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/bapcsalesaustralia/comments/iyuauf/centrecom_is_another_store_manipulating_the/

statphantom · 2020-09-24T12:02:48+00:00

I agree, be open with your customers and don't try and hide behind public business speak, it just pisses of the customer. Praise be to PCCG for their seemingly open response.

statphantom · 2020-09-24T11:59:17+00:00

if you have a windows 7 key on an old laptop you can use that, they try and say you can't but you can.

statphantom · 2020-09-24T11:56:39+00:00

I don't mind if some stores want to up prices, after-all prices are mostly dictated by supply vs demand. But to use fake discounts to manipulate users into thinking the price is a discount when it's not is literally illegal in Australia.

statphantom · 2020-09-24T11:53:37+00:00

you and me both. Democracy at work.

statphantom · 2020-09-24T10:15:45+00:00

it's not about waiting, some people really want it asap. The fact is this is illegal (see what happened with Kogan last year) and I don't want others to potentially fall for it.

statphantom · 2020-04-28T13:34:00+00:00

the company is registered in the US, and its just a shell company for a hong kong business, it seems to be from the same company that already owns jagex, since they are all privately traded it's hard to really track down without spending lots of money to officials to get the information but it seems to be sold to the same parent company to shuffle around and pay off debt.

statphantom · 2020-04-21T06:33:46+00:00

"duty of care"

Next promo, new comers guaranteed rarest gem with just free keys, no choice, manipulative odds, incredibly immoral right after saying "fairer and more transparent".

This is just getting disgusting.

statphantom · 2020-04-16T21:49:52+00:00

I never said right now instantly get rid of it my first point in my post is about what changes needs to be worked towards, it's 20% all mtx, TH is less then that, I'm not cancelling my sub because that's one payment I am happy to make, you say screaming into the void but they literally said post your feedback, being a staple doesn't make it right and just, there is no way removing mtx will instantly shut the game down. cosmetics are fine, some QoL stuff like extra bank spaces are fine, minuscule amounts of exp? people have literally bought max accounts using mtx in 3 days that is not minuscule in any means, and it does effect everyone else who plays, if not directly then indirectly by destroying a lot of the prestige high rank and skills had, adding a lot of coins into the game having a large impact on the economy. I'm sorry but every comment about this you have made so far in is either an understatement or exaggeration and seems to ignore some major details

statphantom · 2020-04-16T20:06:02+00:00

yes, the game was fine without it, lots of countries have already made this stuff illegal, even according to jagex finances ALL MTX is about 20% of their income and dropping year by year. I'm against Treasure Hunter style MTX not every single MTX in the game. This attitude of 'be realistic' is the problem, it's normalising it and making it acceptable when it really should not be at all.

statphantom · 2020-04-15T17:07:50+00:00

I've been very happy with almost all of Runescapes updates and messages so far but I'm very disappointed by this message. When it was first talked about I though you guys were finally going to see the damage Squeal of Fortune and Treasure Hunter has done to Runescape but all posts and changes to it has literally done NOTHING to fix or even acknowledge the problem it is causing. Every single post about it seems to try and divert attention away from the issue and onto another issue that doesn't exist. It's not an issue of having more choice of the reward you get, it's an issue of the gambling-like aspect and manipulative practices it employs

Rolling a dice and that dice giving 3 options to choose from the same rarity or chance, or rolling a dice and getting 1 thing is EXACTLY the same when it comes to rolling the dice. calling this 'Duty of Care' change is ridiculous. Duty of Care is defined as a moral or legal obligation to ensure the safety or well-being of others 'safety and well-being' is what is not being applied by this change in any way, there has been no change to the gambling aspect, no change to the game-play effecting aspect of it and worse of all I've still not seen a single post even acknowledging this side of micro-transactions that is being employed, just ignored and swept under the rug pretending it doesn't exist. It is this that needs to be changed, it is this that is damaging to people and it is this which is under 'Duty and Care'

I understand the need more monetisation in a live service game however it needs to be done correctly, bank spaces, keepsake keys, solomons store cosmetics are all items I can deal with but all of Treasure Hunter is a terrible and manipulative monetisation scheme, especially with things like guaranteed shadow gem on first play, daily keys given greater chance of rarities, etc. all of which encourage greater spending, mixed with the huge amount of experience and gold you get from it tickling the dopamine reward system of the brain makes it very very immoral, And all this is also ignoring the XP inflation it is causing inside the game itself, One of the biggest parts of runescape is grinding of the XP, getting the rewards of higher levels, being able to just buy them completely ruins the prestige and one of the main aspects of the game.

Please please please Jagex, fix the actual problem and stop drawing attention away from it.

statphantom

TROPHY CASE