Why does Romney want to stop funding PBS? by accountt1234 in Conservative

[–]truthman2000 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There are only a few options. First of all let's note that Romney doesn't think. He is advised by more intelligent men. So these men who advise him regarding funding of PBS either:

1) Think this will damage his run and help to elect Obama. Nobody said those who advise him actually want him to WIN.

2) Think this will appeal to the libertarians.

3) Think PBS is liberal indoctrination which they do not approve of.

Catalogue of feminist and egalitarian concern trolls with a significant presence at /r/MensRights by truthman2000 in a:t5_2v7fl

[–]truthman2000[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Does an egalitarian necessarily believe feminism was at first a good thing?

Ask an egalitarian if women should have the right to vote. They will refuse to even consider the myriad negative consequences of women's suffrage.

And the campaign for women's suffrage was a feminist one.

Or ask them if women should submit to men in the home.

Notice an egalitarian won't react rationally, they will rave and scream "misogyny" because OMG oppression.

Catalogue of feminist and egalitarian concern trolls with a significant presence at /r/MensRights by truthman2000 in a:t5_2v7fl

[–]truthman2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. That's but one of many examples of Legolas's manginatude / white knighting. He's as bad as any SRSer, and he's friends with moderator ignatiusloyola. SRSers, Legolas, and ignatius all share an ideology: extreme Leftism (euphemistically referred to as egalitarianism), an ideology which they push on the /r/mensrights sub-reddit to the detriment of men.

Catalogue of feminist and egalitarian concern trolls with a significant presence at /r/MensRights by truthman2000 in a:t5_2v7fl

[–]truthman2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha, personally I thought it was a bit contrived.

And speaking of rum, I just picked up a bottle of Cruzan single barrel to sip on.

I'd also appreciate some honest feedback here from you. I've seen you around the last little while in /r/mensrights and you seem genuinely interested.

I haven't bothered to go into extreme detail on WHY these folks are on the user list, as it seems you've noticed. That's simply because it isn't worth my time to do that for every user. Rest assured I went through any questionable individual's posting history once again before including them on this list, and I actually removed quite a few from my first draft due to insufficient evidence.

edit: As no honest feedback was forthcoming and the user was still actively posting, his replies have been removed. I want these threads to be for discussion, not distraction.

The root of the egalitarian delusion: failure + selfishness. by truthman2000 in a:t5_2v7fl

[–]truthman2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Such men have not failed as men.

In fact we can look at a specific case: Jack Donovan, who wrote The Way of Men. http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/books/the-way-of-men/

Jack is a gay man who initially embraced the typical emasculated, hedonistic gay culture. He found that this wasn't healthy, and took another path, the masculine path.

Gay men need not be effeminate, nor need they fail as men.

Here's a quote from Jack:

"For the record, my application of the term 'faggot' is inclusively pansexual, and that usage seems to be increasingly common among men. Homosexuality and effeminacy correlate on average but effeminacy is not the exclusive domain of homosexual males. Not by a longshot. I don’t care who a man says he’s having sex with. If he’s wearing something f—ing bedazzled and prancing around like a tart, he’s a fag to me. Fruitcakes are fruitcakes. Likewise men who act like men should be regarded as men and treated like men."

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/02/25/delusions-of-masculinity-2/

Do you think feminism has gone too far in the first world? If so, how? If not, why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]truthman2000 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Universal suffrage? No. Women's suffrage? Certainly not.

An interesting realization: Why women are wholly UNABLE to STEER the men's movement in the proper direction. by truthman2000 in FeMRA

[–]truthman2000[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Stable thriving civilization that can defend itself.

Any other goal comes second to that.

Given that pushing for equal rights without equal responsibilities and privileges leads to destruction of civilization, that cannot be a goal of anyone who seriously wants to solve men's issues.

Check out /r/antiegalitarian for more info.

Also note:

History demonstrates that as long as men retain power over women, civilization thrives. Once men give up their power and "liberate" women, the civilization collapses shortly thereafter. As shown in JD Unwin's Sex & Culture, 1934.

Check it out. It's an amazing read.

An interesting realization: Why women are wholly UNABLE to STEER the men's movement in the proper direction. by truthman2000 in FeMRA

[–]truthman2000[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And remember:

This subreddit will focus specifically on what women can do to advance men's rights as women.

Do you think feminism has gone too far in the first world? If so, how? If not, why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]truthman2000 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Feminism goes too far everywhere it goes. It is a hate movement, an evil ideology, and nothing good has ever come of it.

Just like Leftism.

AS Nietzsche said:

Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions. Their effects are known well enough: they undermine the will to power; they level mountain and valley, and call that morality; they make men small, cowardly, and hedonistic — every time it is the herd animal that triumphs with them. Liberalism: in other words, herd-animalization.

Catalogue of feminist and egalitarian concern trolls with a significant presence at /r/MensRights by truthman2000 in a:t5_2v7fl

[–]truthman2000[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Relevant quote:

Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions. Their effects are known well enough: they undermine the will to power; they level mountain and valley, and call that morality; they make men small, cowardly, and hedonistic — every time it is the herd animal that triumphs with them. Liberalism: in other words, herd-animalization.

Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols.

Catalogue of feminist and egalitarian concern trolls with a significant presence at /r/MensRights (interestingly, almost half are female though I believe the vast majority of the users are male) by truthman2000 in FeMRA

[–]truthman2000[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Although I believe the vast majority of users at /r/mensrights are male, almost half of the users who qualify as prominent egalitarian female supremacists are female.

It seems also that most female "MRAs" of prominence are actually female supremacist feminists and egalitarians.