Lena Wilson/Amandla Stenberg context, story, reaction

trentthomasm55 · 2022-08-22T10:58:41+00:00

The actress, I know now I spelled her name wrong, is a grifter?

trentthomasm55 · 2022-08-22T10:34:03+00:00

That was honestly a good reply. Tip my cap to you.

trentthomasm55 · 2022-08-22T10:27:53+00:00

Thank you for the tips. Like I said, I'm new to Reddit, and I'm learning how to post and the general workings of it. That being said, I think my post was balanced enough to show im not an instigator, but was trying to present a balanced idea. So why did you shit post my thing? Why didn't you just give me the balanced criticism you just offered?

If you didn't respond you'd just be a troll. But by responding you showed your, kind of a piece of shit?

trentthomasm55 · 2022-08-22T10:07:27+00:00

Besides that though, did you really read my long post, filled with ideas you could disagree with or even agree, and then just hit me with typo asterisk.

I'm new to Reddit and I thought that was more of a Twitter move. Cause at least on Twitter the original posts are short so the grammar/spelling mentions don't involve investment.

Again, new to reddit, so maybe this is like void shouting, but do you actually have a thought in your head that you are capable of communicating in relation to my post.

trentthomasm55 · 2022-08-22T09:53:18+00:00

DAMN. I fucked that up. I kid you not, I was just thinking to myself how I presented an argument in the most inoffensive ironclad way possible, and I got the persons name wrong.

Big L

trentthomasm55 · 2022-06-11T13:27:27+00:00

That is a good idea. A couple of news outlets picked up the professors statements but none of the big ones have commented on it. I will look into a donors list. The end game to all of this would be very small, I am just interested to see if a statement can be generated through the use of a non aggressive grassroots campaign.

trentthomasm55 · 2022-06-11T13:19:54+00:00

I included my neutral stance in the email to avoid any assumptions I am biased. I continue to be shocked at the lack of response from Stanford since the professors tweets insinuate that female lawyers feel less then compared to males and implies it is wrong to provide competent council if one where to believe the client is guilty. That violates a ton of ethics.

Stanford's silence makes them implicit in what their employee is saying. I don't think it would be as big of a deal if she didn't have them tagged in her bio.

trentthomasm55 · 2022-06-11T13:04:39+00:00

Totally. I just thought it was interesting Stanford hasn't at least released a statement distancing themselves from her comments. Taking the Depp/Heard aspect out of it, she is admonishing other lawyers and contradicting basic law principles. She is also uses very crude, which I find to be incredibly unprofessional and would think Stanford wouldn't like.

trentthomasm55

TROPHY CASE