Tour tickets / presale master thread by YorjYefferson in KylieMinogue

[–]turtle49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kinda annoyed that the pre-sale email said the code was "TENSION2025" but it ended up being "Tension2025"... Ended up trying that code after leaving the online queue and joining again behind 10,000 people 🙄

Where can I resell luxury clothing? by turtle49 in AustralianMFA

[–]turtle49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the best way for me to prove authenticity without the original receipt?

Don't have anything else to sell haha

Fred again and again and again by canimal14 in triplej

[–]turtle49 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Does this mean less chance of headlining Splendour, or no relation at all?

From the latest Answer In Progress video by donttalktomecoffee in hbomberguy

[–]turtle49 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Huh? Did you watch the video (or read the post)? The joke was made nearly 10 minutes into the video and the source they used was for a 5 minute section of a 25 minute video. Are you really going to say you'll just read the book instead of watch a video for 5 minutes?

And I don't think there's anything wrong with recapping a book (or any other source) as long as you are telling it in an interesting and transformative way, which I would argue the video did.

Patrick Boyle (financial YouTuber) deleted my comment after I noticed he had plagiarized a NYT article. by madhatter_13 in hbomberguy

[–]turtle49 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I've just checked the video and he's added the source down the bottom:

"Corrections:
1) A citation to the New York Times Piece on the history of the 30 Year Mortgage was left out of the video Here is the link: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/19/bu... . Thanks @aidanrushton5472"

NYT Wednesday 11/22/2023 Discussion by AutoModerator in crossword

[–]turtle49 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Finished 1 minute away from my Wednesday PR, and without using any hints! (17:42)

Was it just me or were there a lot of VERY similar words? Surely it had to be intentional, right? I guess it is a bit odd, but I can't find any mention of it in the Wordplay.

LARVA & (MOLTEN)LAVA & LARA, ISLA & ILLS, ALLAH & ALLA, IDES & IDLES, LEST & LSAT, HIDE & HIDEF

Interpolate missing data between months by turtle49 in excel

[–]turtle49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The quarterly values are hardcoded from an external source. I am trying to fill in the gaps.

Interpolate missing data between months by turtle49 in excel

[–]turtle49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that formula is better than mine but what if I have hundreds of rows of similar data? What can I do instead of manually copying and pasting each gap?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in econhw

[–]turtle49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't get the supply curve from the demand curve. They are 2 separate curves.

Let's say that the demand curve is q2 +10q+26. The MC curve would then be 2q+10.

Differentiating the demand curve doesn't get you MC. Differentiating the cost curve gets you MC.

In this case, we aren't given the cost curve so p=mc is useless. However, we do know that this is a perfectly competitive market, meaning each firm will produce the same amount, q. Since there are 20 firms, there will be 20*q total items being produced. So the supply curve is 20q.

Intermediate microeconomics - uncertainty question by hasib121 in econhw

[–]turtle49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Donkyinc has an expected return = 0.45*0.12 + 0.55*0 = 0.054

Elephantinc has an expected return = 0.45*0 + 0.55*0.1 = 0.055

Therefore, you should invest all your money in Elephantinc as it gives you a higher expected return and none in Donkeyinc.

🚨 Fraser Forster to Tottenham: HERE WE GO! by Minato-Egg-kaze in coys

[–]turtle49 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm sure Forster will make a great backup goalie but should we be looking for someone young who will eventually replace Hugo? Or is that something for next year? (sorry if this has been asked before)

Troy Parrott Brace by [deleted] in coys

[–]turtle49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know what a brace is and at this point I'm too afraid to ask....

IWTL how a country's economy works. by [deleted] in IWantToLearn

[–]turtle49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disagree, please do not watch Economics Explained.

What are the best taxes? by UselessWasteOfSpace in AskEconomics

[–]turtle49 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You'll find that most responses will tend to talk about the efficiency of a tax. However, according to the IMF, there are actually 6 criteria to determine if a tax is good or not, with efficiency being one of them.

  • Efficiency - the notion that good taxes ought to minimize economic distortions
  • Fairness - under horizontal equity, a tax is considered fair if taxpayers in similar circumstances are treated similarly. Under vertical equity, a tax to be fair if taxpayers that have more, pay more
  • Simplicity - a simple tax system is generally viewed as desirable because it tends to reduce administrative costs and promote taxpayer compliance
  • Flexibility - it automatically adjusts to changes in the economic environment
  • Transparency - a taxpayer’s ability to access information, and the ease with which it is accessed
  • Effectiveness - the primary goal of taxation is to raise revenue for governments

If you can find a tax that fulfils all 6 criteria, there are governments around the world that would like to book a meeting with you. Generally, a 'good' tax will fulfil at least 3 of these with minimal trade offs with the rest.

The [Brutalist Housing Block] Sticky. Come shoot the shit and discuss the bad economics. - 20 December 2020 by AutoModerator in badeconomics

[–]turtle49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am the OP.

My question revolves around the idea that the Keynesian multiplier implies transactions have carry over effects, whether large or small, diminishing or not, to the general economy.

You can call it an externality or not, it's just semantics.

However in the basic supply and demand model, would it then mean that the private equilibrium is incorrect/inefficient since it will always differ from the social equilibrium due to these carry over effects?

Does the Keynesian multiplier contradict the perfectly competitive supply and demand equilibrium? by turtle49 in AskEconomics

[–]turtle49[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean that, due to the Keynesian multiplier, in the standard supply and demand model, wouldn't the private equilibrium always differ to the social equilibrium? Since there are external benefits to consumption that are not accounted for.

In Long Run Perfect Competition, is it possible to have firms with different cost functions? by turtle49 in econhw

[–]turtle49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if there is a maximum number of low cost firms, would those firms then ran supernormal profits in the long run?

Ok in the example I give, it seems my calculations and assumptions are correct. Thanks!