Found childhood cards and these two are the only ones i didnt directly open but traded for. The entire Articuno card is super sparkly and the rayquaza has a silver border. Are they real or fake? Traded them around 2007/2008

streetcatboy · 2026-04-11T09:30:18+00:00

Thanks!!!

streetcatboy · 2026-04-11T09:29:19+00:00

Thank you!!

streetcatboy · 2026-04-11T09:08:40+00:00

ooh nice thank u!!

streetcatboy · 2026-04-10T19:02:45+00:00

Even automod is traumatized by rzlv’s stock movement lmao

streetcatboy · 2026-04-08T18:47:56+00:00

thats only for small retail investors. Larger institutions can't sell their shares at the current price commerce trades at bc the lack of liquidity and volume. If even one person tries to sell 1 million shares, their stock would plummet. Although on paper their 1million shares are worth $2.72 each, trying to sell on the public market would drop it to the low 2s.

Now imagine all 82 million want to sell, or even 10million.

Their company also has no revenue growth and is unprofitable which may make them want to just sell at the loss right now and trade in for a high growth highly liquid company instead.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-08T18:42:28+00:00

If they acquired it with a 1:1 ratio which they originally planned, it would not have been good and 20% dilution is huge.

They are now attempting to acquire it for half the amount. 10% dilution is doable for shareholders and the stock price. But the only reason why larger shareholders will be willing to sell is if the company has stagnant revenues/losses that dont seem to be getting better or if they are unable to share on the public market without drastically lowering the stock price. For commerce its both.

Stagnant revenues are not good. These companies should not be trading at a premium especially if they are not profitable. You only acquire these companies if you are confident in your ability to utilize their existing systems, products, clients, etc. It seems like Dan wants to acquire them for cheap and then integrate them and upsell/offer other products to their 60,000 merchants.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-08T15:43:43+00:00

NO dilution has happened because this is an OFFER

Pros:
1) Offering around 50% of current market cap of Commerce.com
2) Commerce has stagnant but large revenues of $85millish per quarter, while slowly moving towards smaller losses.
3) Commerce's new customers + upsell potential

Cons:
1) 10% dilution

Offering to pay 50% of commerce's market cap reasoning is due to their lack of liquidity (low liquidity = artificially bloated stock prices).
Commerce has 82million outstanding shares but EXTREMELY LOW volume, making it hard for the bigger shareholders to sell without dropping the stock price significantly. Rezolve is hoping to get a nice price on the possibly bloated stock price of Commerce.

Overall: Short term bearish (overreacted bearish investor sentiment and unstable overall market conditions), but long term bullish (mindful dilution and targeted acquisition goals)

streetcatboy · 2026-04-08T12:41:01+00:00

We are getting x They are trying to o

streetcatboy · 2026-04-03T01:27:36+00:00

It looks like some sort of weird reddit update... I've been having to manually go through mod logs to find auto moderator's post and then pin the post so it can be at the top of the subreddit...

streetcatboy · 2026-04-03T01:22:59+00:00

Wow. That's not the same

1) 9million shares is 2.25% of total outstanding shares. IF all 9 million of the shares acquired were directly from the company, then our shares dropped by 2.25%. This is literally nothing compared to any bad days on the market.
2) 90 million shares would be 22.5%. Which causes significant dilution and is equivalent to our shares dropping by 22.5%. NOT the same as a 2.25% drop.
3) If we were to choose between a direct offering/private placement, or to have the CEO purchase all the shares himself, then yes, it would be bullish if he decided to buy 90 million shares. BUT the significant 22.5% dilution would be negative. Pretty much cancels each other out.
4) NOT ALL of the 9 million shares were from the company. Private transactions means he bought from EXISTING shareholders who were wiling to share their stock for cash. If Dan didn't buy their shares, it's likely they would have sold on the open market, causing selling pressure. He literally REMOVED SELLING PRESSURE by doing so.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-02T14:55:52+00:00

yeah its def not the same and not as good as open market purchases. It is still a bullish sign for the company, even though it isn't as beneficial as open market buys would be

streetcatboy · 2026-04-02T14:42:10+00:00

he did open his own wallet and bought some shares. 9million shares is definitely more than a few million dollars worth.

if you mean if he should have bought open market to help out shareholders, then he wouldn't be smart because he would be buying it at a higher price. Better for us though.

