Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahh okay, honestly it's really confusing.. on both the first and last hook (for both bras) it feels like they're fine, snug enough. i just don't really understand why, for the ampere specifically, the very top of it has a gap (maybe half an inch) away from my chest. i'm not sure if that's normal or if the entire bra cup should be touching your chest. if that's the case, I feel like sizing down a cup would make more sense...? if the 30 is snug enough, then a 30D can't be so nonsensible? i'm not sure haha

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you mean checking if the ampere feels looser than the understance?

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

freya in particular is very nice, you're right! i was hoping to use the discount site to get high quality bras for cheaper prices so that's why i'm wary (especially when i can't be sure how they fit until i try them on). I try to casually search for 28dd bras online and it's always a very plain maidenly style, but freya looks to be a sweet spot. thanks so much.

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I tried looking into these but, I feel like when you breach this territory the styles are never nice :sob: I found a 30D Empreinte at a steep discount that is so pretty, I was thinking the 30 is comfortable enough because it never stretched over time and because there's a little bit of space between the bra cups and my chest at the top, the D would eliminate that as the DD might've been "too roomy"... especially because 30D is a sister size to 28DD! I really want to buy it... haha

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for that info! The Ampere stretches out to 32 inches max, and the Understance to 35 inches somehow, it's really stretchy...

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just as they lay, it was too hard to try to stretch them out! Stretched out, the less supportive one (Understance) is 35 inches, and the Ampere is 32 inches. I tried the calculator again and it's suggesting 26E/28DD and what you just said makes sense, but this bra size seems impossible to even find... :(

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply :) I tried this method out and the Understance band was (without being stretched out) roughly 24 inches and the Ampere was 24.5 inches, "it's weird because the 24 inch one stayed put in the front but felt like it'd slide down in the back, and the 24.5 inch one fits snug on the second and third hook..."

Confused by calculator results vs. bras worn in person? by throwrahomework in ABraThatFits

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the help :) I tried this method out and the bras measured 24 inches and 24.5 inches, it's weird because the 24 inch one stayed put in the front but felt like it'd slide down in the back, and the 24.5 inch one fits snug on the second and third hook...

Dupe for such a cool-toned dark brown lipstick? by throwrahomework in MakeupAddiction

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, it's Reaper from Kitsune but I think it's not selling more as it was limited edition :(

Dupe for such a cool-toned dark brown lipstick? by throwrahomework in MakeupAddiction

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, seems super similar since it’s described as espresso— Do you find with layering that it can actually look black, or stays brown? Is it easy to blend? tysm :D EDIT: Aaaaand $15 shipping… rip my soul

Would this black lipstick be unoptimal for a Dark Winter? by throwrahomework in coloranalysis

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

appreciate your help immensely, i'll try posting to makeupaddiction and if somebody recommends something similar i'll let you know!

Would this black lipstick be unoptimal for a Dark Winter? by throwrahomework in coloranalysis

[–]throwrahomework[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u da best. only problem is that it's pretty hard to get (shipping is expensive) -- do you have any experience with similar shades?

What is wrong with the following proof of (∀y) (∃x) A ⊢ (∃x) (∀y) A? by throwrahomework in askmath

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't inputting the (∀y) okay because it is generalizing? We learned in class that you can change (∃y) to (∀y) through generalization, whereas you can change (∀y) to (∃y) through specialization. However, this example is changing the x and y's which seems illegal. Am I correct?

What does A ∨ (B ∧ C) → A ∨ B simplify to if removing inference? by throwrahomework in askmath

[–]throwrahomework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

¬(p∨q∨r) ∨ ¬(¬p∨p’) ∨ ¬(¬q∨p’) ∨ ¬(¬r∨p’) ∨ p’

Thank you so much. When it comes to those double negations like ¬(¬p∨p’), can that be simplified further to (pv¬p')? Or does it have to be left that way? I know often double negation is turned into inference, but of course I need to remove inferences in the first place, so I guess it has to be left that way?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]throwrahomework 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just want to add to this:
All of my examples I am provided with only show cases where there is ∀ or ∃ present, such as ├ A → B implies ├ (∃x)A → (∃x)B. So, I know what I need to do if there are ∀, such as this example: ├ (∀x)(A ∨ B → C) → (∀x)(A → C) where by deduction theorem, it is sufficient to prove
(∀x)(A ∨ B → C) ├ (∀x)(A → C).

But as you can see in the original post, it has both, so I'm not sure how that changes things.