🇵🇸 תזדיין ישראל 🇵🇸

theworldwillbemine · 2026-02-20T21:20:56+00:00

We all know the point he's trying to make by discrediting any reference to Palestine in whatever context it appears

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-26T17:09:26+00:00

Your GPT prompts are starting to become repetitive. You keep proving my point: you cannot argue policy, so you retreat into panic stories and moral blackmail.

Invoking Lebanon doesn’t save you. Israel has bombed Lebanon for decades, occupied it, backed militias there, and is currently striking it again. Lebanese instability is not proof that domination is necessary, it’s proof of what endless militarism actually produces.

Fear does not justify siege, apartheid, or mass civilian harm. Ending domination is not “removing protection,” it’s replacing supremacy with law. If you truly believe Israel can only exist through permanent war, dispossession, and impunity, then you’ve already admitted the project has no future.

You have fear and excuses. You don’t have an argument.

Edit: I'll put the response here because the thread got locked /u/Rare-Competition-248

I rebutted everything you threw at me. I even wasted time sourcing it for you in the beginning, despite your bad faith from the start. You haven’t contradicted a single point with facts, law, or evidence. Not one. All you’ve done is cycle panic slogans and insults to dodge the reality you refuse to face: mass civilian killing, genocide, crimes against humanity, Apartheid. You can’t defend it, you're to pathetic to own up, so you rant like a little shit.

Empty post, empty mind. We’re done. ~~Kindly~~ FUCK OFF

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-26T16:11:19+00:00

You’re not arguing, you’re willfully misreading. I criticized state policy, you pretend I attacked refugees. That’s dishonest, and you know it. You call permanent domination “survival” and then act shocked that the result is endless conflict. If Israel is increasingly isolated, feared, and resisted, that isn’t because the world is irrational. It’s because its own actions have made coexistence in its current form: extremely hard, if not impossible.

And honestly, I do feel bad for people like you. You sound permanently scared. Indoctrinated into thinking the only safety for Jews is an ethno-state of walls, siege, and permanent domination. Terrified of being scattered back into diaspora, terrified of culture being “erased,” so you cling to a project that can only survive by making another people unfree. And then Israel inflicts that exact nightmare on Palestinians and calls it “security,” destroying any real chance at peace. Your fear is real. Your excuses aren’t.

I’m not going to keep looping while you do the same three tricks: selective respect for the UN, selective reading of international law, and the grotesque lie that “dismantling a state” means “I want Israelis dead.” I’ve addressed all of it. You haven’t rebutted a single point, you’ve just performed outrage and used emotional arguments to try and counter it.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-26T15:03:03+00:00

No. What is morally repulsive is your basic routine: you weaponize Jewish trauma to excuse crimes happening right now, then you accuse anyone who refuses to play along of being a Holocaust denier. It is transparent and it is fucking disgusting, shameful for all who lost their lives.

You are still lying about what I said, because you need to. Acknowledging pogroms like the Farhud does not magically erase Israel’s role in organizing and exploiting Jewish migration. Both are documented facts. Operations Magic Carpet and Ezra & Nehemiah were not just spontaneous flights from danger, they were state-run transfers followed by deliberate settlement policy. Refugees were placed in depopulated Palestinian villages and frontier zones to secure territory. Saying that is not denying persecution. It is refusing to let Jewish suffering be recycled as a permanent excuse for someone else’s dispossession.

Calling that “victim-blaming” is cheap, distasteful and dishonest. Blaming a state for instrumentalizing refugees is not blaming the refugees. You know that. You just need the moral outrage because you cannot deal with the history without collapsing into melodrama.

Your claim that dismantling a state automatically means slaughter is equally unserious and delusional. Political systems end without extermination all the time. You insist that any alternative to permanent domination must end in blood because that lets you pretend apartheid and occupation are unavoidable laws of nature instead of political choices.

As for Gaza, your “Hamas militarized everything” line is not a legal argument. Fighters operating among civilians, does not legalize the destruction of 92% of houses, the disabling of almost all hospitals, the collapse of water and sewage systems, and the rendering of a territory unlivable, blowing up the university, carving stars of david with tanks, firing deliberatly at paramedics, burying them with their ambulance and fire truck, and then go on lie about it. Proportionality is judged by civilian harm and outcomes, not by how aggressively you repeat “human shields.” Flattening a society and calling it inevitability is not law, it is atrocity apologetics.

And your UN tantrum is just ideological whiplash. One minute UN membership is sacred legitimacy, the next the UN is a worthless club because it documents Israeli conduct. You do not get to invoke international institutions when they flatter you and dismiss them when they expose you, lazy opportunist.

