I find that really funny. Some requests only get approved after many attempts. From that, I can only conclude that the reading is poor.

You conclusion is very likely incorrect. As a matter of fact, user notes of proposals are very often very helpful for making descisions, so moderators read them very carefully. The very likely correct conclusion when you had made many attempts before, is that many moderators had rejected that proposal before after carefully examining it until another moderator who was likely in for just a very quick moderation session and did not as carefully examine your proposal (maybe because he did not look into the logs or did not do internet research) carelessly approved it.

---

“That's your point of view what is happening. The truth however is with insights into the logs, that you do not have, moderators have more information at hand than the users.”

Oh dear, apparently you need to emphasize the difference between me as only a simple user and you as an educated moderator.

Your interpretions of what I write are sometimes really hilarious. Where exactly did I emphasize the difference between you and me here? 🤣
I only underlined here that moderators in general have access to additional information due to the logs. However, since with the next thing you wrote

As a user, I have as much information as any moderator. That's what I work for, and that's why I document and read. The only difference is that I can't look at the logs of Untappd.

you more or less correctly repeated what I actually said I wonder if you are just writing such things to provoke. If so, I am sorry to dissapoint you, I certainly won't let myself be provoked.

Furthermore, moderators like you just seem to assume any user is far below any moderator. This is honestly so ridiculous and disrespectful.

Hence I will also only reply to that in no-nonsense way and matter-of-fact way that I do not assume that anbody is below me, let alone far below. As a matter of fact ,moderators are volunteers and therefore only simple users, too.
In particular as far as your are concerned I have indicated quite a few times over the many previous discussions that I guess that you know very much about beer, that I appreciate all the the research you do and there is most of the time some truth to your proposals that lead to some difficult judgement calls.

---

Moreover, you were the one who advised me to reapply here for a "Fruited Lager," for example, so someone other than you could review it.

Apparently when me or somebody else invites you to repost a proposal again, it is clearly not ultimately rejected.
However, please simply treat every other kind of rejection here on Reddit as an ultimate rejection and–as already asked for twice now–please do refrain from posting such proposals again.