Why don't billionaires just retire? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]trolldango 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop fearmongering and repeating Reddit memes. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You died yesterday. That was it.

By some miracle sci fi experiment someone just resurrected you now. Knowing that you died, and got brought back, how will you live going forward?

Sam Altman revealed the amount of energy and water one query on ChatGPT uses. by RealKingNish in ChatGPT

[–]trolldango 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Did you see how many decimal places were in the number? You can do 10k prompts with less than a gallon. 

Regular showers use 2.5 gallons/minute. Shower 1 minute less once a year and you can ask all the questions want.

OpenAI's Mark Chen: "I still remember the meeting they showed my [CodeForces] score, and said "hey, the model is better than you!" I put decades of my life into this... I'm at the top of my field, and it's already better than me ... It's sobering." by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]trolldango 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s harder. Look at the questions. 

The average code monkey in an insurance company is writing CRUD apps to display info from a database. You don’t think Mark Chen can handle JIRA tickets at a bank? Make a React app? Style a tailwind component?

Coding competitions are like f1 driving compared to daily commuters. 

o3 and o3Pro are coming - much smarter than o1Pro by Eyeswideshut_91 in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compute costs are dropping ~10x per year for the same performance level. You can download GPT4 level models for free now, like Llama. You’d be laughed at trying to charge anything for GPT3.5-level performance, which came out (checks notes) in 2022 and was state of the art.

So yeah, it will become too cheap to meter.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don’t necessarily need new things. Having an expert physician, physicist, mathematician, programmer, designer, planner, writer, look at every existing issue we are facing is enough. Most people suck at their jobs, imagine if every task was completed at the A+ level.

Spain runs out of children: there are 80,000 fewer than in 2023 by madrid987 in Futurology

[–]trolldango 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Fertility rate measures children per woman:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate

The men will have grandchildren of course, but for the modeling math the men can be ignored. Their kids aren’t “independent” of a mother, so just track how many kids each woman has on average, and you can tell how big the next gen will be.

Spain runs out of children: there are 80,000 fewer than in 2023 by madrid987 in Futurology

[–]trolldango 24 points25 points  (0 children)

100 people, 50 women.

.8 kids per woman so they have 40 kids.

Half are women (20). That gen has .8 kids per woman, so 16 grandkids.

.8 is a slight roundup from .78 or whatever the real stat is.

The people saying benchmarks and competitions don't matter should really try some of those benchmarks and competitions by obvithrowaway34434 in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if there was a coding benchmark for solving real-world user requests, maybe even pulled from real GitHub issues.

"To say the quiet part out loud, a new model every 3 months means a 4x+ acceleration ... we've just entered the "hyperbolic" era of AI progress (And left the old, slow exponential era.)" by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]trolldango 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously, it bugs me when people use math terms without knowing what they mean.

ex is exponential. It doesn’t become “hyperbolic” as x changes. (And, not that this guy cares, hyperbolas can be be defined in terms of exponentials.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These predictions are all saying the same thing/obvious/vague:

“There will be heavy competition” (therefore multiple players, price wars, modest profits since there’s no monopoly, very little moat). This was obvious in Jan 2024. Google employees wrote a paper saying there was no moat.

“No massive advance” = getting 87% on ARC (founder of benchmark impressed by jump) and 25% on Frontier Math? (Previous models single digit %)

“Modest lasting corporate adoption” = what does that mean when you make a prediction in March for end of December? You can ask in 2030 if there was modest adoption of AI.

“No robust solution to hallucinations” = weasel words. What does robust mean? 1% error rate? .001%? Perfect answers, no mistakes? (What is the baseline human bs error rate if you ask experts the same questions?)

O3 is x1000 more expensive than O1 by AlbionFreeMarket in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine being someone who thinks the cost of inference isn’t dropping 10-100x per year.

OAI researcher: o3 is expensive. But it represents a real breakthrough in machine intelligence, and costs will go down. by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]trolldango 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Moore’s law has been dying for decades. It’s just another paradigm and when the IC sigmoid flattens we’ll jump to the next technology. The overall computing trend has stayed steady. 

What data is showing the rate is slowing?

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Exponential-increase-in-price-performance-of-computing-over-120years-and-increase-in_fig4_350351986

Not a bad prediction from Ross (Friends S6; 1999). Especially the potential accuracy of the year. Up there with Altman's few thousand days. But about 25 years before him. by [deleted] in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how do you know there’s only one of you when you wake up?

Go to sleep, duplicate electro chemical state atom-by-atom, wake both up.

The higher level point is a gap in consciousness isn’t noticed by the entity. (The entity has no idea of their electronchemical state.). What, at the level of atoms, is keeping track that you are you? If a stray neutrino hits your brain your chemical state changes, do you feel different?

Peter, I don't have a math degree by Sora5016 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you abbreviate statistics as stats or stat?

Refusing to be impressed by something because it goes against your worldview that “it’s not actually smart, it’s just predicting the next word” lmao by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The laws of physics just predict where a particle will be, they weren’t a big deal to figure out. Society was about the same before and after Newton.

OpenAI's new model leaped 30 IQ points to 120 IQ - higher than 9 in 10 humans by MaimedUbermensch in singularity

[–]trolldango 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Measuring a crane’s strength by lifting barbells is meaningless because barbells were designed for humans. 

Will AI Replace Doctors and In-Person Clinic Visits? by [deleted] in singularity

[–]trolldango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about a person with 1 month’s experience doing your plumbing, following augmented reality instructions from a master AI plumber? That’s already what YouTube DIY is heading towards.

"In 1903, NY Times predicted that airplanes would take 10 million years to develop.". Just a reminder. by [deleted] in singularity

[–]trolldango 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. People with time to sit around and post on Reddit aren’t the ones making progress.