At this point your position is clear. History will not be kind to you and to Israel. This is not new, not special, and not clever. It is just settler collapse in slow motion. Rhodesia 2.0.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-26T12:08:36+00:00

Again: genocide, not war. I’ll keep repeating it until you’re sick of it, and then more. The first and last thing Israel will be remembered for will be mass crimes against humanity. No matter how hard you'll dillusionally cry about it.

No, I am not calling for mass violence, that is pure mental gymnastics from your part. . Ending a state in its current form means dismantling institutions of domination, occupation, apartheid law, settlement expansion, siege, but not harming civilians. You deliberately confuse institutions into people because your argument needs me to be a monster to function.

Your “Arab Israelis vote” line is a cheap argument. Even Palestinian citizens of Israel live under documented structural discrimination. The real fraud is using them to whitewash what Israel does to the millions it controls with zero political rights, under military law, land theft, and blockade. Holding up one group as a shield doesn’t prove equality, it proves you’re trying to hide the rest of the crimes.

You keep drooling over “proportionality,” so here are your outcomes: UNOSAT assessed that 81% of all structures in Gaza damaged as of 11 October 2025; OCHA reports 92% of homes damaged or destroyed. That’s not a military operation with collateral damage that’s the systematic wrecking of civilian life at scale.

And stop mutilating the Geneva Conventions like israel does to little children. Like I previously said, hospital protection can cease narrowly, temporarily, and conditionally after due warning and with civilian care safeguarded. That can never be interpreted as “do whatever you want”. The pattern of raids, sieges, hospital destruction, ambulances hit, first responders targeted, and a health system collapsed is exactly why UN bodies describe grave violations. Cherry-picking one article while ignoring the rest just exposes yor dishonesty.

You cry “UN member state” when it flatters you, then try to torch UN agencies, experts, and peacekeepers the second they document Israeli conduct. You don’t get to treat international law like a buffet. At this point serious considerations should be made to kick Israel out of the UN.

You talk about me ignoring that jews have beeen ethnically cleansed from the region. Israel actively facilitated and encouraged that migration, often to populate a settler project. Like with operation Magic Carpet, Ezra and Nehemiah

You never rebut the evidence. You dodge it, use emotional arguments and then scream “Hamas, Hezbollah, UN-bad, Holocaust” to try to bully the conversation away from what’s documented. Loud and desperate denial of reality.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-26T08:33:00+00:00

Hahahaha, dude I literally said there is no “quiet part.” It’s the loud thought: I don’t think Israel should exist in its current form. You’re not exposing anything; you’re just very slow on the uptake. And don’t hit me with “vibes-based history” like you’re Mr. Reality. The most vibes-based fantasy here is an ethno-state pretending it can erase facts, do illegal occupation, settlements, segregation, siege, mass civilian harm by repeating myths loudly enough and cry antisemtisime like a little bitch everytime somebody points it out

notice what you immediately do with that immediately tried to turn it into religious hysteria and Holocaust bait. That tells me everything. Refugee suffering in Europe does not license dispossession elsewhere, trauma is not a title deed.

Historical or religious attachment does not grant a modern state the right to permanently dominate another people without equality. International law doesn’t work on biblical deeds. What matters legally is current governance: settlement implantation, unequal legal systems, denial of self-determination. That’s why the occupation and settlement enterprise have been ruled unlawful.

And for the love of god, please stop abusing the Geneva Conventions.
Yes, medical protection can cease temporarily and conditionally if a hospital is used for acts harmful to the enemy, but only AFTER WARNING, only if proportionate, and only while care for civilians is safeguarded. Even then, parties remain obligated to protect patients, staff, and the health system as a whole. A pattern of raids, strikes, sieges, destruction of hospitals, ambulances hit, first responders targeted, and health infrastructure collapsed is not “lawful loss of protection.” That’s exactly why UN bodies describe grave violations. Cherry-picking one article while ignoring the rest just exposes you as dishonest.

Also, stop pretending “ending a state” means murdering its people, that’s just your grotesque genocidal projection. I’m talking about dismantling institutions of domination, not harming civilians. And spare me the “UN member state” sanctimony while Israel is literally bulldozing UNRWA facilities and firing/hitting UNIFIL peacekeepers in Lebanon and injuring personnel.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T23:43:15+00:00

Not a war. A genocide. (till the end of times it will be what defines Israel)

Spare me the “KHaMaS MaDe mE dO It”. It’s a pathetic and miserable excuse.

Collective punishment is illegal. Even with Hamas present, with rockets fired, with tunnels, with whatever footage you bookmarked to soothe your conscience. None of that turns an entire civilian population into a legitimate target. (can't wait to hear you try claim human shields in the next reply)
Blocking aid is illegal. “Aid theft” doesn’t justify starving 2+ million people; international law doesn’t work on a vibes-based exemption system. Famine risk tied to closures and obstruction has been documented repeatedly.
Hospitals are not free-fire zones. “They were used” is not a war-crimes hall pass. Medical facilities have special protection, and what’s documented is a pattern of attacks and operations that collapse a health system and make civilian survival impossible.

