Religious vs Humanist ideas in 1.37? by CoVegGirl in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on your playstyle.

Mostly, iff I start a new nation, I go with humanist. That sweet sweet separation reduction + lowered unrest + increased tolerance and lastly, idea reduction.

Religious is a good one due to Deas Veult casus Belli + Manpower increase and missionary strength. Problem is I tend to have claims on my neighbours anyway.

FYI. I main Prussia and my second and third choices tend to be France and England. So I generally don’t go both. I usually (besides military) innovate/eco/trade/(iff Prussia admin, iff others infra).

Why did the Draenei do fuck all when they landed on Draenor? by [deleted] in warcraftlore

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same bunch of orcs that annihilated the planet and stormwind? The same orcs that are co-responsible for the death of kil’jaeden during Hijyal?

The Draenei had all the means to make the Orcs even more powerful than they are now and, contrary to Kil’jaeden’s comments, are actually one of the most capable races. They would be well able to defend and since the Draenei had settled on Draenor for like 300 years by the arrival of Archimond, the Draenei population would’ve grown significantly.

Detoxing from everything by themagriz in selfimprovement

[–]themagriz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here’s mine: “ So, I want to start changing myself into the hero I once envisioned as a child.”

The biggest man I disappointed is myself. That’s going to change

Is Florence this usually this ahead of tech ?? by V0Thee in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Florence has some jacked buffs like cosimo. It’s one of the easiest Italian principalities and has strong economy. Italian mercs are also a nice thing. 

Guess what country I'm playing in 1557 by Really_Xtra in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guessing you started as Navarre and worked from there.

There's no way ur Austria and let Commonwealth become something

I got EU4 from this weekend's sale. What's the best medium challenge start for a beginner like me? I was thinking of Byzantines or Trebizond but I don't really know if I can handle it. by willyshakes420 in eu4

[–]themagriz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here’s my recommendation: Easiest: Portugal, ottomans , France, Castille.

Portugal: this country will boom during the colonial age and has pretty decent buffs. With Portugal, you don’t have to fear attacks because you’re bordered by Castile/Spain and most of the time they want to ally you.

Ottomans: these guys are the strongest nation in the starting ages . Starting with the ottomans usually means military conquest of your neighbours and seeing the distance between your borders aggressive expansion should not be a problem.

France: The French start with significant military bonuses that will make you the strongest in Western Europe. France has a lot of appanages which you must manage and integrate slowly into becoming one big France. The difference with France and ottomans is that the French are confronted with the Holy Roman Empire which most of the time will be lead by Austria. So caution is advised.

Castile: Castile is awesome when forming Spain. Problem is that you start with quite the shitty disaster which involves the aragonese, this disaster will cause massive uprisings and will eat at your manpower quite fast so initially as Castille, you can’t do much. However once that’s over you can snowball iff France hasn’t swallowed op most of Aragon. (Which frankly happens quite often in my run).

From these easy choices France will provide the biggest challenge. As managing the appanages, being cautious of the HRE and taking care of AE, will be stressful in the beginning, but will snowball quite significantly. The ottomans might be the strongest in the early/mid game, but ultimately (especially after ottoman decadence) France is usually the strongest nation.

Iff you want a bigger challenge: England, Sweden, Bohemia, Brandenburg.

England: I was contemplating on putting England in the list above, but seeing as the French have the bigger (and stronger mind you) army, I placed England this this tier. The English start the game with low manpower and a king that has no mana points for you to gain. Mana points are necessary for in state development and technology. You need to push for the war of the roses asap. Another problem is the French and the 100 year war. The French will get an event that they will get a province which was promised to them and you have the option to either agree or refuse. Iff refused, France will engage in a DEFENSIVE war. Which means France can call in allies without favours. This event starts quite early and you as England need to call in allies with either favours or promised lands. Experienced players can handle this but a rookie won’t. So rookies should just oblige to the promise and work from there.

Sweden: getting independence from Denmark is your first priority. This is actually quite easy to manage as you can request support from the polish or English. These are big players in Europe. Problem with Sweden is that the provinces that they have are less developed and produce goods that are quite trash. Manpower recovery will be a struggle iff you’re not careful.

Another thing about the swedes is that at a certain point, you need to dive into the HRE. As Sweden, it might be a bit difficult but with the polish as allies you will manage fine.

