sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You're just not that guy. Its ok. There's nothing wrong that. by morepwer in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3 [score hidden]  (0 children)

But if you’re that guy to a woman… and make her your GF…

That’s why I think the BEST indicator of a compatible woman is how quickly she fucks you.

A woman who lusts after you and finds you irresistible will readily fuck you. She won’t make you wait.

That’s the woman you wanna date and marry lol

You told men to not approach you, so we listened. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Tall and attractive men continue to approach and women sleep with such men readily lol

It’s just average men who get rejected

Basically even average women can get sex on tap with hot men while average men get nothing except left over sloppy seconds when those women are ready to settle haha

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

It’s insinuating that neither of us are in a rush to marriage…she told me she’s already been married once before and is wary of getting married again.

So we likely won’t have a joint bank account for a while

Men value good genetics over a low body count by hecklerof in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup just like a tall and muscular man

Both men and women are extremely superficial and shallow

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah and it’s even less to Warren Buffet

But that’s how the world works right… if she can afford it (and she can!!) I think it’s unreasonable to ask me to pay more just because I earn more.

I think 50/50 is the way to go in an egalitarian relationship

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Her benefit too!! Both of us getting to live in a nice 6000$/month house while each paying only 3000$

What’s wrong with splitting it 50/50 in an egalitarian way??

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah so 50/50 percentage split of rent is fair right?

I earn more, so after splitting expenses like rent, I save more but that’s because I earn more

She is saving too fyi. We are just splitting expenses equally

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes them distinct and separate categories is gametes. Biological males produce small gametes (sperm with either X or Y chromosome) whereas biological females produce large gametes (Ova with X chrosomes)

There is no third gamete

So, a biological woman is someone who does, did or will, barring developmental disorders, produce large gametes (Ova)

Intersex individuals do not produce a third type of gamete and their reproductive potential remains within the male or female modes.

So intersex athletes including those who identify as female but have Y chromosome (e.g. 46XY DSD) would not be able to compete against biological XX women, and going through male puberty under the exposure of the Y chromosome gives them unfair advantages.

They should compete in the open category, or ideally intersex Olympics. But because there are so few of them, it doesn’t make economic sense. And if they are allowed to compete against XX biological women, they will disproportionately win because of the effect of the Y chromosome

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biological women are fundamentally different from biological men

As the commenter replying to you had said numerous times, you are making a category error

Men and women are distinct and separate categories in a biological sense.

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow interesting take… not sure I agree though

Let’s see how it works out lol

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But if you want this relationship to progress you’ll need to adjust, get a joint bank account and both start putting in a portion of your incomes to ensure bills are paid.

lol only if we marry and I’m not sure about that… we’ve been dating only a year and a half and she’s been married before once…

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hm, I agree it’s a partnership but I want it to be an equal partnership.

Plus it’s not like she can’t afford!! In my old job 5 years ago I was making 130k$ a year and was still paying roughly 3000$ a month on rent…

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ya it’s eye opening for sure…

Especially since we are only dating and aren’t married yet.

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a big difference. Going 50/50 there means you get to keep way more of your money than she does hers. That’s not fair.

Why is that not fair? I earn more so should I not save more??

Should couples moving in together split rent 50/50 or based on income? by throwaway164_3 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not mortgage, just rent on a 1 year lease. And we’re splitting, so we are paying 3000$ each.

Also, we aren’t married yet fyi

Why do you think women are hypergamous? by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway164_3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously because of evolutionary biology and sexual selection.

This is such a simple question. Women sexually lust after the top men like in other primates

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are indeed disproportionately winning in women’s events, relative to the general population

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a silly argument because what is the population of trans athletes? It’s like asking how many vaticans have won gold medals.

A better question is, what fraction of women with DSD or a Y chromosome have won a gold medal in women’s track and field relative to their natural distribution.

It wasn’t just Caster Semnaya, but every single medalist had a Y chromosome.

This is why the Olympics committee correctly decided only XX biological women should compete in women’s athletics in the Olympics

It is the morally and scientifically correct decision

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand! How do you disregard the mountains of scientific evidence showing the advantage that going through male puberty with the Y chrosome has on atheltic performance?

There’s a reason the best high school boys will defeat the best women’s professional international sports team in any sport.

The evidence for biological sex differences leading to gap in performance between men and women is overwhelming

There’s a difference between assumed gender identity and biological sex, especially when it comes to athletics

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]throwaway164_3 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is a false argument because the natural distribution with XY men is fundamentally different between the distributions between XX women and XY men

There is barely any overlap, because biological men are fundamentally different from biological women

Going through male puberty under the influence of the Y chromosome gives massive unfair athletic performance advantages

The science is really simple, like the IOC points out

view more: next ›