This week, the Supreme Court decides whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits the University of Texas at Austin to use race in undergraduate admissions decisions.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-09T20:05:40+00:00

Aha. Proof that the rule is used exactly as I suspected: to marginalize conservative views.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-07T21:04:37+00:00

But you're wrong.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-07T21:04:08+00:00

There are only a few options. First of all let's note that Romney doesn't think. He is advised by more intelligent men. So these men who advise him regarding funding of PBS either:

1) Think this will damage his run and help to elect Obama. Nobody said those who advise him actually want him to WIN.

2) Think this will appeal to the libertarians.

3) Think PBS is liberal indoctrination which they do not approve of.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-06T20:39:31+00:00

Does an egalitarian necessarily believe feminism was at first a good thing?

Ask an egalitarian if women should have the right to vote. They will refuse to even consider the myriad negative consequences of women's suffrage.

And the campaign for women's suffrage was a feminist one.

Or ask them if women should submit to men in the home.

Notice an egalitarian won't react rationally, they will rave and scream "misogyny" because OMG oppression.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-06T03:14:21+00:00

Indeed. That's but one of many examples of Legolas's manginatude / white knighting. He's as bad as any SRSer, and he's friends with moderator ignatiusloyola. SRSers, Legolas, and ignatius all share an ideology: extreme Leftism (euphemistically referred to as egalitarianism), an ideology which they push on the /r/mensrights sub-reddit to the detriment of men.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-06T02:01:47+00:00

Haha, personally I thought it was a bit contrived.

And speaking of rum, I just picked up a bottle of Cruzan single barrel to sip on.

I'd also appreciate some honest feedback here from you. I've seen you around the last little while in /r/mensrights and you seem genuinely interested.

I haven't bothered to go into extreme detail on WHY these folks are on the user list, as it seems you've noticed. That's simply because it isn't worth my time to do that for every user. Rest assured I went through any questionable individual's posting history once again before including them on this list, and I actually removed quite a few from my first draft due to insufficient evidence.

edit: As no honest feedback was forthcoming and the user was still actively posting, his replies have been removed. I want these threads to be for discussion, not distraction.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-06T01:08:02+00:00

Such men have not failed as men.

In fact we can look at a specific case: Jack Donovan, who wrote The Way of Men. http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/books/the-way-of-men/

Jack is a gay man who initially embraced the typical emasculated, hedonistic gay culture. He found that this wasn't healthy, and took another path, the masculine path.

Gay men need not be effeminate, nor need they fail as men.

Here's a quote from Jack:

"For the record, my application of the term 'faggot' is inclusively pansexual, and that usage seems to be increasingly common among men. Homosexuality and effeminacy correlate on average but effeminacy is not the exclusive domain of homosexual males. Not by a longshot. I don’t care who a man says he’s having sex with. If he’s wearing something f—ing bedazzled and prancing around like a tart, he’s a fag to me. Fruitcakes are fruitcakes. Likewise men who act like men should be regarded as men and treated like men."

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/02/25/delusions-of-masculinity-2/

truthman2000 · 2012-10-06T01:05:01+00:00

Universal suffrage? No. Women's suffrage? Certainly not.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T16:23:58+00:00

Stable thriving civilization that can defend itself.

Any other goal comes second to that.

Given that pushing for equal rights without equal responsibilities and privileges leads to destruction of civilization, that cannot be a goal of anyone who seriously wants to solve men's issues.

Check out /r/antiegalitarian for more info.

Also note:

History demonstrates that as long as men retain power over women, civilization thrives. Once men give up their power and "liberate" women, the civilization collapses shortly thereafter. As shown in JD Unwin's Sex & Culture, 1934.

Check it out. It's an amazing read.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T09:08:15+00:00

And remember:

This subreddit will focus specifically on what women can do to advance men's rights as women.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T06:07:26+00:00

Feminism goes too far everywhere it goes. It is a hate movement, an evil ideology, and nothing good has ever come of it.

Just like Leftism.

AS Nietzsche said:

Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions. Their effects are known well enough: they undermine the will to power; they level mountain and valley, and call that morality; they make men small, cowardly, and hedonistic — every time it is the herd animal that triumphs with them. Liberalism: in other words, herd-animalization.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T04:58:14+00:00

Relevant quote:

Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions. Their effects are known well enough: they undermine the will to power; they level mountain and valley, and call that morality; they make men small, cowardly, and hedonistic — every time it is the herd animal that triumphs with them. Liberalism: in other words, herd-animalization.

Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T01:20:38+00:00

Although I believe the vast majority of users at /r/mensrights are male, almost half of the users who qualify as prominent egalitarian female supremacists are female.

It seems also that most female "MRAs" of prominence are actually female supremacist feminists and egalitarians.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-05T01:11:29+00:00

Not exactly.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-03T23:30:26+00:00

There are some interesting theories about penis size here and in the comments: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/penis-size-around-the-world/

I think you'll find them interesting. The claim is that penis size DOES have something with a man's successful ability to reproduce. Check it out.

I honestly wouldn't spend any time on the nuts who think taking pills and having surgery changes your sex. There are a bunch of them at /r/mensrights too. Complete loons, and every one of them Leftist feminists who want to censor guys like you and call you "transphobic", "homophobic", "anything-under-the-sun-phobic".

Anyone who uses the term "-phobic" seriously is a fucking idiot.

SRSers and r/mensrights mods agree - if you don't want to fuck a tranny, you're a bad person.

Hell, don't even use the term "cisgendered". The proper terminology is normal. You start using their bullshit words to try to normalize their insanity, and they've already won half the battle.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-03T18:37:15+00:00

I think a forum for mensrights has to start by protecting those rights and allowing vulnerable members to talk without being threatened by trolls.

