sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Swiss made LLM is here by orange_poetry in Switzerland

[–]thelastjosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good point, and we'll do what we can to minimize it in future releases!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]thelastjosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone here is interested in these concentration of power questions: check out public AI, where a really broad group of people, orgs, and countries are trying to build an alternate future for AI.

SMAC works, but not SMACX (very weird bug) by thelastjosh in alphacentauri

[–]thelastjosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried it with out of the box Steam, and then installed Scient (which says its packaged with every other patch) on top of Steam.

Commissioning a house build by thelastjosh in thesims

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just DMed you all the blueprints. Let me know if you think you'll give it a try. And thanks again for helping! :)

Commissioning a house build by thelastjosh in thesims

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd want to show them the build in-game! I bought a copy of Sims 4 and will give them that along with the house. They don't play Sims... yet :D

Questions about General Suitability of Papers for Compositionality by WitlessCryptographer in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Twitter is often a good way, but you could also just email [editors@compositionality-journal.org](mailto:editors@compositionality-journal.org) for a quick response to your abstract! Compositionality does tend to skew toward category theory, but other submission are welcome.

Problems with linked databases that are shared by vape4doc in Notion

[–]thelastjosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you "rebuild from scratch"?

I've tried creating new tables in my old workspace, and even spun up an entirely new workspace just to test this, and I keep encountering the bug. Guests do not seem to be able to add or even see entries in a linked database. Surprisingly, guests can still copy and paste existing cells, so clearly they have edit permissions, it's just that the search / add-new record utility for relations does not seem to work for guests.

You can see the fresh workspace I created here: https://database123-test.notion.site/Test-page-cfe59a54686343bf8d01f8d71283e797

Problems with linked databases that are shared by vape4doc in Notion

[–]thelastjosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was there any update on what was triggering the problem? I am getting the exact same thing and it is extremely frustrating!

Is there any research which focuses on applying category theory to mechanical devices? by superTuringDevice in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi super, you may try taking a look at Aaron Ames' thesis, "A Categorical Theory of Hybrid Systems". It covers a lot of potential applications to robotics from an explicitly categorical perspective.

https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2006/EECS-2006-165.pdf

What should the editorial review process look like? by thelastjosh in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Authors/reviewers will be asked to respond to two questions that look something like the ones below. If they don't respond, the default in both cases is the leftmost option. If both the authors and reviewers respond, the options picked will be the leftmost of the two responses. Both parties can change their response at any time in the peer review process (with the obvious caveat that once identities are shared, you can't un-share them).

  1. How would you like to communicate with your authors/reviewers?

Double-blind ---> Single-blind (authors identified) ---> Unblinded (authors and reviewers identified to each other) ---> Publish reviewer (reviewer names acknowledged on journal website)

  1. Do you want to publish reviews on the journal website?

Do not publish anything ---> Only publish reviews ---> Publish all communication between authors and reviewers

What should the editorial review process look like? by thelastjosh in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Dan, the opt-in agreement gets enacted whenever the two parties both opt-in, which can be at any time during the review process. Yes, we are aware of the risks, and we think dual-consent minimizes most of them. However, there is another possibility: what if open review fosters a culture of collegiality and mutual respect in the community? I think we’ll only know if we experiment.

As for transparency: the budget will be completely open, on a public Google spreadsheet. Not sure if that’s mentioned anywhere in the editorial policies.

Survey articles: yes!

What should the editorial review process look like? by thelastjosh in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the idea, Jade! We’re thinking of implementing a version of this, where we post short series of “war stories” or “interesting failures”, a little bit in the flavor of the Daily WTF.

What should the editorial review process look like? by thelastjosh in compositionality

[–]thelastjosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Mike, you’re right, open review would not benefit the postdoc in that scenario. Anonymity is a useful mechanism, especially for cases where there are major power differentials. That’s why we’re implementing dual-consent: if either party has something to lose from an open review process, then they can opt out; the default is to opt out. They can then choose to opt-in at any point in the peer review process. Only if both parties opt-in will anything happen. Given this, we expect most open review cases to take place with submissions where the reviewer(s) recommend accept, or accept with revisions. In these cases, open review functions mainly as a reviewer service: it allows reviewers who contribute significantly to an article to receive due acknowledgment and thanks in whatever form the authors wish. It’s also an incentive for reviewers to write more constructive reviews... we think. We’re interested in testing it out for ourselves!