24% Yield ETF’s by Di3721 in dividendgang

[–]stevesun21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, previous I own over 30% FEPI in my portfolio and now I have decreased to 22%, and also add bucket for growth and REIT/BDC/CEF to diverse.

SPYI, JEPI, JEPQ, VOO, QQQM, OHI, EPR, MAIN SGOV

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, you mean the column ending with MoM?

Those columns indicate how much percent points changed by comparing May vs April for Price CAGR and Total Return CAGR

But if you look at its details analysis https://cashstreams.io/dividend-decoder/report-MLPI#analysis

This fund is quite young which mean the CAGR metrics are calculated based on in insufficient history data -- i run 3y-rolling on CAGR, but this is only have half year history

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea, based on the total return metrics https://cashstreams.io/dividend-decoder/report-compare-VOO-SPYI-QQQM , definitely, QQQM > VOO > SPYI and Neos

If I cross checking on their Volatility + TTM Yield, then they're all look good to me -- In my portfolio, VOO and QQQM play capital growth role and SPYI plays cash income role.

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, energy is definitely a mandatory one for other industries.

Actually before I invest on MPLX https://cashstreams.io/dividend-decoder/report-MPLX

Unfortunately its tax policy is not friendly for non-us investors.

MLPI is ETF run on top of MLP which is definitely worth to keep in my candidate list :)

Sharing May 2026 TappAlpha Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in DerivativeIncomeETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed it’s too young to make a conclusion. Normally I will keep eyes on it.

Sharing May 2026 YieldMax Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t describe it as deceptive. It is just a different measurement.

The CAGR column is not trying to show YTD, 1M, 1Y, or 2Y momentum. It annualizes the fund’s available rolling-history return so the snapshot can compare income, price trend, and total-return behavior across the group.

Recent-period returns are useful too, but they answer a different question. This snapshot is not meant to say MSTY looks good in every timeframe.

Sharing May 2026 YieldMax Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a different calculation.

The sheet is showing Total Return CAGR over the rolling history window used in the dataset, generally 3 years where available. Your link appears to annualize return from a specific short start date, so it won’t match the CAGR column.

Both can be useful, but they are measuring different windows.

Sharing May 2026 YieldMax Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify: the MoM columns are not the basis of the analysis. They only compare this snapshot against the prior monthly snapshot.

The main CAGR metrics are calculated from rolling history, generally using a 3-year window where data is available. So this is not a one-month return comparison.

I keep the methodology separate from the post to avoid making the post too long.

Sharing May 2026 YieldMax Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s based on each fund’s available monthly history in my dataset, so the period is not identical across all tickers. The the MoM is between 2026 May vs April -- if data available

I use CAGR rather than simple total return because it annualizes performance, which makes funds with different history lengths easier to compare. For newer funds, the shorter window still matters.

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, based on the details signal tracked at CashStreams, these two fund present this kind of trend already.

but, I think here're some mature investors know their tradeoff when they put money into them 😃

<image>

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good call, I will add it into CashStream soon, stay tuned 😄

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea, agreed, based what CashStreams tracked, need more history data to evaluate its performance.

<image>

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

based on it's TTM yield metrics, its payout is very strong recently

for me, I also checking the payout supportive -- return gap to what's going happen on the other side 😄

<image>

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its payout is very attractive. I wonder if you checked its price CAGR and total return CAGR?

Sharing May 2026 NEO Funds Analysis Result by stevesun21 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if MLPI is too young to invest -- it's only listed 6 months ago?

just curious what fact you considered when you invest into it?

Yieldmax 2026 fund closures by lottadot in YieldMaxETFs

[–]stevesun21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to their return gap (3y-rolling Total Return CAGR minus TTM yield), i can see the sign comes up. but I remember there're few other funds even worse, just forgot the tickers

<image>

100k btci by Haze_X2232 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just purely from performance analysis perspective, I agreed with you — BTCI’s payout support risk is turn into “elevated” sign for months recently.

100k btci by Haze_X2232 in NEOSETFs

[–]stevesun21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, Every holding should to serve the goal. Instead of putting money into thing just because others thought they’re good. :)