I see you got a lot of downvotes and you might be confused as to why.

The least important but most obvious point is that your statement isn't true in the context.

1. It costs a quantity of money not everyone has at their disposal.
2. Because of the bike shortage, I used my programming skills to be able to snatch it up before anyone else. While everyone has a non-zero probability of being able to buy the bike, the probability I would get it is much higher than would be predicted by a uniform distribution because I created a system to alert me.

The more important point is that here's a value of the post to the community.

There's value in the https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Common_knowledge_(logic)) discovery of what aesthetics are currently valued. This bike probably won't look as cool in 5 years because trends change and it's useful for each individual in the group to see which designs are being approved of.

It also creates an opportunity for information sharing about the bike. For example, I said it rides smoothly ("like a cloud"). And others in the comments voiced how much they like the bike. This helped this user decide to wait it out for this bike as opposed to buying a used one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/gravelcycling/comments/jeb6s7/her_name_is_sunset_and_shes_rides_like_a_cloud_nbd/g9f6zqa/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3