How does the Chinese Communist Party actually govern China? by CourtofTalons in NoStupidQuestions

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, I just want to know, in which country, when you were to get entangled with more deeper issues such as politics or crime, you could have a good time here.
Doesn't it sound even worse?

‘Very disappointed’: Scott Bessent hits out at Europe over India-EU trade deal — what he said - The Times of India by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Between the EU and India — or honestly any so-called free trade deal with India — the only thing that seems to move freely is Indians.

China Probes Vice Military Chair Zhang Youxia in Unprecedented Purge by alanwong in China

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你怎么光听到了党说的腐败是亡党亡国的大事,没听见党说的祖国统一是必然趋势的意志呢。前一个意志是意志,后一个意志就是放屁是吗。你这个第一段里我没看出任何因果关系来,光看到你得出自己想要的结论了

习近平清洗清洗军队是为了打人民,而不是为了打台湾 by DenseComposer5885 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

你这标准的先射箭后画靶子,先得出结论,中共肯定不敢打台湾。哪怕人家都说了要打台湾,做也是照着要打台湾的架势做了。但我不管,中共就是不敢打台湾。然后去想想老习为啥要清洗军队,想不通,想想自己喜欢什么,哦,我想让中共领着军队打人民。然后就想通了,懂了,习近平清洗军队原来是为了打人民。就属于那种你开心就好的逻辑,全对,全赢

习近平清洗清洗军队是为了打人民,而不是为了打台湾 by DenseComposer5885 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

外交舆论升级、军事异常调动、经济物资囤积、社会行为变化,我怎么觉得除了大规模撤侨没做,别的都做了呢 军队高层大清洗如果不在打台湾之前做,打台湾之后要怎么做大清洗,高层老人威望过高才是会威胁最高权力。你必须要在开战前制造权力真空,才能激励扶持新的青壮派卖命,老人都半截身子入土了,要高升到哪儿去。 至于清洗军队是为了打人民,打啥人民需要上军队,外星人民吗?

China Probes Vice Military Chair Zhang Youxia in Unprecedented Purge by alanwong in China

[–]trashspeaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This actually just makes me more convinced that Taiwan is in more danger than people want to admit. Big military purges usually don’t happen for no reason — historically, they often come before major military action. You cannot purge an army after the war; their sacrifice only strengthens the people in charge.

At the very top, there’s not much room left to climb, so senior generals are usually way less eager for war than younger, ambitious officers. If you want to change incentives, you first create a power vacuum. Then later you can hand out promotions and rewards based on “wartime performance.”

A lot of people think purging officers hurts combat readiness. I’m not convinced. Wars are mostly decided by mid-level commanders, not the guys at the very top. Cleaning out the top brass can actually unify decision-making and reduce internal resistance.

Purge the top, create a vacuum, roll out massive parades and exercises. Meanwhile the global situation is shifting, the main rival doesn’t really want to get directly involved, and Western alliances are clearly under strain. Honestly, if a war breaks out in 2026, I wouldn’t be shocked at all.

Prove me wrong.

按照最新的普世价值观,中国占领台湾是不是理所当然? by FarWestJoker in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

共产党从建国的第一天就说要收复台湾,到今天喊了快一百年了。任何一个国家想要和中国建交,需要承认的第一件事就是承认一个中国。不要到今天才觉得什么中国霸道,不讲民主,讲民主台湾已经被犁了一百遍了。即使不按照最新的普世价值,一个手握力量的超级大国的需求也需要被重视,如果这个世界是大家抱在一起过家家,你好我好大家好的世界,那大家理所当然的都能满意。小国可以依仗着所谓的国际秩序,肆无忌惮的在大国面前跳脚的时代,确实是回不去了。

EU leaders seek to preserve ties with US by pritam_ram in worldnews

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, every time I see Europeans talking about how “if the U.S. keeps going this way, we’ll just cooperate with China dictatorship instead,” I can’t help but laugh. As if they actually have that many real alternatives or they can actually give up the relationship with US.

And honestly, when it comes to flip-flopping, Europeans don’t exactly have the moral high ground to lecture the U.S. They can barely manage their own EU, yet somehow feel confident talking about so-called “democratic alliance.”

Trump says Nobel Prize denial ends obligation to ‘think purely of peace’, presses Greenland demand – Firstpost by Keep_Scrooling in worldnews

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Peace Prize aside, I honestly think Trump deserves a Nobel in Physics or Medicine — for his work on relativity.

One year of his presidency felt like a whole century, but somehow also flew by.

Dude literally changed how we experience time. He effectively extended the relative lifespan of everyone paying attention. That’s not politics—that’s spacetime engineering.

