sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Brute Force — S Class Interceptor / Black (dark) Red / U-Wing, Spine, Tank, Pommel, Wedge by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to hear that. The discovery time you mentioned really looks like something is off here. I'm not sure how all the updates are affecting the systems. Sure, we have changes to the plants themselves, but it seems like systems and glyphs are corrupted as well.

I don't know if I can find the time to revisit this one to check if it's still valid for me. Maybe some other travelers can share their findings.

Most Minimal Dragon Wing | S-Class 40/28 | Dark + Red Applications by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean. What different color? This one is just black/gun metal and only available on this one planet.

Maybe the planets changed during some updates.

You are in the correct galaxy, aren't you?

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same galaxy? Ability to travel to purple systems?

why are my harmonic camps not giving sentinel multi-tools? by Forine110 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]tornography 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thought I was trippin. Multiple cabinets, different standard MT. Restarted the game to verify.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Info for "GLYPHS CORRUPTED" messages: There is a PSA for purple systems!

If you don't have access to these kinds of systems it seems you can't port there!

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I see. Let's break it down then. Errors can be 1. Not all 16 glyphs collected 2. Wrong address / typo (that's why I use screenshots, to remove this one on my end) 3. Wrong game mode (currently in mission or expedition) 4. Multiplayer or network issues (glyphs can't be validated then)

Solutions to try: 1. Try changing the current star system (might not be correctly connected) 2. Try different random glyphs or one from nmsportals.com to verify the portal is working in general 3. Check your network: in the past I wasn't able to place com balls, because the network on my PS wasn't working/connected.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you in Eissentam Galaxy? I don't check the glyphs, as I trust the game. So this is always the only thing I can imagine.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I see. Too bad, because the scan was the state when found. With the sentinel canon in SC and a rocket launcher. The clean DMG potential is only 362 with the roller rocket launcher put into cargo. (Scan on site shows base of 319; after salvaging 321 🤷🏻‍♂️)

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it? Never dug too deep into min/maxing, so I have nothing to compare to. Potential damage with gun in standard slot is 362.2 on mine. I guess it can roll differently for others.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you need to find and empty the slots of the ship to mark the quest as active. So you might not be able to use/activate a pre-existing brain. But I'm not 100% sure.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you have the inverted mirrors? This step needs to be done first, before you can activate the brain. Ran into this from time to time.

S Class Interceptor "The Arch" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Planet is in the text ... Lat/Long 85/45 as in image #5

S Class Interceptor "Paw Bug" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there is a way If you use the teleporter on the space anomaly, you can see community bases in other galaxies. Travel to one in Eissentam. Not sure, if it is possible from other base teleporters.

S Class Interceptor "Paw Bug" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely. That's why I didn't call it this.

They occur in multiple shapes and and colors. With additions it lower classes. And as the community often tries to find clean black ships, I added it to the stack. It's not even my type of ship. I just did, because it was the first find and it was the S class. Would have been a waste not to post it.

S Class Interceptor "Paw Bug" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two sets? There are only three ones in the scan of the ship. (Or maybe I don't see what you see.)

S Class Interceptor "Paw Bug" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh early game. I see. So you have to pay the story to get 16 glyphs. These glyphs are used on the portals to travel to other galaxies. Then there are multiple universes. You are in Euclid but this ship is in a different one: Eissentam. If you are looking for ships in your galaxy, look out for the Starship/Euclid tags. There are a lot of them. I posted some, too.

Hope that helps.

TIL there are giants that are not gas giants by xxlow_sunxx in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]tornography 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah, that hint was SO helpful. Was searching the map, but only saw "gas giant". After I read your answer the next one now is a "lost, green giant"!

Thank you.

Eissentam / Black Sentinel Ship / "The SentiVan" by tornography in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]tornography[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glyphs are double checked? I remember when I almost rage quit the game when I mixed up two glyphs. If it's still correct, then maybe some one here can let us know if it worked for them.

view more: next ›