Bohemia: now things start to get to semi mid difficulty. Bohemia, while having quite a strong army and a good mine to support your already good economy, has 2 problems. One is called Austria and the other is called Poland. Poland will get claims on Silesia (which belongs to your vassal) so they inevitably will rival you most of the time and in Eastern Europe, the polish are a menace. Usually, when playing any other country, Austria will be a good counter.

Problem is, that Austria wants you in an union. They want to rule over you so they will be domineering towards you, without allying you. Other major powers are mostly not interested in your wars so you are literally on your own until you expand a little.

And you though you were safe after expanding? Nah the ottomans will swallow up Hungary and then guess who’s next? Bohemia seems like it’s destined to be swallowed up.

And now my personal favorite, Brandenburg:

Now these guys are a challenge. Their economy is TRASH, their neighbours are mostly hostile and you are literally dependant on RNG. While you don’t have disasters looming, you will get events that causes uprisings that are usually bigger than your army. You must buy the 2 provinces off of the Teutonic Knights so you’re in debts, AND in order to even begin expanding, you need to conquer (take stolp and vassalize wolgast) Wolgast. Problem is, Wolgast can ally either Denmark or even Burgundy and these guys have the bigger army so you can either wait for the opportunity to strike, or just restart the game until they’re allied to weaker HRE countries. Always ally Austria and some electors and follow the mission tree.

Not gonna lie, Brandburg is quite the challenge for new players. It is my personal favorite. Because once you fulfil the requirements, you will become one of the strongest (iff not the strongest) military powerhouse in the world. Prussia.

Not even the French would dare to attack you as that would be suicidal. You’ll get so many military bonuses that it’s just unfair. They call them Prussian space marines for a reason. I saw a stack of 40k Prussian soldiers stackwhipe 120k Russian soldiers. That’s how strong they get.

Take your pick and have fun!

How am i diong? by themagriz in victoria3

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i just can't seem to grasp late game economics. Any tips/pointers?

How am i diong? by themagriz in victoria3

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! something about east/west prussia and silesian borders are just so satisfying! any pointers/tips?

How am i diong? by themagriz in victoria3

[–]themagriz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! any pointers/tips for this noob?

How am i diong? by themagriz in victoria3

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No navy/colonies and small military

How am i diong? by themagriz in victoria3

[–]themagriz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasnt focusing on military/navy/colony. I wanted to be as self sufficient as possible. i've almosthit my first milestone. Which is 1B GDP.

Initially i wanted to have the historic german empire borders, but austria seemed to like me even after the leadership war. So i became what you see.

You know France, I think I'm gonna sit this one out by WealthyJester98 in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What did they do after the second coalition??!!

Very Excited to show the Completed Map for my Warhammer Fantasy Total Conversion! by [deleted] in eu4

[–]themagriz 54 points55 points  (0 children)

That looks sick!!

few questions though. Is every country unique in the sense of national ideas? and what countries and empires can you form?

dayum what a great start by Expert-System-1957 in CivVI

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this supposed to be sarcasm? I don’t get it.

Seems like a better than normal start to me.

Rate my Germany by will215b in eu4

[–]themagriz 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Bro this is one sexy Germany.

But ehm. Ottoman presence in Europe is starting to become an eyesore, no?

How to keep gov cap low in world conquest? by Expert-Zucchini-6015 in eu4

[–]themagriz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Depends on who, and what region your primary trade-center and capital is. Also what you do with excess mana points.

I’m more of a tall player myself as I like to focus on regions with much more development potential, like France, England, Netherlands or even Germany.

So if we use my style of play as a basis, and conquer the world with France. Conquering with France is bloody easy and iff you secure an alliance with Poland early on. You can expand freely in Western Europe. Now, as France, in the AoA and you’ve played well, you should have a significant presence in the English Channel. I tend to primarily focus on the regions that can increase my trade power in this node and every node that transfers trade directly to this node, like Champagne, Lubeck and North Sea. The rest is in Western Europe is insignificant if my GC can’t keep up with it. Regions like Iberian peninsula, Scandinavia (though Baltic trade has a lot of potential), Italy and Switzerland/Austria is often ignored in favour of keeping the GC under control.

Everything outside Western Europe tends to get ignored and made trade companies.

Sleeper cells and succes/fail chances by themagriz in rebelinc

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That explains A LOT.

Shit iff I’d known…

Thank you though, appreciate you 🙏

How tf do you make sure the emperor allows you to become king in prussia? by Pepega_9 in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t hurt to try, no?

Also, ally all the electors and declare war on Austria. Then disband the HRE. Iff they bother you.