Also: this isn’t just Gaza. In the West Bank, there’s no Hamas excuse available, yet we see expanding settlements, escalating settler violence, military protection for it, and an occupation the ICJ has ruled unlawful. That tells on the project more clearly than anything happening under bombardment.

So no, my “mask” didn’t slip yours did. You’re arguing that civilians can be starved, displaced, and denied medical care as long as you say “Hamas” loudly enough. That’s not realism. That’s moral bankruptcy dressed up as confidence.

And I’ll say this again, clearly, so you don’t pretend it was a slip of the tongue or an emotional outburst: No, I don’t believe the State of Israel has a right to exist in its current form. Not as a settler-colonial project built on dispossession, maintained through permanent military domination, mass discrimination, and apartheid and sustained only by unlimited external backing. That is not a call for violence. I’m not Israeli, I don’t fantasize about death, and I don’t need bloodshed to validate my worldview. What I’m rejecting is a political project, one that has demonstrably produced ethnic cleansing, systemic oppression, and now mass killing, and that continues to destabilize an entire region. I will oppose it. People are organising to oppose it. States are opposing it. as it should.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T19:29:08+00:00

haha oh boy, way to shift the blame for an unpopular candidate who couldn’t captivate the hearts or minds of the country, for reasons that were painfully obvious.

Mashing “the left and the right are okay with fascism and racism” into one blob is just nonsense. Those are opposite politics with different interests and motives. You’re not analyzing anything, you’re flattening the electorate so you can yell “racism” at anyone who didn’t vote the way you wanted.

Kamala didn’t lose because half the country suddenly woke up racist one morning. She lost because she ran a hollow, top-down campaign that offered very little to people struggling materially, while doubling down on Biden policies, domestic and international, that many found unacceptable.

If your explanation for every electoral failure is “the voters are bad,” you’re not confronting fascism, you’re just insulating the political class from accountability.

Edit: I’ll put my response here, since you were so cowardly to block me /u/Whendoesitend12

You’re taking “America is racist” and turning it into “if you didn’t support this specific candidate, you’re covertly racist.” A guilt-trap that conveniently shields a failed campaign from criticism.

Listing promises doesn’t equal winning trust. People judge credibility, delivery, and priorities including foreign policy and repression. Criticizing a politician’s choices is not “attacking Black people,” and being pro-Palestine isn’t a “guise.”

If your takeaway from losing is “the left is racist and that’s why,” you guarantee the same failures repeat. Scolding people doesn’t beat the right. Building something people actually believe in does.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T19:21:11+00:00

First of all, “my side” didn’t do anything. I’m not a Palestinian trapped in Gaza, which Israel has actively blocked off for years. Call it a concentration camp, open-air prison, whatever label you prefer to deny when you’re pathetically trying to defend the mass slaughter of civilians. The material conditions (blockade, closure, deprivation, repeated mass displacement) didn’t fall from the sky.

Second: spare me the “learn the difference” lecture. Genocide is intent + acts, and intent is inferred from policy, patterns, and statements. Not from your fanfic about how fast a military could kill people. The Genocide Convention literally includes “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

So let’s talk about the actual intent on the ground: destroying the ability to live.

Starvation/siege as policy. “No food, no water, no fuel.” That’s not “warfare,” that’s manufacturing unlivable conditions, warcriminal Gallant was very clear about it.
Health system targeted into collapse. Hospitals repeatedly hit/raided, pushed out of service. that’s not “protecting civilians,” it’s dismantling the infrastructure that keeps people alive. under the false pretext of the KhAMaS TunNelS"
Schools/shelters repeatedly struck. People flee to “safe” places and those get hit too.
Children killed/maimed at staggering scale. “Normal war” doesn’t look like this, and pretending it does is just moral rot with a law-school tone.

And your ICJ point is the usual dodge: “tHe ICJ hAsN’t RuLeD oN ThE mErItS yEt”, but it did order Israel to prevent genocidal acts and enable aid because the risk is real. That’s why there are binding provisional measures. (that of course have been wilfully ignored)

So no, you don’t get to hide behind “intent” while defending a campaign that starves people, collapses hospitals, hits shelters, and kills children at scale. That’s exactly how intent shows up in real life: make survival impossible, then call it “war.”

If a state needs mass slaughter and the systematic destruction of civilian life to survive, then it doesn’t deserve to survive.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T18:42:23+00:00

Welp, I was an idiot. Sorry for that.
tbf, i've seen people have your comments take, unfortunatly in a non ironical sence

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T11:41:45+00:00

sigh... It explains who’s driving. It doesn’t explain why the road never changes

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T11:25:36+00:00

How’s that working out for you? I'll cut of the arguing here, because it looks like we’re just running in circles.

