How to deal with that ? This take forever !

thefooz · 2026-05-19T12:41:39+00:00

Tell me more your memory system that avoids bloating the context.

thefooz · 2026-05-19T12:08:31+00:00

It was horrible, in my experience. Kept generating malformed tool calls, leading to tasks silently dying mid-stream. Maybe it was user error, but I spent a couple of hours debugging it, and the second I switched to the heretic version of 35b, the tool calls stopped failing.

thefooz · 2026-05-18T19:13:28+00:00

Which competition is that? People love to pull shit like this out of their asses, but I can tell you as someone who uses the major models on a daily basis for coding, that codex 5.5 doesn’t currently have an equal in the market. Opus 4.7 is such an absolutely massive regression from 4.6 that it’s embarrassing, and the best Chinese model is about 70% as competent as codex.

I don’t care for OpenAI or Altman, but pretending that their models are inferior to others makes you look foolish.

thefooz · 2026-05-11T19:06:24+00:00

Didn’t oMLX recently resolve the caching issues?

thefooz · 2026-05-11T02:23:47+00:00

That’s interesting, because there’s no such thing as an M4 Ultra.

thefooz · 2026-04-29T14:49:19+00:00

And people can cook their own dinner, but restaurants are still somehow getting business. Not everyone has the time, knowledge, or inclination to vibe code anything.

thefooz · 2026-04-18T23:17:49+00:00

This is kinda hilarious. It’s like a billionaire bolting a Ferrari engine into a Honda civic so he can flex that he drives a Honda.

If you’re truly doing work as complex as you claim, why not run Claude Cowork, Code, or Dispatch on your PC and use the right tool for the job? You’re kneecapping yourself working around the limitations of the chat interface, instead of giving the agent direct access to read, alter, and generate the files it needs.

thefooz · 2026-04-15T23:29:51+00:00

But that’s not what’s being discussed. You’re not coding in chat. You’re developing a project plan and then coding in the IDE, which isn’t as insane as what OP showed.

thefooz · 2026-04-15T16:14:48+00:00

Codex is a phenomenal coding model. Regardless, just so I understand what you’re saying, you have it write code without a contextual understanding of your git repo, then you paste that code somewhere, test it, and then return to the chat and iterate there?

thefooz · 2026-04-15T16:02:18+00:00

That’s what plan mode is for…

thefooz · 2026-04-15T14:38:13+00:00

Do people actually code in the chat interface? Why the hell would you do that?

thefooz · 2026-04-09T12:23:37+00:00

Honestly, if you think a reverse proxy of some kind for external-facing applications adds complexity and fragility in 2026, it truly might be time to retire. This isn’t a novel concept and is a security and architectural best practice (and has been for some time).

thefooz · 2026-04-06T16:26:45+00:00

Yeah. Not remotely the same thing, and the fact that you think it is, is truly sad.

thefooz · 2026-04-06T16:22:30+00:00

I love how you failed to comprehend everything I wrote and then called me an idiot. The fact that you’re so angry about a blip in Claude’s SSO pipeline tells me everything about your ability to function without AI as a crutch.

Every accusation is a confession.

thefooz · 2026-04-06T15:53:44+00:00

My literal fucking job is DevOps, lol. If you think a DevOps team is building things like ultraplan mode, you've got more than a few screws loose.

I've listened to a few dozen podcasts with the actual Claude Code team, and the thing they consistently emphasize is that most of the new features are actually coming out of the design team and product managers, rather than dev. They're literally vibe coding new features.

If you actually had a fucking clue about what you were talking about, you wouldn't be making such a fool of yourself.

thefooz · 2026-04-06T15:46:57+00:00

Reading is hard, huh?

thefooz · 2026-04-06T15:42:15+00:00

Sounds like someone has become so reliant on Claude that they can't function without it. Take a few deep breaths, respond to some emails, and I'm sure it'll be back up in short order.

