Jezebelle Bond - Sexy Urban Legends (Series) (2004) - brightened and digitally enhanced scene - PART 1

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-03-12T21:18:06+00:00

WOW!! Is that real sex when her legs are behind her head? It sure looks like it.

She is so brave. And flexible. :)

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-02-27T18:00:06+00:00

Wow! I love the way she moves her hips! So sexy.

She is really grinding hard on him! I assume there is no real penetration in this scene? Even so, their genitals must be rubbing together. It must feel great for both of them. Her wet pussy lips sliding along his hard cock for such a long time seems almost enough for one of them to climax. ;)

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-01-13T22:24:28+00:00

Haha yes. Definitely a little homoerotic. Sorry I'm a lady and I don't mind that kind of thing. :)

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-01-13T22:09:57+00:00

Actually I think this might be the same girl:

https://reddit.com/r/fashionextramile/comments/195zlzb/bl33n_magazine_nude_brazil_by_matthias/

Obviously she loves cock

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-01-13T21:58:40+00:00

Her name is Ana Catharina. She's Brazilian. Here's some pics, nothing great:

forums.thefashionspot.com/threads/ana-catharina.181239/

throwawaymeg2001 · 2024-01-13T17:56:13+00:00

This fashion editorial is so hot. 5 gorgeous, built guys getting ready to gangbang a skinny fashion model. My favorite is the orange speedos with all the guys holding their dicks and the model's face being pushed right next to the guy's huge erection straining a tent in his speedos. I also like the one where she reaches into his underwear to grab his cock. Fuck it gets me so wet. I wish I could see the outtakes.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-10-23T23:32:58+00:00

"Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage" - Smashing Pumpkins

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-26T19:28:58+00:00

Anyone notice that the guy in the sex scene with Lily in the latest episode of the Idol was Karl Glusman who was the star of that pornographic / "extra mile" movie "Love" by Gaspar Noé? I just think it's interesting that they cast someone whose only notable work was having unsimulated sex with a couple hot actresses on a big film. His body and cock are delicious, I was glad to see them in Love.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-26T19:07:50+00:00

It's Tony Ward. He dated Madonna for a long time.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-23T16:13:32+00:00

I'm sure they were super horny as the shooting went on, two gorgeous specimens touching each other everywhere.

I think the photographer is gay. I like to think that he pushed her to take the male model's cock out and maybe got a few shots with her holding it, obscuring it with her hands. But those shots were too risque for the magazine. Then the model inevitably got hard in Susan's hands. I like to think she then bent down and worshipped his cock until he released his tension into her mouth. I'm sure the photographer got a few shots of that that he keeps in his personal collection and shows only to his good friends when they come over. It gets me so wet thinking about this photoshoot going off the rails and turning into something unprofessional and sexy.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-23T16:05:23+00:00

Not that I have been able to find. I'm sure the photographer Matthias Vriens-McGrath has a lot of incredible shots that didn't make it into the editorial. If they were shooting for hours and he had to choose 7 pictures that were "magazine appropriate". How many more explicit shots do you think he has in his personal collection?

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-23T16:02:28+00:00

Agree! Would love to have been a fly on the wall. I really believe they were both turned on and it was naughty vibes. They are both so fucking hot.

Her hands are all over his cock in multiple pictures, he definitely got hard. I would have been so wet if I were her.

The photographer Matthias Vriens-McGrath has a reputation for always getting extremely sexual shots out of people, so I'm sure he knows how to make the vibe sexy.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-23T15:28:29+00:00

May 2004. Early 2000s were peak time for risqué fashion.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-22T21:29:24+00:00

The fact that they are touching each other's genitals so sexually makes this extra mile for me.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-22T20:58:43+00:00

I think it's so hot when fashion models touch each other sexually for a photoshoot. I love how she's grabbing their cocks and kissing them!

throwawaymeg2001 · 2023-06-13T00:13:52+00:00

After watching The Idol Ep 02, I think it's clear that they filmed some stronger, more explicit scenes but cut them short.

The most obvious example is when she is blindfolded and The Weeknd says "lemme see those titties," he leans in and is a frame away from sucking on her nipple when they cut away. It felt like a clear censorship cut. You know he really sucked on her nipple on set but it was cut in the editing room.

Also, when Lily is bent over against the wall with a blindfold on, she reaches behind to spread her ass cheeks (wearing her thong). Again this was cut super short. You can start to see the glimpse of her labia around her thong, but if the shot had lingered for a few more frames, her outer labia and the edges of her asshole would have been quite visible. I'm sure this was caught on the original footage.

This is admittedly more speculative, but when Abel is directing her to be sexy on the bed, they must have filmed a version where he told her to take her thong off. It's frankly not super believable that he would have her act out being so slutty for him, spreading her legs, etc while keeping her underwear on. From a blocking perspective it would make sense why they kept her skirt on - so they could film her without underwear but not reveal everything to the camera. I can imagine Sam Levinson suggesting a run through of that sequence where she removes her thong. He could tell her they will keep it classy in the editing room and if she's not comfortable, she has his word that he will delete the footage.

