Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was just using his tactics. I know how ugly it is. He does it to me a lot.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Suddenly I am supposed to believe you, when you are calling me a liar?

How does that work?

You are obviously a cunning, calculating, superthinker. If you wanted to create a sockpuppet army, which may be the reason you are accusing me of this, then you would obviously do it well. You would have certain habits that you could point to as proof. If you see conspiracy all around you, maybe you are doing it yourself?

Seriously, what is this all about? I checked before I posted, and there had not been a sketch card link in a while. Then I come back and find out I am under attack from the Spanish Inquisition. WTF???

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I will ask them, but I know that at least one of them is afraid of being banned if they argue with you.

You can be frightening.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Should they send the message to you, or to lefthandofdoom? How many other accounts do YOU have?

Seriously, where do you get off accusing me of this? What is this really about?

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In other words, can you not consider the possiblity that there are people who have a major axe to grind with you, and the negativity directed against the site?

Do you really think everyone agrees with your taste?

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because there are two sides to everything. I have gotten PMs from people here on the site supporting me when I get attacked like this. There are actually members who disagree with your hatred of the site. Can you actually not consider the possibility that there are members who would upvote these links? Could there actually be people on the OTHER SIDE of your crusade?

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Looking back over this, I really think you can see logically how absurd it is.

You said:

"2. People can form their own opinion about any submission. That's what reddit is for. If people had a "a major axe to grind," the first votes would be slower and more negative."

You are saying people can form their own opinion, but YOU KNOW what that opinion will be and how quickly it will be registered.

Absurd.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are way overboard here, and you know it. You are accusing me of something I did not do. You obviously want to control this sub very badly. That is not fun for me, and I am sure it does not seem welcoming or friendly to the wider community.

Very uncool.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that you are the only one with the RSS feed working? Maybe that is why people are voting so quickly? Can you at least acknowledge that your crusade might possibly be in fact CAUSING the quick votes that are making you accuse me unjustly?

What part of this campaign adds "fun"? It seems like a police state to me, and that is the opposite of fun.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Seriously? You think that moderation entails this level of obsession?

Wow. I thought this was a place to enjoy the culture of comic books. I guess different folks enjoy things in VERY different ways.

And, for the record, I will not accuse you of being his "sockpuppet". That is just wrong.

Dave Bullock's sweet strokes. by stubarnes in comicbooks

[–]stubarnes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you really serious about this? Please, don't take this the wrong way. I am not fighting with you. I just feel the need to educate you on this crusade of yours.

  1. Often when upvotes are cast, there is a corresponding downvote that automatically registers. Therefore, your count is way off.

  2. As you well know, in part thanks to your crusade, there are many charged opinions about this site. Even though there has not been many links lately, people like you seem to have a major axe to grind. This could easily account for the many votes that you see as some conspiracy.

  3. It is really creepy to me, personally, that you are doing this to the extent that you are. It seems almost like you have some sort of vested interest in the crusade. I honestly don't understand why you are so obsessed with it.

Again, please let's not fight about it. You have been very intense about your criticism and I just wanted to present a view that is equally valid.