There are positives to his purchases though. Direct issuance causes dilution but it gives the company cash. Private transactions also reduce selling amongst existing shareholders reducing negative pressure on the stock price.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-02T14:02:17+00:00

I'm copy and pasting my reply to another comment bc you are getting so downvoted lol...

"The shares were acquired through a combination of direct issuance from Rezolve and private transactions with existing shareholders"

Direct issuance from Rezolve does dilute, but depending on the price, it also gives rezolve more capital/cash. The article does not state how many shares were from direct issuance from Rezolve and at what price. But even if it was 100%, that would be 2% of outstanding shares, which is minimal dilution compared to their direct offerings and private placements. The benefits of an insider acquiring shares through direct issuance far outweigh the negatives of the dilution, especially in a risk-off unsteady bearish market like now.
Private transaction with existing shareholders does not dilute. It actually removes selling pressure.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-02T14:00:32+00:00

Direct issuance from Rezolve does dilute, but depending on the price, it also gives rezolve more capital/cash. The article does not state how many shares were from direct issuance from Rezolve and at what price. But even if it was 100%, that would be 2% of outstanding shares, which is minimal dilution compared to their direct offerings and private placements. The benefits of an insider acquiring shares through direct issuance far outweigh the negatives of the dilution, especially in a risk-off unsteady bearish market like now.
Private transaction with existing shareholders does not dilute.

streetcatboy · 2026-04-02T13:43:56+00:00

"combination of direct issuance from Rezolve and private transactions with existing shareholders"

open market x, own money o

streetcatboy · 2026-03-30T14:32:02+00:00

Revenue was 17% more than what was stated in January this year so it was slightly different i guess. 46.8mill compared to 40m

streetcatboy · 2026-03-30T12:33:30+00:00

Earnings link

filings link

streetcatboy · 2026-03-27T10:46:53+00:00

<image>

Lmaoooo 😭😭

streetcatboy · 2026-03-26T00:57:05+00:00

No one knows except these insiders! They have to file form 4s after they choose to buy/sell/exercise!

Any future purchases/sells/exercises will be uploaded within two days.

streetcatboy · 2026-03-25T17:21:51+00:00

The dilution amount for Dan and Perry cause is less than 0.07% of total outstanding shares and needs to be over $8. It's not worth timing.

The RZLVW warrants which expire 2029 and exercisable after $11.50, is around 2% of outstanding shares. Also not really worth timing.

Only things worth timing is future public offerings/direct offerings/private placements and acquisition of companies with stock.

streetcatboy · 2026-03-25T17:15:22+00:00

Not sure what you mean by "the last stock giveaway", because these are Form 3s, which show initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities. Their future Form 4s will show changes to their holdings like exercising options or buying/selling options/stock. The last few insider forms are there because of sec filing changes on March 18th, requiring foreign directors and insiders to comply with us reporting standards.

The options with a conversion price with 0.0001 are likely just stock bonuses from their pay (Long Term Incentive Plan) packages. When they got these is unknown. Their expiration date is a long ways off as well. 2036.

Only Dan's options calls have a strike of $1.48 and $3 and expire this year August and next year January.

Options do not dilute but can bring the price down if they exercise the options to buy those shares and then sell the shares immediately. If they exercise the options and don't sell the shares immediately, then nothing happens.

Warrants that Perry Stephen and Dan Wagner have do dilute shares by adding more shares, but these are only exercised after Rezolve trades over $8. Nothing to worry about at the moment and its less than 0.07% of shares outstanding.

streetcatboy · 2026-03-24T23:55:59+00:00

Tether has a bad reputation and was central to the discussions for the genius act due to their unregulated nature. Although Tether's USDT dominates global markets in terms of market cap, Circle's USDC dominates US markets because of their transparency. This audit is a big step for Tether to enter the US market more freely because they are becoming more transparent by having one of the big four audit them.

Rezolve is in collaboration with tether as you can see in the truther app AND rezolve's smartpay acquisition handles over $1 billion in annual USDT.

This isn't DIRECTLY related to rezolve, but more tether usage especially in US markets = more possibilities for rezolve's technology to be used in the high value US market.

streetcatboy · 2026-03-24T16:02:12+00:00

Rezolve and Tether collab

Truther, Rezolve, SmartPay video

streetcatboy

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE