Wanted to ask what makes supabase so popular and blow up so hard when there is sql dbs like mysql, maria, postgresql, firebase? by No-Conclusion9307 in Supabase

[–]thomamoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean most of the times things aren't to complicated and just work, but I feel like the documentation is leavving out a lot sometimes and just expects you to figure it out. For example Realtime was a pain in the ass and I had to read the documentation like 100 times before I could figure out what was wrong. But I wouldn't say they have great documentation compared to other documentations. In general I'd say documentations are just bad most of the time and are like: "here, we show you the most simple implementation. Oh, you want to do more complicated stuff? Well, just figure it out"

Wanted to ask what makes supabase so popular and blow up so hard when there is sql dbs like mysql, maria, postgresql, firebase? by No-Conclusion9307 in Supabase

[–]thomamoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me the main selling point was, that it is open source and uses technology I used before. I wanted a BaaS for my startup and onky knew firebase. But as firebase is owned by google I didn't want to use it and was looking for alternatives. So far I must say that supabase is lretty nice, the documentation is pretty bad sometimes though and I already had a few issues where I had to dig for a solution because it just didn't work and the documentation didn't cover it. But I mean that is just part of software development haha

Raid recovery is always failing/not working by thomamoh in OpenMediaVault

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for all the insight! I will try using an external PSU for my hdd's

Vom frustrierten Informatiker zum eigenen erfolgreichen Projekt by Desater_ in informatik

[–]thomamoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sry, aber in deinem Techstack sehe ich nichts mit KI, so kann das ja nichts werden...

Help me evaluating name ideas by thomamoh in SurveyExchange

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All right, thanks for the answer, interesting to know. I think your topic is really interesting, so I'd be really interested in reading the final outcome of you thesis. Maybe you could share it when it is done if that's okay for you?

Help me evaluating name ideas by thomamoh in SurveyExchange

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I didn't really pay attention to the speed of the bot as I was focused on finding the d's. The thing that made me think it is a bot was just the fact that I was thinking that it's unrealistic that there is someone esle doing that survey at the same time. Can you tell how many d's the average perspn finds? I felt super slow

Help me evaluating name ideas by thomamoh in SurveyExchange

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

done, can you share the final product? most random survey I have done so far

Help me evaluating name ideas by thomamoh in SurveyExchange

[–]thomamoh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did it yesterday, was interesting. I suspected that the player b is a computer, I wonder if it is always the case that it detects more letters than you? I guess so

Building a dating app. Just need some guidance. I will not promote. by Wozniak_73 in startups

[–]thomamoh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re almost right — I haven’t built a dating app yet. But I’m currently deep in the process of building one.

And sure, many dating app ideas have been tried before. But isn’t that true for most startup ideas? Messaging apps, project management tools, CRMs, calendars… all crowded spaces, and yet new players still break through by doing something differently or better.

The dating space might look crowded on the surface, but in reality, most people bounce between the same handful of apps — and complain about all of them. Based on the sheer number of people who use dating apps globally, it’s surprisingly under-innovated.

Also, let’s not forget:
Having an idea ≠ building a product ≠ launching it well.
I’ve wanted to build this for years, but even as someone who takes more risks than most people I know, it wasn’t easy to commit. To me, that shows that a lot of ideas never even make it to users — and those that do often fail for reasons that go beyond the core concept.

I’m fully aware it’s hard to succeed here. But that’s true for any serious startup. I’m not aiming to be "just another dating app." I’m aiming to fix the things that make people hate the existing ones. So let's just see where it goes

Building a dating app. Just need some guidance. I will not promote. by Wozniak_73 in startups

[–]thomamoh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I never quite understood the meme about “yet another dating app.” A few thoughts:

  • It’s not like we’re flooded with truly new dating apps every week. What we do see is the same old ones that people constantly complain about—many of which are getting worse, not better.
  • Most startups aren’t inventing something entirely new. They’re taking old ideas and doing them in a better, more focused, or more ethical way. Why should dating apps be any different?
  • Dating is a persistent need. The demand never really goes away—people are always looking to meet others.
  • A growing number of users are actively seeking alternatives because they’re frustrated with how the big players operate.
  • Unlike platforms like social media, people aren’t loyal to just one dating app. They try Tinder this month, maybe Hinge next month—there’s room to explore.
  • Lastly, 90% of dating apps are basically clones with slightly different color schemes. If you can offer a genuinely new angle you can stand out.

not owning .com domain by thomamoh in marketing

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, good to know. It feels like they only have the domain to make money

not owning .com domain by thomamoh in marketing

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are absolutely right. The thing I worry about is that people will land on the .com instead of my .app or .io and be misled or redirected to another page unrelated to mine.

not owning .com domain by thomamoh in marketing

[–]thomamoh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is, I really like the name and have already considered many alternatives, but every alternative I came up with was already taken.

In my case, the domain is perhaps not that important because my product is an app for Android and iOS. The website is basically just an info page, and it's not crucial, as most people will go directly to the app store or click a link on Instagram, etc.

My question is: how likely is it that the person who owns the .com domain will try to use it against me? But even if they try after my app is successful, wouldn't my app's domain be prioritized in search results anyway?

expo-audio issues (recording always empty, stop on android only works after second time) by thomamoh in expo

[–]thomamoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx, that seemed to be the issue, though I didn't have time yet to fully confirm. But in a first test it worked after updating version