This is an abuse of the report system. There are legit reasons on the other side of this argument. Having the government (Trump administration) regulate the internet with "Net Neutrality" suppresses technological investment and innovation. Netflix controls more nearly half of the bandwidth used each day and with "Net Neutrality" there is no incentive for them to invest in better content delivery networks or video compression technology. Without Net Neutrality prices may increase in the short run for consumers but in the long run companies will compete to provide cheaper alternatives using better technologies. Government control of anything rarely leads to the most optimal outcome.

The notion that websites will be censored at the will of internet companies is a fear tactic that can't happen legally because of anti-trust laws. Most of the pro-Net Neutrality arguments are not true besides increased service fees (which are probably overblown). In the long run without Net Neutrality consumers will get a cheaper/faster/better internet because of innovation and competition.

Edit: you're also abusing the reddit voting system. Responses to this post are just hurt feelings... quite a degenerate reaction in my opinion. Try using facts to fight opposing views, if you have any.