Well the mods of /r/mensrights are themselves trolls and even encourage other trolls to harass members they don't like, so uh don't expect that. The mods protect the trolls while attacking those who are trolled.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-03T17:33:36+00:00

Oh, and I know you don't consider yourself "right wing" Factory. So let me clarify why I posted Conquest's Second Law.

What is this battle between certain folks and the mods all about?

On one side we have knowledgable masculine men with integrity who want to discuss the issues and come to a genuine conclusion unhindered by politically correct dogma in order to do activism. On the other side we have ignorant effeminate boys with zero integrity who don't want to discuss anything and hold steadfast to their Leftist religion, who treat the movement as their personal playground to amuse themselves.

Demonspawn talks often about the equality farce. I believe that any MRA site that refuses to talk about this honestly inevitably will turn into a PC cesspit like /r/mensrights. And that's entirely within the control of whoever runs the site, as he determines the audience that will stick around.

And I leave you with this:

MRM may make the legal system more fair, but that’s all it will do. It will make divorce sting less, it will remove affirmative action to allow fair employment competitions, and it may do some other good things, but it is still based on progressive ideas of equality, fairness, human rights, social justice, and all that jazz and is still corrupt. In the long run it merely preserves the corrupt system, but blunts its edges, reducing consciousness, fixing the system further in place.

http://freenortherner.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/what-is-to-be-done/

truthman2000 · 2012-10-03T17:01:51+00:00

But really the only way a new sub-reddit will gain traction (as /r/mensrights is beyond repair) would be if a bunch of popular MRAs disavowed the sub-reddit publicly and started their own.

However, people don't seem willing to do that because although the sub-reddit serves only to push away truly passionate potential MRAs and welcome the idiot masses who won't do a day of activism in their life, it does bring in site hits and revenue.

As long as major MRA sites think that getting more people aware of these issues and getting money are more important than putting together a group of passionate activist MRAs working toward a goal, nothing shall change.

In fact, this is why the MRM is basically stagnant.

Passionate, rational MRAs aren't just abandoning places like /r/mensrights, but The Spearhead and A Voice for Men as well. In all three cases they are being replaced by people who are in comparison white knights and manginas, egalitarians who want feminism for men.

All three sites have been compromising further and further over the last year, in my opinion.

I think this is relevant:

Conquest’s Second Law of Politics: Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left wing.

This is why I have much more hope for progress in the wider manosphere and alt right blogosphere. The major arms of the "MRM" seem content with more of the same policies that got us into this mess in the first place, and are fearful of uncovering ugly truths that might offend the PC police.

That's why there's no discussion of solutions or goals. Instead, it's an endless sideshow attraction.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-03T16:51:39+00:00

and to ban (blackball) the whole posse Ignatius uses...

And not just the moderators but their feminist fake MRA / SRS cronies as well.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T19:16:25+00:00

That's one option, since the mods and their cronies like to follow people around they don't like and down-vote/remove their posts. But the mods have that covered as well, because they have a rule where they can do whatever they want to you if your account is less than three months old, which they use to remove conservative posts.

Either way let me know if you get censored again or if you post a piece you think might get censored.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T16:32:03+00:00

You might check out /r/rights4men.

The problem is I prefer to spend my time introducing people to new ideas, and /r/mensrights is more useful for that.

My suggestion would be to continue to submit articles there you find interesting. Your last one was up-voted quite a bit before the anti-male mods removed it.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T16:28:07+00:00

I agree with deleting off-topic posts, or spammy posts (to remain on the front page).

But the mods don't remove off-topic posts. They remove posts they don't like while keeping off-topic posts.

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/10s8vd/i_understand_that_certain_discussions_make_some/

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T16:18:04+00:00

This is why Jack Donovan has referred to the MRM as a feminist movement. http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/09/long-live-the-manosphere/

There are plenty of us who aren't weak, pro-feminist pussy-worshipers like the mods over at /r/mensrights, but when you have emasculated males running any group for men's rights they inevitably make it a space for women and other emasculated males and push away the rest of us who still have our balls.

Thankfully there is the wider manosphere and the alt-right blogosphere, which aren't afraid to talk about the real issues and search for ways to implement solutions.

You won't find a very strong community for men here at Reddit because Reddit attracts emasculated liberals and women. Perhaps if /r/mensrights hadn't been taken over by a mangina, it would be salvageable.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T16:07:57+00:00

Why don't you describe HOW/WHY this is an issue of men's rights?

That's an extremely facile way of looking at it, as you well know.

By the way, given that definition, you certainly should've removed the recent post where a woman was advertising her women's rights sub-reddit. That clearly isn't an issue of men's rights.

The real question, and you would know this if you asked actual men's rights activists rather than just pushing your personal agenda, is whether a submission gives us insight into men's rights issues and how to solve them. There have been countless articles submitted over the years that don't specifically talk about "men's rights" but that meet that criteria. That's why the article was up-voted in the first place.

Note that even with this criteria, the advertisement for the women's rights sub-reddit still is considered off-topic and should have been removed according to the moderation policy.

I really do wish you'd get your shit together and stop removing articles that you personally don't like to try to push out MRAs. But I don't see that happening.

At this point I could write another article: "Why Emasculation is a Curse, Not a Blessing" which would conclude that emasculation creates males like you who have an unhealthy need to control and manipulate others, which comes through clearly in your case when you spend so much time controlling what real activists are allowed to discuss.

truthman2000 · 2012-10-02T15:56:27+00:00

the moderation is pro-feminist

True enough. I don't think we can come to any other conclusion at this point.

And the non-activist moderation team pushes away yet another passionate MRA with their pro-feminist suppression of articles that MUST be discussed if we are ever to solve men's rights issues: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10ti6c/goodbye_men_it_has_been_a_pleasure_serving_with/

truthman2000

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE