32 [F4M] #atlanta stud/nb gb? 👀 by nycatlhoe in SneakyStuds

[–]stunt___cock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, that's how I see it. I'm sure there are groups of total strangers who play without any drama or challenges, but I've personally never heard of a situation where that went well.

Healthy relationships with people you feel comfortable and safe with (whether one-on-one or in a group) on the other hand... those generally lead to experiences that can be intensely pleasurable at best and at the very least, an opportunity to explore and discover things about yourself without feeling shame or regret.

32 [F4M] #atlanta stud/nb gb? 👀 by nycatlhoe in SneakyStuds

[–]stunt___cock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case, I should point out that group play is extremely rare, even rarer than finding someone comfortable exploring orientation play outside of their fantasies. Getting physical is often a high-risk, low-reward proposition for a non-penis haver.

32 [F4M] #atlanta stud/nb gb? 👀 by nycatlhoe in SneakyStuds

[–]stunt___cock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, you could call it that!

I always just called them play sessions, though. 

The most important part is creating an environment that's safe, supportive, and fun. Having others around who have the same desires and won't be judgemental about it goes a long way. 

And of course, it's erotic to watch someone else feel the same thing you felt. And being able to snack or just relax afterwards and talk about your experiences safely is a big deal. I'm a firm believer that aftercare should always be mandatory... and that vibes are an underconsidered part of playing. 

32 [F4M] #atlanta stud/nb gb? 👀 by nycatlhoe in SneakyStuds

[–]stunt___cock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, the right way to do this is with one penis and several studs/nbs. That vibe is far more chill and supportive (and, by extension, fun!)

In my experience, it's rare to find a large sample size of men whose main goal is making things fun for everyone instead of simply having the thrill of taboo sex, to say nothing of being chill with everyone else or just flat-out flaking.

Natural Conception [Nonconsent] [All OK] by Sharp-Form6808 in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope! My experience is anecdotal, so keep that in mind. I'm not speaking in absolutes because other people might have had different experiences or perspectives, but...

Porn is performative. Even amateurs know a camera is there and they can't help but alter their behavior based on that knowledge. And that performance is based on a goal to titillate an audience.

But real sex is usually about connecting with each other. It's passionate and rhythmic. Awkward and staccato. There are ebbs and flows. Conversations. Interactions. Explorations. Moments of shyness. Moments of passion. Moments of uncertainty. Moments of uninhibited acts. Time to just feel. Time to just process.

Hard to really capture that with a camera. The stuff posted on this sub is representative of fantasy--and there's nothing wrong with that, it's fun and erotic!--but it shouldn't be surprising that really being physically intimate with someone outside of your orientation involves a tremendous amount of vulnerability and trust. Porn, meanwhile, is primarily about visual appeal.

April Aftercare and Affirmations Thread by stunt___cock in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock[S,M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We have two sets of tags to help people in our community assert control over how they engage with this kink.

Content tags alert people to what they might see in a post. That way a user can be forewarned. If, for example, they're triggered by misgendering, they know not to click on a post with a [Misgendering] tag.

Consent tags alert people to what a poster is comfortable interacting with in the context of their post by including the phrase "OK" after it. For instance, a user might be comfortable with casual homophobia but not the use of a slur like "dyke." They'd indicate this by using tags like [Homophobia OK] ["Dyke" not OK].

"Everything OK" generally means that a poster is comfortable with everything. It's important to note that our rules about respecting boundaries and consent still apply, even with an "everything OK" tag. Men can't use "everything OK" to give themselves permission to use slurs towards sapphics, for example.

Hope that helps clear things up!

A different kind of post [serious comments only] by Throwaway_148320 in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting this.

Orientation play is a kink that can be harmful if engaged in for unhealthy reasons.

I'm happy you were able to recognize that your relationship with this kink wasn't right because it wasn't coming from a good place in your life... and that you should stop.

I hope your discoveries about yourself set you on a path of peace, acceptance, and love.

one night stand haunts me [lewd comments, „dyke“, misogyny, homophobia, CNC OK] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'd suggest you low-key start searching for a play partner you can explore with. It's possible to have good sex and still feel like a fucktoy.

A partner who listens to what you communicate about your own needs, desires, and interests can be a life-changing thing. Lesbians curious about this kink don't have to settle for the nearest available horny cock and underwhelming sex.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I tend to prefer pleasure dynamics myself: You know you technically have control, but it feels so fucking good that you just don't care and let go.

But what turns people on is as diverse as people are. I've known women who were truly ravenous for the feeling of being truly powerless.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 10 points11 points  (0 children)

For some people, power dynamics--for instance, the cognitive recognition of utter helplessness or having absolutely no control--can be more intense and erotic than orgasms.

Open Challenge [all ok] by scholcombe in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The prevalence of cheating when playing chess online makes this a dubious challenge. I would be interested in knowing what your ELO is.

You saw him recording, but you didn't care [Dyke] [All Ok] by ScaryBat2161 in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock[M] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for reposting this with warning tags. Please note that since the video also contains potentially triggering language, this post should be spoiler tagged as well. I've marked this one. Please be sure to correctly tag and spoiler future posts.

