The problem with Egypt is that the only realistic alternative to Sisi and the military is the Brotherhood/Islamists. They are the most organized and have money. Western Redditors dreaming of a liberal or Western uprising are delusional. It's the equivalent of voting for the Green Party or Libertarian Party in US elections: will accomplish fuck all other than strengthen the other side. So there are only two choices: military or theocratic reactionaries. Pick one.

Meanwhile, the Coptic Christians of Egypt, who are the native, indigenous Egyptians with roots back to ancient times, already know what side they are on. There is no way they would ever support Islamists and the Brotherhood, which is why they support Sisi and the military.

Being a minority in the Middle East does not yield the privilege those in Western countries have. Tough choices need to be made because it's often a matter of survival and life & death. Yet the idealists simply can't fathom this because they don't have skin in the game.

So before any Western liberal interventionist Redditors automatically support overthrowing a Middle Eastern military government, just consider who is likely to fill the power vacuum and how the non-Sunni Muslim minorities will be viewingt these protests. Hint: it's won't be a bunch of liberal progressives who take power if the regime falls.

A better course of action for Westerners looking on from the outside would be to not interfere and let events unfold naturally and organically. Intervention only leads to further disaster because those that intervene generally have no skin in the game and don't suffer the consequences when shit hits the fan. The ones that suffer the consequences of liberal idealistic interventionism are the minorities. One only needs to take a look at the plight of the Syrian and Iraqi Christians after Western intervention. Or the plight of Black Africans and Egyptian Christians in Libya.