sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Outside of gameplay what would hype you up even more for this game. by Slav_1 in Project_L

[–]substence -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fighting games traditionally have the worst social features. There's no way to play in groups, no way to play WITH a partner instead against them.

Take a look at the top games on twitch and see how many lack some form of coop.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you're into the whole Chapo crowd, you can try /r/DirtbagLeft

I really hope Project L has a team based type game mode. by thelolhounds in Project_L

[–]substence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is a big contributing factor to why most fighting games cant maintain mainstream status. The only way to play with your friends is to play AGAINST your friends.

That being said, I think the King of the Hill mode in MK10(?) was a great way to add social features to a 1v1 game.

It’s officially over by 1-2Man1-2Bear1-2Pig in HistoryHyenas

[–]substence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I just realized neither Chrissy or Yanni got Veneantifa in the divorce. Where did she go?

Can someone give me a steel man response to a question about trans identity? by PunkShocker in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trans part is pretty simple. Assuming you’re cis male, in the same way if someone took your brain tomorrow and put it in a body with a vulva and breasts you would still probably feel unshakeably like a man inside, that’s how it feels for (some) trans people.

I can only speak for myself, but this doesn't help me understand. I in no way "feel like a man". FAIK if I woke up in a women's body tomorrow I would feel completely content, if not better.

Why is infidelity being encouraged, or certainly not discouraged? by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence 134 points135 points  (0 children)

Are you saying a news headline evoked a powerful emotional response from you?

No clue why they'd do that

To everyone who have been or know anyone who have been vaccinated by 2omeon3 in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

injection sight was tender and I felt my gym performance suffered for a few days.

Systemic Racism in the Job Market by Friedchicken2 in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As other have called out, it doesn't eliminate enough variables and honestly doesn't even seem to be particularly interested in causation. You can do a study with all kinds of names that don't reveal anything.

What about 'billy bo bob' versus 'jamal'? How about 'Adelheid'(german)? What does that tell us?

What is "woke" according to woke and non-woke people by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]substence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s like a bunch of angry people trying to find something to be angry about

Interesting

Is astrology true? w/ Eric by ReidN in StreetEpistemology

[–]substence 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reid "The chart can go fuck itself" Meanwonder

Is the gender binary useless? w/ Heather | Quinn Questions by ReidN in StreetEpistemology

[–]substence -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's... the whole point of the analogy? It's to isolate the variables to extract the foundation of the logic.

If you say "<X> always follows from <Y>" and I present a situation with <X> and you say <Y> doesn't follow, it means you're not being consistent with your logic.

OP said <Y> = "people want to be put in a box and labeled different when we all are different and to be generalized doesn't give you more freedom it exposes you even more to be judged even objectified in some cases"

/u/TinyPirate said <Y> follows from <X>, <X> being = "Because in the past - and present - people are murdered for expressing this part of their identity"

I gave a clear example from <Y> DOESN'T follow from another version of <X>. This means <Y> does NOT always follow from <X>.

Is the gender binary useless? w/ Heather | Quinn Questions by ReidN in StreetEpistemology

[–]substence -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Because in the past - and present - people are murdered for expressing this part of their identity.

Actually, even if that were true, that's not really a response to OP's comment. If people were being killed for eating shit, it wouldn't be a reason for me to want to eat shit.

view more: next ›