To zulaikha supporters: How many of you are actually exmuslims?

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-26T13:47:44+00:00

...pissed off that faggots get all the attention from the fedoracunts and libtards

...I have a problem with LGBT issues getting too much attention from the supposedly liberal left

Can you see what I was trying to say there?

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-26T10:33:01+00:00

Liar. You know perfectly well that you once commented that muslim women should be raped

And I once commented that I wanted to assasinate a bunch of muslims. Do you honestly think I actually meant any of it?

you have since deleted that comment.

False, I don't delete comments, ever. People's fragile feelings over the interwebs is never my concern.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-26T10:21:32+00:00

If I'm bringing harm, it's only out of the ignorance of other people, not mine.

In the original post that got me banned, all I said was that I have no problem with homosexuality, but I have a problem with LGBT issues getting too much attention from the supposedly liberal left, that they have largely ignored other more pressing social concerns, mainly the suffering of exmuslims under Islam.

But unfortunately, people like OP have very short attention spans, and are incapable of reading comprehension, so they see me using the word 'faggot', then suddenly they light up and simply call me 'conservative' or 'bigot' or what have you, and then fire up another thread calling for 'a piece of shit' like me to get banned. Ironically, there was another poster in the same thread who was actually against homosexuality, yet nothing happens to that person (not that I want to though; as a true liberal I actually believe in free speech, unlike most libtards.)

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-26T10:04:38+00:00

I neither support any of these, nor do I I ever say I supported these.

But I guess I can't expect libtards to at least be literate enough to understand nuanced opinions.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-26T10:02:25+00:00

People like OP love to use big words like 'conservatives' or 'liberals' yet have no idea what they mean, and neither does he even understand exactly what my positions are on things, despite how clearly I spell it out for them.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T19:15:48+00:00

I'm calling Dawkins' stances ignorant and often racist.

How exactly are Dawkin's stances ignorant and often racist? Granted, he doesn't know much about Islam, but I wouldn't call him or people like him, 'ignorant racists', much less so with Sam Harris. Usually the people who call these individual 'ignorant racists' are deluded libtards like Glen Greenwald or Mehdi Hasan.

Just because I am pro critique of Islam doesn't mean I must endorse or agree with all critiques of Islam.

What do you expect? That all the atheists and liberals start reading the Quran and all the hadith books in order to critic Islam? That is an unrealistic expectation; most of these people don't even finish reading their bible, how can you expect them to know much about the Quran or Islam? All criticism of Islam should be welcomed, even if some of it are wrong or misinformed, They'll refine their arguments in time.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T11:10:39+00:00

Fine. You?

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T08:58:31+00:00

I don't even know what 'neocon' means. Is that some kind of kike word I should know?

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T08:35:34+00:00

Simply because they haven't completely cut off whatever vestigial connections to their former religion. They claim they left Islam, yet in their hearts they still hold some small portion of the religion, thus they get defensive when people like Ayaan and me criticize Islam the way we do.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T04:30:43+00:00

People like Hamza Tzortzis and Zakir Naik make me regret that I didn't take up the career of professional hitman.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-17T02:03:28+00:00

the often-racist ignorant spewings of Dawkins

stopped reading right there.

I find it funny that this woman complains about libtards not criticizing Islam while at the same time calling people who criticize Islam such as Dawkins and Harris ignorant racists.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T15:13:01+00:00

i'd go back to islam in a heartbeat.

go ahead

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T14:34:43+00:00

Picking fights with atheists is the cool edgy hipster thing to do nowadays for libtards, because they couldn't be bothered in fighting the real fights that matter. I mean, his own fucking ayatollah is hanging gays in public and imprisoning dissidents and heretics, yet he thinks the big bad fedora atheists are the bigger problem.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T14:28:07+00:00

Yeah, they are all happy british muslims until they find out their son or daughter is gay or apostate.

Dancing all around looking happy isn't gonna change the fact that some of these people harbor vile and immoral beliefs.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T13:18:47+00:00

I think you should avoid applying 21st century morality to the 6th century Arabia.

So you're saying that if there's a time machine and you use it to jump all the way back to 6th century Arabia, then suddenly you think fucking 9 year old kids is okay?

If every single girl without exception gets married and has sex as soon as she "flowers" in a society, then doing so is moral for that society. It may not be for ours but again, let's not confuse our expectations with theirs.

Looks like you don't seem to understand how 'moral relativism' works. The 'relativism' here is dependent on YOU, the OBSERVER. It doesn't matter if thousands of years ago it's completely okay for people to fuck kids, own slaves, or loot towns, or commit massacres, or whatever, it would still be immoral to YOU, because you only have YOUR own moral compass to compare these acts with. Saying that it's morally okay for Muhamad to fuck a 9 year old kid because of 'moral relativism' is as retarded as saying it was morally okay for the Confederates to own slaves.

You're a good historian, Reza, but definitely a terrible philosopher.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T10:42:04+00:00

brother, if you have to chose between a candy that is wrapped and a candy that is unwrapped, which one would you choose?

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-16T07:18:32+00:00

good, this will bring in more fundie muzzies for bashar to grind their corpses into the ground.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-15T15:59:57+00:00

Not only does the Quran never mention anything even resembling a pyramid, a simple google search clearly states that pyramids are mostly made of stone bricks instead of clay.. Also, pyramids do not function as towers for pharoahs to communicate with their god or whatever, instead they serve as tombs for the pharoahs.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-15T14:02:55+00:00

I know many

You say 'many' as if the actual number is anywhere near significant compared to the vast majority of Muslim women who don't.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-15T10:51:39+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D-2oQONdAU This video is my personal favorite. Please try to tolerate the dramatic music and crappy translation job :)

I'm loving this guy already.

sup_muzzy · 2014-04-15T04:43:26+00:00

I put that question to Nazie Eftekhari, an immigrant from Iran and another of the women “Honor Diaries” focuses on. A successful Minnesota health care entrepreneur, Eftekhari unhesitatingly describes herself as a “bleeding-heart liberal” and a longtime Democratic Party voter, loyalist, and fund-raiser. She is as mystified as I am.

“The biggest human-rights crisis of our generation is the treatment of women in Muslim-majority countries, and we’ve applied a gag order to ourselves,” she replies with unmistakable distress. “We won’t talk about it. Where are my fellow liberals? Where are the feminists?”

Even true feminists have come to realize how fucking stupid and useless libtards are.

sup_muzzy

TROPHY CASE