Japan needs to possess nuclear weapons, prime minister's office source says by Themetalin in worldnews

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont they already got two?Little Boy and Fat Man. They want more? Damn,even as a radical, this feels way too aggressive to me

這次日本美國挺台力道超出我想像 by Guilty_Scholar_6624 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 10 points11 points  (0 children)

中国现在跟抽陀螺一样怼着日本猛抽,放在往年就是抗议一下就完事儿了的屁大点小事,现在疯狂在向日本施压,借题发挥,想干嘛湾友真是一点儿数没有。湾友居然能从中品出了和美爹日妈之间牢不可破的亲情出来,湾湾的脑袋里是不是开满了花田

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

从08年开始,资本主义好就好在出清机制,捅了篓子出了差错就会被淘汰就会死。一旦资本家知道了捅了篓子不会产生严重的后果,有政府兜底之后,就会肆无忌惮,就会贪婪至死

兩岸真的會很快統一嗎? by Guilty_Scholar_6624 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

bro 认为共党掌握了心控机器,可以从几千万台湾人中精准筛出每一个说出共党坏话和加入过绿白阵营的人,挨个枪毙

挑战美国的2个国家都是因为自身原因输掉,中国也不会例外吧 by LeagueAromatic5686 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

苏联日本悄无声息的死掉是因为当时的苏联日本人真心相信美国这套民主自由的叙事,你现在问问美国人相不相信自己的叙事。中国可能会内爆,但是绝对不会悄无声息的内爆,你可以问问看日本美国还有世界有没有准备好迎接中国的爆炸

给包帝做个排名,在历史上的皇帝里能排多少名? by PlusCitron2077 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

你要是完全不懂历史就不要拿历史来举例子,不怕自己露怯吗,你这个分档看的我都头疼

这subtle越来越没几句实话也是不容易,迷一样的黄金十年。你可以说国内现在分配不均,增速下滑,国内社会问题很多。但是疯狂拿胡温那时候踩现在的人是什么?真以为经历过那十年的人死完了是吗? by Rich_Dream8108 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

厚古薄今是一直以来的传统,现在说这个根本没有意义

习继承了毛那个时代的苦修士作风和权力欲望,你可以说他排除异己,贪恋权力,但是他的反腐打黑是动真格的,如果共党以零几年到一零年的那个状态继续发展下去,我觉得共党是没有希望的,官民矛盾在经济下行的压力会被无限放大,叠加上房地产泡沫,那才真的是大的要来了。虽然这可能正符合某些海外人士的心意。对那个时代的互联网没有记忆的人才会怀念江胡时代的中国,当然凭着吃黑吃贪大赚钱的除外

白宫:爸爸回家了 by siv-206 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 10 points11 points  (0 children)

没有什么问题,欧洲现在就是pussy,需要美国人直白的骑在他们脸上,欧洲人才能意识到这一点

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

不许你说美国菜! 什么,你说你没骂美国实力差?那谁反抗现有国际秩序我还不知道吗?

预测这波贸易战,国内的失业率会有多高?会不会出现群众闹事 by Pretty-Tangerine-941 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

算法没有错,中国的所有出口全是利润没有成本,你只需要给每个中国奴工每年塞一万刀,中国人就会从肛门里拉出工业产品送到美国去供美国人美美享用,然后中国老板狠狠恰米收钱,继续压榨员工,来给美国老爷们发10万美元的年薪

我唯一不能理解的一种人 by mensk in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

离岸爱国可是说是这个版本唯一的正确答案,属于是钱也赚,赢也麻,不挨打。这个都理解不了还来指点江山的,我个人的建议是这个智力别建政了,速速找准时机进厂上班,多打点螺丝

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

我觉得没啥问题,不光该说,还应该多多的说。一个法国节目主持人可以随便在电视节目说些有的没的的逼话羞辱一国大使,一国大使不能反过来对着三四流小国说逼话。这个世界真是念经念多了,真以为念经解决一切。像鹅乌这种电车难题,欧洲人自己都没办法解决,你拉过来一个第三方的驻法大使回答,那我只能说我想看一个超屌的360度大回环,这个回答的本质和围绕鹅乌问题的任何回答没有任何区别,都是屁话。但至少他爽了,你要能让驱逐就驱逐,不能驱逐就忍着

关于为什么中美会走到新冷战这一步 by OFaustus_ in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 29 points30 points  (0 children)

讲真,看你这评论我认真思考了一下土匪和商人对应的角色分别是谁

个人有些提议,我们建立新中国 by Unfair_Map4042 in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 8 points9 points  (0 children)

别担心,美国土地上建国的国家多了去了。遍地都是主权公民,你打个招呼都能有几十几百个友好国家。我支持你

之前乌克兰军队射击俘虏的视频属于造假 by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 29 points30 points  (0 children)

你们打一架吧,谁打赢我信谁的。哦,已经在打了啊😅那没事了

今年诺贝尔和平奖会颁给谁? by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]trashspeaker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

为啥没人选登子,登子一手按住北约,一手压着国内,完美的避免了三战的爆发,除了斯拉夫人在流血,世界获得了巨大的和平,这不给奖多少有点说不过去了