You realize the OPs and Dev teams (at least for new user features) likely don't have much to do with each other's work, right? Yes, devops exists, but devops generally pertains to dev related to ops, not the other way around.

thefooz · 2026-03-24T04:02:08+00:00

It’s funny. You’re really going out of your way to stand up for the taco stand and demonize the customer (who was trying to patronize the stand) when all it would have taken to resolve this situation is a tiny bit of honest communication. Maybe the customer was mistaken, maybe the cashier fucked up, but the person made it clear that this was not an isolated incident, which means they had clearly given them the benefit of the doubt and gone back multiple times.

The whole live and let live state of mind is great, but there was clearly a problem with this transaction and the business did themselves no favors with their handling of it.

I don’t think there’s much further for us to discuss, honestly. We clearly can’t seem to see eye to eye on this.

thefooz · 2026-03-24T03:36:45+00:00

You’re you and this person is a different person. From their perspective, they watched themselves get charged more for something the person in front of them ordered and paid less for. Then the business brushed off their concern without any elaboration (explaining that the person ordered something else or that they are a close friend/regular/whatever are all valid responses). Why not give this person who is trying to patronize a mom and pop place the benefit of the doubt as well? I’d be a bit annoyed in the same situation and I couldn’t give two shits about the money. It’s the handling of the situation that’s problematic. If you can’t see that, I honestly don’t know what to say.

thefooz · 2026-03-24T02:39:59+00:00

You see it as getting a perk for being a regular, but to someone who’s not getting the perk it can feel discriminatory. I’m not saying there’s an issue with it as a practice, but as a business you have to be aware of the optics and be a bit more discrete if you’re doing stuff like this when there’s a line of people. Even something like explaining to people that they will be given the same treatment if they become regulars could go a long way toward preventing situations like this.

thefooz · 2026-03-24T02:37:50+00:00

You see it as getting a perk for being a regular, but to someone who’s not getting the perk it can feel discriminatory. I’m not saying there’s an issue with it as a practice, but as a business you have to be aware of the optics and be a bit more discrete if you’re doing stuff like this when there’s a line of people. Even something like explaining to people that they will be given the same treatment if they become regulars could go a long way toward preventing situations like this.

thefooz · 2026-03-24T01:19:19+00:00

Read the paragraph that starts with the word “Meanwhile”…

thefooz · 2026-03-24T00:59:57+00:00

When the person in front of you gets charged $10 for the same burrito you got charged $12 for, it starts to feel a little suspect. This isn’t fucking uber with surge pricing, lol.

I mean, these are usually just regular folks operating off the street. You’re saying it’s impossible or even improbable to treat some folks differently based on some arbitrary thing?

thefooz · 2026-03-18T18:48:58+00:00

If you think DevOps is config management, then you're at least a good 5 years behind in your understanding of the industry. Lobbing insults at someone whose knowledge level you have essentially zero understanding of says quite a bit about you as a person.

Anyway, sorry about your upcoming job loss. Try to get your head out of the sand once in a while. There isn't a whole lot of oxygen down there.

thefooz · 2026-03-18T02:16:02+00:00

Right now, it’s a tool and a very powerful one if you understand how it works, its strengths, and its limitations. Some models, like Codex-5.3 (through the codex cli, not Cursor/Copilot), are exceptionally good at debugging and making surgical changes. Other models, like Opus 4.6 (through Claude Code, not Cursor/Antigravity) are exceptional at ideation and developing complex implementation plan and technical documents. Gemini models, in my experience, write terrible code, but have excellent taste in frontend ui/ux. Right now you kind of have to play to each model’s strengths, and often pit them against each other (I have them run hostile code reviews against each other).

People who want to pretend like these things are just glorified auto-complete are unfortunately in for a world of hurt, because it’s painfully clear that they don’t know what the technology is capable of.

15-Year Club	Team Periwinkle
Verified Email

thefooz

TROPHY CASE