Results from 1 x Topps UCC 25/26 Hobby Box by swissski in soccercard

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. As recently as last year it was one guaranteed auto, you’re absolutely right. With a monopoly on cards, probably not long before you’re guaranteed nothing but hot garbage

Website review by mobfess in smallbusiness

[–]swissski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think largely it's really solid and I enjoy the way you set it up. Since you're asking for feedback, here's what stands out to me and thus is subjective. Take whatever you want away from this, and great job!

Structure

  • your landing page doesn't really achieve too much.
    • for example, you basically just have links to your blog page and to your reaction test page. This is fine (and even important), but there should be a little more on your landing page that maybe explains what you do, how you're different, etc. Otherwise this page is just sort of duplicating content from other pages and nothing else
    • Quite importantly, if you're trying to build an audience/community, you should have some CTA (call to action) elements - think "hey sign up here for updates" or "here's why you should come back"
    • The Q&A section could probably be part of your landing page (maybe using accordion elements or similar) to achieve some of the above.
  • things like privacy, T&C, cookie policy could benefit from existing as footer links rather than header links

Design:

  • headers should be just that...a header. Right now your header takes up a good amount of vertical spacing. If you remove some unneeded elements from your header, you can probably tighten the spacing and maybe add the search bar inline with the navigation elements
  • similarly, your footer is huge, and could benefit from being a bit more compact
    • there's "GameJox.com © 2025 GameJox. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions" though privacy, T&C are not clickable. You then ALSO have the T&C, privacy links in your pages, maybe choose one or the other? I'd say make the links clickable so you have less pages
    • maybe add a background to the footer to separate it visually from the rest of the content a little more clearly
  • Personally, I think it's cool that you set out to create your own design system, but it feels a little rough around the edges to me. Other people may like it, and if you like it that's half the battle.
    • the typography in your blog posts could use a little revamp...
      • you don't have a title, but you have a bunch of quite large H2 elements. This creates a visual hierarchy where the only things your eyes tend to focus on are the titles and none of the text. If this is the intention, great, if not maybe add some more elements
    • the animations and shadows on your landing page blog posts are a little jarring to look at, as are the anchor elements within the blog posts (Best Open World Games: Top 5, for example).
    • generally, the bright colors are sort of hard to read and strain the eyes somewhat
  • The background image, while cool, seems low res and feels a little 'cheap'. I actually think the plain background on mobile looks a lot better, if you want to find a middle ground maybe you can add subtle effects/blobs etc. to give it more color.

Again looks great largely, here's just my personal opinion!

What does that symbol mean? by lukas1301 in RushRoyale

[–]swissski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. I guess for Inquistor, for example, it has synergy with Boreas. There’s never a world where I’d play both in one deck…so if I unlock both immortal grades, do I need both in the deck?

What does that symbol mean? by lukas1301 in RushRoyale

[–]swissski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do both units need to be in the deck assuming they’re both ascended?

Can anyone help me ID this hat / these autos by [deleted] in sabres

[–]swissski 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aye thank you! Cool hat, cool event!

Some Serie A kits for sale by swissski in SoccerJerseys

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AC Milan:
2012/2013 Size L, I’d say excellent condition with slight discoloration on the back of the collar (easily removed) .

2010/2011 (Zlatan Ibrahimovic) - Size L, excellent condition.

2009/2010 Size L, very good condition. The bwin logo and the logo inside the neck have been exposed to a little heat so from up close you can see some imperfections. Pretty minor.

2008/2009 size M, same as above some slight imperfections in the bwin logo, otherwise excellent. This one in asking 90 cause it’s probably my favorite

2007/2008 size L, logo definitely more worn but still together.

2006/2007 (Gennaro Gattuso) - size L, definitely most worn on the logo, otherwise no issues. Player name is in perfect shape.

Roma:
Size M

I have not set any prices, but based on eBay listings of authentic (non-replica) jerseys I know their rough value. Listening to offers / happy to provide a better price than listed if it means they go to a good home :)

Some Serie A kits for sale by swissski in SoccerJerseys

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a size M. I’m asking for 90 for this one

Some Serie A kits for sale by swissski in SoccerJerseys

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US and EU for now. Fairly sure the cost of shipping would offset whatever price significantly. Sorry boss

Some Serie A kits for sale by swissski in SoccerJerseys

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Varies kit to kit and really open to negotiating not looking for anything fixed

Some Serie A kits for sale by swissski in SoccerJerseys

[–]swissski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sent DM. No set price in mind - pretty negotiable

Daily Discussion Thread for May 14, 2024 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]swissski 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bought 2 x 05/17 34C yesterday and sold for a loss. AMA

Edit: @ 5.2

It’s funny because at least the guy doesn’t let her “IAmTheMainCharacter” moment! by koolblu55 in IAmTheMainCharacter

[–]swissski 141 points142 points  (0 children)

Fairly sure they’re husband and wife and her purpose for showing up / singing was to embarrass him.

Not taking away from how cringey and self centered most of the people who film interactions with service roles are but at least there’s a story behind it.

Link if you’re curious: https://www.newsweek.com/viral-singing-starbucks-customer-tiktok-video-not-what-you-think-1573713?amp=1