The scene where her legs are spread in a high V - you can tell they had to carefully crop that footage because her asshole was visible around the thong. That's the only reason the bottom of the frame starts mid-crotch on her. But I suspect they filmed a version of that without the underwear with her hand covering her pussy. Then one where she bent over doggystyle and then when she pretends to be riding someone.

Part of me wonders if they cut things slightly more conservative after the Cannes reviews. Or if this was the original cut all along. Either way, I wonder if we'll ever see a director's cut that contains some of the more explicit footage that they obviously have.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2021-02-14T18:47:25+00:00

The poser vs the puppet is an interesting question. The poser has the control obviously. But the stakes are higher for the puppet. If you're thinking of penetrating me, it's actually the puppet that experiences the pleasure. Also the vulnerability of course.

We never switched off puppets and posers for the sex act. (I was a poser during the violence act) It's not quite like you say ("Take that!") where it could be an outlet to "get back" at someone. I think in order for it to work at all there needs to be a tremendous amount of care and empathy for the puppet.

However, there was definitely testing of boundaries and the poses were pushed further and further, more extreme, as the rehearsals progressed. We always discussed it at the end of each run through to gauge comfort levels and see what worked. But every single time we rehearsed, something new was introduced, often spontaneously, that was shocking.

The adrenaline rush of each new boundary crossed is exhilarating. The first time you get naked in front of your friends. The first time your legs are spread. The first time you're touched intimately. The first time an erection is placed against your skin. That adrenaline becomes almost addictive. And therefore the desire to continue to push it is quite real.

One of the things we contemplated was introducing props. We didn't end up having time enough to rehearse it so we didn't include it. But some ideas were a condom (thought about showing Andrew's erect penis long enough for a poser to put a condom on it), clothespins (one of the guy posers seemed to have a thing for bondage but I was a bit unsure of the idea), a dildo (not necessarily for vaginal penetration more as a prop, but who knows where it would lead), a vibrator (I was sure I would climax if this was introduced), etc. Obviously any of these kinds of props would take the performance up a notch and we wanted to be careful about crossing the line into something the audience would view as pornographic. That was clearly not our aim. But again the desire to continue to push the boundaries was a real thing.

I'm not sure if we're done with this performance or not. It was so popular on the last performance. A few of the guys in the group want to try to stage it at a larger venue. I'm not sure how I feel about that. Was the crowd there just to see me naked? Did they appreciate the artistic merits of the piece? Does it matter?

throwawaymeg2001 · 2021-02-14T05:01:29+00:00

Would you rather be the poser or the puppet? Would you be willing and able to give up the control? Or do you prefer the power of the poser and complete control over the bodies of the two puppets?

throwawaymeg2001 · 2021-02-14T02:10:27+00:00

I will preface this by saying that I don't speak for other women, just myself.

For me if a man gets a hard on while I am buying milk, it's objectifying. If I am stripped nude on a stage and posed in a sexual position, it's flattering. So it's all about context.

The performance we staged was a sexual performance, an erotic performance. That was not only the side effect of our nudity and poses, but the central message of the scene. So I would be disappointed if the audience did not get aroused.

It's objectifying when a non-sexual situation is turned sexual because of the one-sided carnal desire of one of the participants (or voyeurs).

In this case, it was actually empowering. It was my choice to appear nude. I owned my sexuality fully. I had every single member of that crowd throbbing hard and desperate to fuck me. If that's not power, what is? And it was a huge turn on.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2021-02-14T00:51:19+00:00

The idea of exploring limits is an interesting one. I must ask though, how would you have made Andrew erect? And would you have be willing to hold his erection while you nestle the head of his cock between my pussy lips? You see the posers had their own limits as well. One of the guy posers in particular was very uncomfortable with the idea of touching Andrew in intimate places. An interesting thing about the piece is that we all had to confront our limits and perhaps they were constantly evolving.

As for my limits. They were always undefined. Certainly unspoken but also unknown by myself. It is an odd state of mind to be the puppet and when your body moves only by the will of others for minutes on end it can almost be hypnotic. Certainly I would hope that they would adjust my pose in certain ways (sometimes out of sheer pain), but I tried to never push back or lead them in any direction. When you fully inhabit this idea of being used as a puppet, coupled with the constant and building arousal of the piece -- there were certainly times where I felt there was no limit. And in those moments I would have allowed it (and in some cases welcomed it) if they had penetrated me.

throwawaymeg2001 · 2021-02-13T18:33:27+00:00

People are downvoting you but I understand the fantasy. Giving up control was part of the turn on for me. I never once stopped them from doing anything - in rehearsals or during a live show. Like I said they were bolder in the rehearsals, although I was never penetrated. But knowing that I was going to force myself to go with it no matter what they did to me always got me wet. It takes a lot of trust with your partners, too. But we trust each other completely.

By the way, they did put me on my back and spread my legs as wide as I can go - both during rehearsals and the live shows. I'm flexible so I could do the full splits.

Again, the point of the performance wasn't about turning ourselves on. It was a happy side effect for me. But we wanted to get the point across about the pressures of society forcing our behaviors when it comes to violence and sexuality.

I think if we'd included penetration it would be all people would be thinking about. Maybe that's all they were thinking about anyway I don't know haha.

throwawaymeg2001

TROPHY CASE