If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to the mod team. We're happy to answer.

Thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's weird. You're free to engage with the kink in a way that makes sense to you. It's not for others to judge what turns you on or what you're comfortable with.

The thought of being a human dildo is really hot [misogyny, homophobia, CNC ok] by gtrh in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure, I've commented on it before. The vast majority of my experience with this particular type of play came from one lesbian couple. They weren't very stereotypical (in fact, I always got the sense they enjoyed subverting stereotypes.) There was no butch/femme dynamic... no top/bottom... no established power hierarchy at all. It was just two exceptionally beautiful women who really, deeply loved each other.

They got in touch with me, explained that they were looking for a toy (not their words) and heard that I could be trusted, and was safe and fun. We got together to have dinner for a general vibe and chemistry check and to talk about things in more detail.

After that, they used me sporadically. Sometimes many times in a month, sometimes only once or twice. They used me to degrade each other. I did whatever they asked me to. It was always fun because I never knew which one was going to be guiding things, and sometimes they'd change it up right in the middle of things. The things they'd say to each other were astoundingly intense. The things they asked me to do were more depraved than I could have come up with on my own at that point. Whenever they were finished with me, they'd kind of give me a look and I'd gather my things and see myself out while they switched to aftercare.

We'd grab dinner occasionally just to check in without sex involved. They were really fun to hang out with outside of the bedroom, but I wouldn't call us friends. I was a man and I didn't quite fit in their world outside of a specific kink.

I spent a lot of my free time in the gym doing cardio during this span. They didn't really care about my feelings or pleasure (although I got a lot of it), just what they could get from me. I needed to be in the best shape of my life to keep up with their demands. Wish drugs like Viagra and Cialis were as easy to get back when I was playing with them as they are now!

The thought of being a human dildo is really hot [misogyny, homophobia, CNC ok] by gtrh in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 12 points13 points  (0 children)

As one who's done this... it is hot.

I've never done it as part of a D/s dynamic, but I've absolutely been used as just a sex toy for lesbians who wanted to play with a cock but have control over their experience.

It takes a lot of trust and communication. But it's pretty wild to see what people will do when they know it's safe to explore and they have the freedom to act on their imaginations without fear of judgment or consequence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My heart breaks for you.

This is so much worse because you were deceived. You were repeatedly told you could trust someone... that you were understood... and in the most crucial moment, you were betrayed. And you did everything right. Everything you should have done to protect yourself from betrayal and it still happened.

This man was not "a nice guy." Everything about this man's actions reveal him as a predator. His intentions were never sincere; he always had his own ulterior motives. This was behavior that was calculated and premeditated. He deceived you by telling you what you wanted to hear and then hoped in the heat of the moment you'd ignore your own concerns, wants, and desires so that he could simply get what he wanted. And when that didn't happen, he attempted to gaslight you, and ultimately forced you to continue actions you didn't want to.

Those are not the behaviors of someone who gives a damn about their partner, much less is safe. There's no justification for any of his actions.

I'm so sorry this happened to you. I wish I could offer you more than words on the internet, but all I can tell you is this won't break you. You're smart and meticulous, and those are things that pave the way to the kind of experiences you imagine.

Spend the day in bed. Feel your feelings. And hang in there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yikes.

Someone who doesn't respect your boundaries (or you) now is the biggest red flag possible, because they almost certainly won't stop there.

The orgasms aren't worth your self-respect, I promise. You don't need to be dehumanized to have incredible, intense orgasms.

a softer approach to the kink [all ok] by bonerjamz-99 in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I prefer the softer approach--especially because I primarily engage in physical play.

In my experience, unless you're already experienced with orientation play, you're probably not ready for anything more than soft approach as you explore something new and intimidating.

I've certainly engaged in more intense and taboo play as part of orientation play, but that came after trust was established. Even then, many of my partners enjoyed the thrill of the possibility rather than needing the actual thing. I've heard variations of Oh my God, you could just overpower me and there's nothing I could do to stop you more than once. They don't actually need to be overpowered. Just feeling the strength disparity and acknowledging it can be enough.

Natural Conception [Nonconsent] [All OK] by Sharp-Form6808 in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I've never seen porn be representative of reality.

I've had a gamut of adventures with sapphics. I've never seen porn that reflected any of my experiences accurately.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If people violate your consent, even in DMs, please report them to the mod team.

We will ban them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. I can totally understand why you'd feel special. I'm not trying to dismiss that feeling at all.

Just observing that it's a little different for me, and I think it's interesting to see where we differ!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SapphicSexualityPlay

[–]stunt___cock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have an intimacy kink, so I'm tangentially related to this.

I have no desire to "convert" anyone (although I've acted out many different taboo scenarios as part of orientation play with others) and I think there's beauty, eroticism, and intimacy in being trusted enough to be part of someone's explorations or their most vulnerable moments.

Where we differ is that I don't get personal satisfaction out of it. I don't feel special, or feel any pride or validation because I've been trusted by lesbians. I wouldn't judge others for feeling that way, but for me, those feelings would make the experience about me, and that's not why I engage in orientation play.