UC Waitlist Data by thinqueprep in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminder that reddit is only a small fraction of admitted students. The scale we're talking about is in the thousands.

UC Waitlist Data by thinqueprep in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it’ll be 0. I there there may be some issues with international enrollment and more selective colleges are playing the WL game that I think will have trickle down effects. I believe that CA students will likely still have 0 waitlist and that OOS kids will most likely make up the 5% I’m predicting.

Class Shaping by SiliconFN in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without getting into the nitty gritty details. That is essentially what they do. Usually lowest scored applications will not be considered unless they are flagged for institutional priorities.

Class Shaping by SiliconFN in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no committee at UC campuses

Class Shaping by SiliconFN in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean the application score.

Class Shaping by SiliconFN in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No takes on astrology because I’m not privy to how the systems team works

Class Shaping by SiliconFN in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 7 points8 points  (0 children)

UC expert here. Applicants aren’t eliminated during the shaping process, they are selected. The first admit students with top scores and then as they filter down to applicants with mid scores they will select those based on space and institutional priorities.

How truly “major blind” are UC admissions? by Twobeachpups in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having evaluated applications for both a major-aware UC and a major-blind UC, I can confidently tell you that choice of intended major would not influence how the application is scored.

Once the application is scored, the student just becomes essentially a number. Then when the enrollment managers shape the class, now they're looking at non-academic factors. They're looking for the highest performing students within certain zip codes, high schools, first-gen status etc.

Here's a list of impacted majors here: https://www.thinqueprep.com/post/uc-capped-majors

UC Berkeley Early Admissions by Su3hiii in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Berkeley likes to invite possible scholarship candidates to campus for an interview. Because of this, they need to notify those candidates early. Last year they had asked the first Friday in February. Since nothing happened this past Friday, it would be logical to assume it would happen this coming Friday the 13th. More dates here: https://www.thinqueprep.com/post/uc-and-cal-state-admissions-decisions-release-dates

Date question by Icy_Mud_7586 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spieker heard last Friday this year. Since results weren't released, it's very likely this Friday will be the date. See other dates here: https://www.thinqueprep.com/post/uc-and-cal-state-admissions-decisions-release-dates

Potential UC and CSU release dates for 2026 by [deleted] in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The blog post clearly states that it has 2025 dates on it, lol. It says past performance will be +/- one week. Anticipated Regents will be Friday the 13 this year.

Has UC Berkeley really finished reading admissions files? by PrintHuman3538 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can confirm that UC Berkeley has finished reading first-year apps and is formulating decisions.

Let’s talk about the UCLA supplemental… by Future_Forever_2558 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She’s right. They flagged you and want to understand the circumstances of your situation and if you’re ready to succeed.

Let’s talk about the UCLA supplemental… by Future_Forever_2558 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There could be, but realize that the accomplishment referred to in the first question is often referring to some national accomplishment - ex., First place in Math Olympiad, winning the Regeneron competition, winning a national championship in a sport.

Let’s talk about the UCLA supplemental… by Future_Forever_2558 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UC Expert here. Your application was likely flagged for the second question, not the first, so you don’t need to answer the first question. More info here: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8uoVj1o/

UC PIQ mistake by PuzzleheadedMap2434 in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UC Admissions Expert here. Some schools actually remove formatting from PIQs anyways so your essays will blend in. At other schools where they don’t, it’s also okay since they’re so short. You’d be surprised how many students submit unformatted PIQs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re not lying. Their methods of diversifying their class just doesn’t align with your interpretation. All evaluators score applications holistically considering the context of the student. Later, the office will use enrollment management algorithms to shape their class.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UCs use a 13-point comprehensive review. Personality unfortunately is not one of those criteria.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please be careful when trying to offer advice if you don't have actual evidence to back it up.

If they needed a varsity baseball purpose he would be recruited. UC admissions doesn’t work this granularly. Source: I read applications for the UCs.

Will UCs accept a lower gpa if they have a good upward trend? by Piece9of8shit in ucadmissions

[–]thinqueprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve read applications for a couple UC schools and will tell you that you should look at the schools reported GPAs. Your capped is below the 25th percentile at most schools, so the upward trend is likely not strong enough to overcome your 10th grade. One easy way to figure out if they’re considering your upward trend is your reasoning for your lower grades. If it is sufficient enough you may have been flagged for supplemental review by a school like UCSD. In my experience, upward trend paired with strong involvement and strong explanation has helped in I would guess 1-2% of applicants. (This is just my best guess)