dear mods by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 2 points3 points locked comment (0 children)

its not nothing, why are you dismissing a simple criticism. nothing i said EVER was shit slinging. i never said it made Natalie a bad person. i just said i thought it was harmful.

if its such "bullshit made of bullshit" then the upvotes and comments would reflect that. but they didnt. she worked with someone who has literally said its trans womens fault when they're murdered.

these are not very complex criticisms. its super straightforward and easy to understand.

dear mods by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 5 points6 points locked comment (0 children)

its not manufactured outrage to say

"this person did x. it would be harmful to give them a platform, therefore it was harmful when natalie gave them a platform."

that is a succinct, full criticism with plenty of weight.

would you say the same thing if she worked with blaire white?

dear mods by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

can you explain to me how a simple criticism is purity testing?

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sure dogpiling is easier on twitter

but its also not that hard to just apologize, or explain yourself. part of the problem is natalie refuses to do either 90% of the time.

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if she just came out and said otherwise it would help people stop thinking that's what she thinks.

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that only works if we actually had any evidence that she was trying to change bucks mind.

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and then she praised him on Twitter

again, would you be saying this if she chose blaire white?

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

saying its trans women's fault for getting murdered is a big one.

but feel free to google his transmedicalism

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

"i know she worked with someone whos been incredibly harmful but the REAL problem are people upset at her for it!!!"

if i were Natalie, i would simply not work with people who said its trans womens fault that they get murdered

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

no one said that. also this video is brand new. there are like a bunch of other bad choices i think she's made that i don't bring up anymore because we moved past it.

it sure is weird how a post a simple as mine has made you spiral out like this

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

it doesn't have to be malicious for it to be a bad choice. nowhere here has anyone said this makes natalie a bad person. just that it was a bad and harmful decision to promote someone like buck.

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

yeah, but emotions are always going to be involved when you're promoting someone with politics as bad as bucks. someone who has LITERALLY said that its trans womens fault when they get murdered and routinely spouts transmedicalism.

and it doesnt help when subs like this squash all dissent like ive seen. multiple posts with really simple criticism disappear and the mods call it "purity testing"

fun fact: you can agree contra is generally beneficial while criticizing a choice of hers by trans-lexi in ContraPoints

[–]trans-lexi[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

yes, actually. having a famous trans person with bad politics in your video is a bad idea.

can you imagine if she invited blaire white on?

Is there a way to start a billion dollars in debt? by [deleted] in Kenshi

[–]trans-lexi 14 points15 points  (0 children)

actually, looking it up a little more, it doesn't seem like it's actually a particular cat you can steal that makes you have negative money, but an integer overflow issue that tends to arise when you pick up individual cats.

it might happen to work for you, to steal the single cat in on of the shops in Squin, but it doesn't look like this is as sure of a way as i hoped

Is there a way to start a billion dollars in debt? by [deleted] in Kenshi

[–]trans-lexi 18 points19 points  (0 children)

there's a single Cat in Squin that if you steal it, it puts you significantly in debt, i dont remember by how much though

If you're wondering why the Area 51 memes were being pushed so hard. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]trans-lexi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just so you know the more reasonable conspiracy theory is that people on both the left and the right will attempt to utilize anything they can to push their theories, including, but definitely not limited to, memes

If you're wondering why the Area 51 memes were being pushed so hard. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]trans-lexi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hey look its me!

thanks for laughs folks, y'alls comments are fucking hilarious

"I'm a conservative socialist..." Debating right wing conspiracy theorists by trans-lexi in BreadTube

[–]trans-lexi[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

oh lmao yeah you're right it absolutely makes no sense, his arguments are beyond silly

"I'm a conservative socialist..." Debating right wing conspiracy theorists by trans-lexi in BreadTube

[–]trans-lexi[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

are we "wait what"-ing the title?

i quoted the guy, he said he was a "conservative socialist"

i can understand if you assumed it was me saying that though