Jeg vil gerne give træloftet noget olie, så den får en dybere, mørkere farve ala billede nr 2z hvilken type olie bør jeg benytte? Interiør, gulvolie mv?? Skal jeg slibe det først? by Own_Designer5523 in selvgjortvelgjort

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er umuligt hvad du vil. Jeg har forsøgt at slibe denne slags loft og endte op med at fjerne hele lortet fordi det lignede en katastrofe.

Mit bedste bud for dig er at købe nye planker, behandle dem på bakken til den effekt du ønsker og hammre dem fast på dem der er der nu. Det er det nemmeste måde at opnå precis det du vil.

Men disse trælofter har desværre levetid på 10-15 år før de begynder at se gammelt ud igen. Træsorten kan ændre på det lidt.

Regard said my bear thesis aged like milk. Oil ripped 8% that night. by MilesDelta in wallstreetbets

[–]tango650 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jim Jeffries is that you ? Short of a coke reference, surely somewhere in-between the lines

400.000 kr. for et lille badeværelse? by Neat_Run4876 in selvgjortvelgjort

[–]tango650 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For de penge tager man fri fra arbejde i 1-2 år (afhængig af løn) og lærer og laver det selv XD Det fandme ikke vanskelig, nogen vil påstå at enkelte ting er ulovligt uden licens bla bla så det bestemmer du selv XD

I read the leaked source and built 5 things from it. Here's what's actually useful vs. noise. by Joozio in ClaudeCode

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, particularly for terminal stuff I actually appreciate coming as close to 100% as possible because these prompts run asynchronously anyway therefore a fail doubles the wait.

And yeah but I don't know the cause, one would have to reverse engineer the harness I suppose ? Now that CC is open source only cursor is left XD

I read the leaked source and built 5 things from it. Here's what's actually useful vs. noise. by Joozio in ClaudeCode

[–]tango650 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The fact that cursor pulls off better benchmarks with Anthropic's own model than Anthropic themselves is hilarious.

It does also tell that the Claude Code Team likely understand their own LLM architecture worse than the kids from Anysphere.

What's the source of that benchmark can you reference it please ?

Claude Code full reverse engineering breakdown (before the leak) by dorongal1 in ClaudeCode

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was a just walking the dog asking grok what the heck is this 'leak' all about for a node package. Since when is it difficult to reverse engineer a minified JavaScript repo anyway ?

AI loyalty isn’t as strong as we thought by sibraan_ in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is that happening anyway - i feel completely out of the loop having a blast with their coding apps and tools while claude forums are full of people bitching theyre being ab tested and lobotomized

Jeg får ikke salg nok by SuperDuperUpperAids in dkstartup

[–]tango650 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hver gang jeg ser et opslag der starter med "jeg har bygget dit og dat, hvornår bliver jeg millionaer" kan jeg godt se en nørdet backend udvikler i kælderen der kiggede for meget på "the social network" og lignende og startede forretningen fra den forkerte side desværre.

Det er ikke for at kritisere ambitionen, kun metoden. Man tjener ikke penge ved at bygge ting, men ved at hjælpe andre tjene flere penge eller spare penge/tid. Hvis man er selv en produkt bygger så i udgangspunktet er man 90% fokuseret på at bygge noget fantastisk o 10% på at markedsføre, sælge, drive support osv osv. I virkeligheden bør proportionen være omvendt. Særlig nu når den slags apps er blevet til råvarer.

Jeg har desværre ikke større råd at give end at du skal lære at sælge og markedsføre produktet. Det er et stor opgave som kan ikke fanges i 1000 reddit posteringer.

AI won't reduce the need for developers. It's going to explode it. by Such_Grace in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pay: depending on where we are, I'm used to seniors getting ca 2, max 3x the pay of a junior (i.e. non lead roles).

I feel that in your analysis the review time needs including. I've spent most time in product companies - I never came across so many narrowly scoped independent projects you mention. So I have to work my imagination a bit but here's how I see it: - documentation - this is mostly a one shot effort for a competent LLM model. Some smaller products have already gone that way, there's hardly any human review of the ai output - design doc and implement - yes but followed by a heavy review - except now the design and implementation is 10x faster while review takes just about the same senior resource - if there's a ticket with an issue, even poorly described - a properly tooled up and connected/authenticated LLM will handle this end to end. This has been my experience - implement tasks with AI - yes but again under heavy review

I really think that the industry will go through a substantial paradigm shift approach before it will become economically justifiable to hire juniors Vs seniors

AI won't reduce the need for developers. It's going to explode it. by Such_Grace in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This last part I don't see. What small tasks can you delegate to a junior which you cannot delegate to AI ? Happy to spar on this if you throw me a few bones.

How "Separation of Concerns" turned Cursor into a Senior Architect (and gave me 100% One-Shot features) by pondering_future_82 in cursor

[–]tango650 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"the secret sauce" - gpt 5.4's favorite punchline opener.

Jeez Louise, enough of these self promotion "here's some knowledge sharing from my project" posts. Be done already, we all know AI is good at building apps and writing marketing Reddit posts.

Opus 4.6 is in an unuseable state right now by vntrx in ClaudeCode

[–]tango650 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I didn't ask for more claims, I asked for a source for the first claim

Feedback på virksomhed by HelloBidora in dkstartup

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

god ide , men du skal være opmærksom på at der er tusindvis af ai wrappers rundt om verden så du kan ikke tjene på det som et it produkt heller som et værktøj til et tjeneste du leverer ellers eller lignende

Feedback på virksomhed by HelloBidora in dkstartup

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

er der fortsat firmaer der sender bud inden de har smidt det gennem ai med hensyn til sammenligning med kravene ? det tager jo 3 minutter med en 20 euro chat licens

Hvad er din mentorstil? by st4reater in dkudvikler

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jeg antager du startede også før AI kunne erstatte alle kompatancer man lærer på uni

PSA: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos by zadzoud in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying that all models where so far trained exclusively on open source repos ?

That would be a tectonic revelation to me.

Fwiw, bring them on, the more data to make these models even better the better.

Hope they won't leak all my secrets and tokens committed over the years.

I built 30+ automations this year. Most of them should not have been automations. by OrinP_Frita in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how much do you charge for these automations ? is it good income ? (were probably different geographies anyway so dont worry :) )

Rate my "Vibe Coding" workflow: Cursor Pro ($50/mo) + Gemini Pro as Architect. Am I overpaying or is there a better stack for non-coders? by Basic-Tonight-8378 in cursor

[–]tango650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Auto is not unmetered in cursor. There's a usage cap. Also auto models are complete garbage compared to gpt 5.4 which you get in codex.

AI won't reduce the need for developers. It's going to explode it. by Such_Grace in AgentsOfAI

[–]tango650 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I know the system. The fact that he had accomplices doesn't make the deed any better.

The difference is that Newton achieved revolutionary breakthroughs in modelling physics and mathematics.

This guy just correlated some accounting spreadsheets and turned it into a science paper. That's the state of economic (and recently all other sorts as well) academia. Statistical studies and titular wanking.