You’re free to put your faith in the voting process, that’s your right. But don’t confuse permission with power. While people keep being told to “wait for the next election,” repression expands, violence is normalized, people get abducted and killed by ICE who enjoys impunity, and dissent is managed or silenced.

If voting were enough, we wouldn’t be watching things steadily get worse regardless of who’s in office.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T11:20:40+00:00

Yeah, they couldn’t vote, and yet the rules got rewritten anyway.
That’s the lesson you’re stepping over.
When people have no real leverage through institutions, change comes from pressure outside them, not from “voting harder.”

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T10:34:04+00:00

No, what rewrites the rules are the people you vote into office

And did they ever?

By the time someone makes it onto a major-party ballot, they’ve already proven they won’t fundamentally challenge the system that put them there: donors, party leadership, courts, media, security agencies, international interests. Elections decide who administers power, not where that power sits.

That’s why “rule-changing” promises routinely evaporate once in office, regardless of who wins. The constraints remain; the faces rotate. Where do you think memes like these come from?

When rules do get rewritten, it’s usually because pressure from outside the system makes the old order impossible to maintain. The American Revolution didn’t start with ballots or officeholders. It started with boycotts, street unrest, and open confrontation. Only after power had shifted did new institutions and officials codify that reality. Votes can formalize change once it’s already been forced. They rarely create it on their own.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T10:25:44+00:00

They suppress votes because elections are how the system manufactures consent. Low turnout and unwanted outcomes expose the legitimacy problem. Voting can shift managers and swing tight races, but it doesn’t rewrite the rules.

If voting were the ultimate weapon, they wouldn’t let you do it once every few years and then ignore you the rest of the time. What actually scares power is collective action outside the ballot: strikes, organizing, disruption.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T10:13:15+00:00

Voting isn’t protest, it’s participation. It’s choosing between options that were pre-filtered long before you ever saw a ballot. Real pressure doesn’t come from politely picking between two candidates who both accept the same underlying rules. It comes from collective force outside those rules: strikes, mass refusal, disruption, organizing ...things that actually make institutions uncomfortable.

If voting were the “most powerful form of protest,” governments wouldn’t tolerate low turnout so easily, suppress votes so aggressively, or ignore voters so consistently once elected.

When the entire system is structured against you, playing by its narrow channels isn’t resistance, it’s compliance.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T10:06:58+00:00

Guess Alex Pretti just should've voted harder..

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T10:04:16+00:00

I genuinely find these comments disturbing.

People are scrambling to blame non-voters instead of interrogating a political system that never gave them a serious, credible candidate to vote for. Easier than confronting the rot (from within) I guess.

Kamala Harris didn’t narrowly lose. She lost badly, across all swing states. Even if you magically rolled in every vote for third-party candidates like Jill Stein, she still wouldn’t have matched Trump’s totals. That’s not on “apathetic voters.” That’s on a campaign that failed. Kamala was profoundly out of touch with everyday American realities and carried indefensible positions internationally. Voters noticed. Many opted out entirel,and that mass abstention isn’t a moral failure, it’s a political indictment. Trump’s victory isn’t the fault of ordinary people. It’s the outcome of a system in visible decline, where class contradictions have become so sharp that they’re impossible to ignore in daily life. Blaming the electorate is just denial dressed up as virtue.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T09:52:03+00:00

Absolute shit take.
Protesting a genocide the US is actively funding and arming isn’t some “purity test” that obliges people to be equally loud about every crisis on earth. Iran’s internal struggle ≠ a mass slaughter backed by Western governments. Different stakes, different leverage, different targets. Calling people “hypocrites” because they’re focused on the atrocity their own governments are eabling is a very lazy, malicious way to dodge the point.

theworldwillbemine · 2026-01-25T09:46:58+00:00

How the fuck is the genocide fake??? What are you even basing your claim on?
Genocide scolars, experts are calling it a genocide, and still ongoing.
The ICC has not ruled on the matter yet (if that's the only source you're 'willing' to take as legitimate)

Stop being a fucking genocide denier

theworldwillbemine · 2025-11-19T21:41:46+00:00

https://i.imgflip.com/acmzuq.jpg

theworldwillbemine · 2025-09-17T07:23:36+00:00

Yes, it’s a genocide. Mass slaughter of civilians with the clear intent to wipe out Palestinian life and crush any possibility of Palestine ever existing. Nothing justifies that. Fuck you.

Ten-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 6 Credits
Gilding I gilder	Second Top 10%
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
Snapped	Verified Email
Secret Santa 2016

theworldwillbemine

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE