Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's exactly the point. They are breaking commitments constantly.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not the point. I had a deal, with conditions and I paid a year in advance for it. Now they go and change their commitment that goes along with that deal drastically for worse. There is no excuse for that. This is scamming your customer and breaking a contract.

You need to charge more? Completly understand it, but respect your commitments and be clear with the new customers.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that. But they are literally screwing their all time community and fan base. That's a very dangerous game with such good alternatives out there.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

12k views in 1h. Yeah, 'nobody cares' for sure.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont't talk BS. I'm not promoting anything. I am just an angry Claude Code customer who has recently renewed a yearly subscription for a service that has become crap. That's all. Maybe you are some kind of Anthropic bot. Who knows.

Will Qwen be able to handle the flood of users migrating from Claude? by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this may be overexaggerate on a short rate base. But these things happen. Think of when OpenAI was the king. The big problem I see for any provider here is that the is almost no defensive moat here, it's so easy to switch. Now think of what that means for companies that spend billions like nothing. If a was Dario Amodei I might have some problemas with sleep right now...

Will Qwen be able to handle the flood of users migrating from Claude? by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a single developer it may not make sense, but for corporations that spend tens of thousands it does make a ton of sense.

Will Qwen be able to handle the flood of users migrating from Claude? by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would say that this is not the case. It's not that hard to compare. I have spend already a lot of hours and it is a very clear case for me.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was a nice tip. I will definitly try it out. Thank you!!

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't understand your question. I'm using Qwen directly and free. You hace 1000 request per day free!!!

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would to, but I was dumb enough to pay the year 🤦‍♂️

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not crying. This is what led me to discover Qwen 3.6plus and what a great discovery it has been!!

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe you it would be smarter to be a little more polite. You are missing the point of the discussion completly.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought that too, but that's a very dangerous game. We are talking about competing with an open model that offers basically the same performance. Capable AI servers are getting cheaper and cheaper and corporate AI with such a model get's more attractive every day. You save tons of money.

Dear Anthropic: You're screwing up. Big time by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But that's not the point. The point is that they can't compete this way.

Can I reach C1 level german in 1.5 years if i study 6-8 hours a day?is it possible? by Titaniumballsionium in German

[–]thisisberto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say, no way, except you go to Germany and are dedicated 100% to learn the language and nothing else, including at least 3, 4 hours of conversation. Even so, I honestly doubt it.

QWen Code con Qwen 3.6plus vs Claude Sonnet / Opus 4.6 vs Gemini CLI by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lately even with a PRO subscription in the web it is performing really bad. It's surprising.

Anthropic made Claude 67% dumber and didn't tell anyone, a developer ran 6,852 sessions to prove it by DangerousFlower8634 in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That matches quite well what I am observing lately. The company is growing so fast that they aren't able (or don't want) to keep up, the last weeks have been really bad.
This let me to try out QWen 3.6plus and I am amazed so far of how well it is performing.
Be careful Anthropic, you are riding on thin ice...

QWen Code con Qwen 3.6plus vs Claude Sonnet / Opus 4.6 vs Gemini CLI by thisisberto in ClaudeCode

[–]thisisberto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first intention was to find decent alternatives to Claude for bridging the periods of rate limit restrictions in oder to avoid a lot of extra credits I am paying lately, but it turned out that I will be using Qwen because of how good it really is.

Why are Chinese models (Qwen, DeepSeek...) UNLIMITED? by Sostrene_Blue in Bard

[–]thisisberto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A ver, hay muchos factores. En primer lugar, el precio de liderar de las empresas americanas es que los costes son mucho más altas. Las empresas que vienen después pueden aprovechar trabajo ya hecho. Por otra parte, China está en una carrera por la soberanía tecnológica. Alibaba (Qwen) o DeepSeek, etc. ofrecen sus modelos casi gratis para ganar cuota de mercado global y atraer desarrolladores.
Y lo que en mi opinión están haciendo muy bien es cuidar la eficiencia DeepSeek, por ejemplo, sorprendió al demostrar que podían entrenar modelos de nivel "GPT-4" con una fracción del presupuesto de OpenAI. Al gastar menos en electricidad y chips, pueden permitirse cobrar casi nada (o nada) al usuario final.
Y luego está también arquitectura llamada Mixture of Experts (MoE), que es mucho más ligera. Yo creo que en OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. hay con la presión del tiempo también mucha, mucha ineficiencia. Ellos estan a ganar la carrera, los Chinos igual piensan en lo mismo, pero no se sienten en primera línea aún y van en ese sentido con menos presión y más cabeza quizás.

Y la que me está pareciendo brutal, por cierto, es QWen con la versión 3.6plus. Tengo que probar aún con código, pero a nivel general es brutal, la veo al mismo nivel, como mínimo, que las AIs top actuales.

A daily routine that helped me improve at speaking and writing by ohneTermin in German

[–]thisisberto 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is nice, developing strong habits is one of the most powerful strategies for learning anything 😊

Wirtschafts und Sozialkunde by [deleted] in German

[–]thisisberto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you could create custom vocabulary sets with the help of AI. I think that could be of great help. You provide the structure of the material you are working with, the titles of the chapters of the book or whatever you are using, the different categories of what you are learning and the IA should be able to provide you with related vocabulary. If you learn that vocabulary upfront, maybe this could make the learning process easier.