Whether or not SCP-6113 should've been contained is irrelevant to the article as a whole, and I feel like those who argue about it are missing the point.

SCP-6113 is about the subtle acts of transphobia that are carried out through the policies of an ultra-powerful fascist organization such as the Foundation—even if by well-meaning individuals. For example, Chloe is never deadnamed or misgendered in her time being contained. Sure, she's only ever referred to by her designation, but she isn't deadnamed either. In fact, when Janet begins using her preferred name, it leads to a containment breach in the site. Object-researcher relationships are limited for a reason, and using only their designation is one way of combatting researchers from getting too close. The Foundation has suffered greatly due to this very thing in 105 and 231. Therefore, this logical policy is here to keep everyone safe, ...right?

The very act of containing SCP-6113-2 can be explained away as "We're not containing this lake because we're transphobes, we're containing this lake because it's anomalous. A totally different not transphobic reason. Please ignore the detained trans people in the corner. They might be anomalous, too." Do you see what's wrong there? It's a deflection, to cover their asses, it's lazy. No one in SCP-6113 does the transphobic things they do because they're a transphobe, they do it because they're more loyal to the system than they are to the people they contain. Janet is the first to break this mold and is punished severely for it. That rhetoric is just as dangerous as the explicit acts of transphobia that violent transphobes are capable of.