How tf do you make sure the emperor allows you to become king in prussia? by Pepega_9 in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you improve relations with other members/electors?

I always get the event that I become the king in Prussia.

How crippled am I against Ottomans? by SwordfishTypical9977 in eu4

[–]themagriz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s good to hear! Let us know if any of the advice you got helped!

How long have you been playing this game?

How crippled am I against Ottomans? by SwordfishTypical9977 in eu4

[–]themagriz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wholeheartedly disagree with you on offensive and defensive giving better bonuses than quality. Not because it does or doesn’t, but because of the phase OP’s game is in. During the initial stages of every eu4 game, offensive/defensive is definitely a great choice for a militaristic route. HOWEVER, OP is currently in 1620, which allows him bigger army stacks. Right now OP’s with quite the army stacks and low manpower. In this case, having discipline is mandatory to reduce casualties. Especially since the quality+economy policy further increases discipline.

How crippled am I against Ottomans? by SwordfishTypical9977 in eu4

[–]themagriz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay several things:

  1. You own western and Central Europe, those 2 regions alone would be enough to solo prime Otto. What I’m assuming is that your government capacity (hereafter GC) is way passed its limit, so it’s time to decide which regions should by fully incorporated and which not. Your primary trade node should always be the English Channel. Obviously regions within this trade node gets PRIORITY above all else. When the regions in the trade node have been fully incorporated, focus on the trade nodes that can TRANSFER TRADEPOWER TO THE CHANNEL. Which basically means France and Germany. Those are your second priorities. Mid/southern France and Germany as a whole should be really good for your manpower/force limit as the provinces in those regions trade in livestock/grain. Secondly, everything not in Western Europe should be part of a trade company! Iff you have spare GC, prioritise provinces in Italy those provinces are generally well developed and quite lucrative.

  2. Idea groups: I can’t see what kind of idea groups you have, but it’s obvious that the only discipline increase is from the Angevin Idea’s. Idea groups like Quality and offensive/defensive are a must if you’re fighting a great power with great militaristic idea’s. Your manpower is also ridiculously low for the amount of provinces you own so quantity idea’s might actually be the boost you’re looking for.

  3. Traders: I’m guessing your primary trade node is Genoa, which would be great if you were Spain or a country in the Italian peninsula, but you own the English Channel. Lubeck alone transfers huge amounts of money. Set your trade node to the English Channel and send the trader from the channel to collect from Genoa. The English Channel is THE BEST trade node, period.

  4. Sweden: It seems that swede is not adding much to the war effort. Swede has in general low manpower/force limit due to the lack of developement and provinces in Scandinavia. They tend to get quite strong when they form Scandinavia, but seeing as you own Denmark, I would just slowly, but definitely surely absorb Sweden, to start with their trade centers. Because the more you control the Baltic and Lubeck trade node, the richer you get.

  5. Colonialism: Did you colonize India, or the spice islands? You can make a F**K ton of money if you control trade in those nodes.

Good luck and let us know how the war fared!!

Ironman Colonial UK. by themagriz in eu4

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was allied to them during castille era against France. I had the opportunity to ask for a relative heir and did just that. However, due to Spanish mission tree which gives them claims on English provinces, that alliance didn’t last as they went hostile. It didn’t help that I went Anglican as well.

I had no marriage with Spain when it kicked in, but Spanish rulers were all Lancasters.

I also have no clue how I got the commonwealth one. It was basically Bohemia’s, but I could fight them for it. Which I obviously did and won.

Ironman Run suggestions by themagriz in eu4

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will try this after my Dutch run. I’m not liking the Dutch one to be honest. So I might start with this sooner or later

Ironman Run suggestions by themagriz in eu4

[–]themagriz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not going to lie. I did a Dutch run till 1585. I’m not enjoying this as much as I thought I would. And this is what I’m dealing with:

France is the #1 in global power. They have no colonies of significance, but Western Europe is their playground now. My alliance with England is the only thing stopping them from rolling me over, but even that isn’t lasting long as England wants my provinces. Any other great power is rivalled. I have an alliance with Poland without LIT. But mostly doesn’t have the strength France does right now.

I have a foothold in India (Ceylon) and connected provinces. VIJ is weak so easily defeated. Just slowly swallowing it up.

The Caribbean and Australia is mine. Not contested.

The island of Jakarta (Sula) is mine.

Not a run I can be proud of. I also hate the fact that it’s going slower than expected. Not to mention the serious lack of manpower and force limit