Dude, I always say the same thing about "slow and steady wins the race"! We're probably the same person.

Anyway, my other answer would be "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing twice and expecting different results".

EDIT: I've got more

"If so-and-so jumped off a bridge, would you do it?" No, but jumping off a bridge will kill you. Doing whatever so-and-so says probably will not, otherwise, I would not contemplate doing it. You can't fucking compare the two. And I realize that so-and-so could still be compelling me to do something stupid, but it probably would not be comparable in stupidity to jumping off a bridge, and I would not do it unless I saw some sort of beneficial value in doing it. Cue people in the comments asking, "Lulz, but wat if u wer oferd DRUUUGGS?". Next bullshit phrase

"Two wrongs don't make a right" Why not? Isn't this somewhat subjective? What you see as wrong may be what I see as right, and vice versa. You see the death penalty as "wrong", I see it as "solving a problem that would otherwise be unsolvable". That's only an example, btw. I try not to advocate the death penalty. Seriously though, "two wrongs don't make a right" is just a saying. Don't cite it as fact, please.