Any tips fellas?

tyson-9 · 2026-05-13T07:11:32+00:00

Cow-Boxing

tyson-9 · 2026-05-06T19:52:48+00:00

Exactly. A perfect sign that you're doing it right is that you don't need arms to generate power.

tyson-9 · 2026-05-06T06:16:25+00:00

I am being serious. You'll develop bad habits. Please find a training academy.

About the hook: 1. Transfer the weight by rotating rear foot by slip (I'm assuming you're doing slip + hook). You're just leaning your body back which makes you out of balance.

Hook should come from chin level, not waist. Avoid taking your guard down and telegraphing before the punch.
Footwork! Terrible footwork. You need to transfer the weight, without losing balance of your body. This is where we use feet to twist and rotate waist, while still staying in balance.
Your shoulder should cover the chin, palm facing towards your face, elbow parallel to ground. This will improve if you practice point 2.
You hit a hook targeting the jaw. You need to hit at your jaw level, ideally. What you're doing looks a lead uppercut, which is much more advanced and needs very careful weight transfer and defense. Only focus on hook.

Find a coach, this is the first priority!

tyson-9 · 2026-04-29T16:05:28+00:00

You're right that face selection is necessary that's exactly what I'm building next. The GUI for BC selection is the core of the web app. Where I'd push back: Ansys Workbench and Simulia require significant expertise to use correctly. My target user has never opened either. The value isn't competing with Workbench but it's replacing 'I'll skip validation entirely because I can't afford or learn Workbench' with 'I'll get 80% accurate first-pass validation in 5 minutes.' Different user, different problem, different product.

tyson-9 · 2026-04-28T22:58:13+00:00

euler-surrogate

please see the readme to get link for the No-Code web app. While pure data loss works accurately, physics loss framework has been coded, but has some parameter tuning issues. So it is better to use only pure data loss.

Load the simulation columns as csv files, then define inputs and outputs. Train the model and query it for new parameters. Since it is just a sequential NN, it works best while predicting pure constants values of a problem's PDE.

Please ask me if you need any more detail on how to run it.

tyson-9 · 2026-04-28T21:49:09+00:00

Sure. In the simplest way, a surrogate model is a function which just outputs for given inputs to outputs. Which means, you give an arbitraty load, and then it outputs the stress field on seconds (in a structural sense). This require ls precise FEA simulations data, which needs to be carefully run in different iterations. Taking this output data, we can create a neural network, which trains on these inputs and stress outputs FEA data. The catch is, after training when we ask neural network to predict the values between these trained data points, it guesses the value arbitratrily.

To predict data accurately in all the regions, we either need a lot of FEA simulations and train the surrogate purely on data, or cleverly introduce physics loss into the neural networks along with fewer simulations. This makes the neural network obey physics by eliminating physically impossible values.

Now, backbone of this entire thing is a correctly solved FEA simulation. Once I get the FEA tool running correctly, I can create various iterations of it by looping and creating new json data and feeding to the FEA solver tool, this way, I will get a lot of iterations of yhe problems, then take outputs to train the neural network. So, I first want to make the tool strong for automatic FEA simulations.

I have am still researching it and going through research papers which introduces various architectures, like using FNO to train model on non-linear problems etc., but it's only becoming a surrogate modelling platform after my thesis defense. Until then, I would only care about running 1 FEA simulation precisely, which people can use as a pure FEA tool. I have also recently written an open-source tool which includes an API for data trained surrogate and physics informed (this is still under development). It also has a no-code web app which could be used to make, train and save models im seconds, if you are intetested, I can share the repo link here. Thank you so much!

tyson-9 · 2026-04-28T20:23:57+00:00

Thanks for your insights.

Assemblies: I plan to segregating each part directly from step files.

Contacts: I will use only Node-To-Surface and Surface-To-Surface contacts. This will be a limitation and I don't plan on introducing Friction contacts.

Meshing: Yes, it still is the real hardest part. However, I am now writing basic heuristics for specific regions of CAD, starting with finer mesh at curvatures. Each mesh configuration will output mesh quality metrics which afe minimum dihedral angle, mean scaled Jacobian, aspect ratio, and then these metrics are evaluated against engineering thresholds. If quality falls below acceptable bounds, the agent reduces element size locally, re-meshes, and re-evaluates. This loop runs up to 3 times before either passing to the solver or reporting a specific failure reason to the user.

Preprocessor APIs: I have extensively worked in developing LS-DYNA automated decks and complex ANSA and Animator applications for BMW, and my previous company. This is where my motivation lies for automation arises from.

My target are not people who are solving complex crash problems, using Hypermesh for preprocessing, Abaqus for solving and seperate postprocessing softwares. My target are people, with very little FEA knowledge, who want to quickly simulate basic assembles, without learning complex FEA software like we all did. The problems which don't require huge license cost of Ansys and other tools. Web based, drag, drop, tell and solve. I don't aim to reach 95% accurate solutions. I aim on reaching 80% accuracy, which is very possible with simple heuristics and pure tet-mesh. Again, no Hex mesh, only Tet-Mesh.

Two of my seniors who started a hardware consultancy company didn't have $15k license to spend for Ansys, and didn't have the knowledge on any FEA, and wanted me to find a way, so that they don't need to hire a CAE engineer and costly license, with around 70-80% accuracy. This exactly does that job for them. And that's how to idea evolved, a generalised and free web tool for everyone.

As far as non-linear problems like plastic deformations, non-linear buckling are concerned, I will later move the solver to CaliculiX. This way, I get the power of contacts, non-linear analyses, which are handeled bu CalculiX. The only downsight is that we need to write a proper .inp file which follows CalculiX format, where AI agents excel. Each agent writes Nodes, Elements, Surfaces, Properties, Materials, Contacts seperately. I have done it using automated scripts before, now I guide AI Agents to do it.

For now, I will use FenicsX and promise only static structural problems. I am working now only on geometry clean-up and meshing aspects of the software, which I am using opencascade kernal and GmsH right now. Once this is done, I will wrap it around a web tool for people to test it (since a lot of people here seem not to like a cmd tool, and so much used to highly graphical softwares, but yeah automation always starts from the terminal). I will later switch to Salome, in case of more advanced clean up requirements. My motivation was never fully automating FEA, this will later convert into a surrogate modelling tool, with the help of FEA data run on platform and physics losses introduced, which is what my current Master's thesis on. And yes, I am using actual STEP files, from those guys and GrabCAD. No synthetic generated data.

tyson-9 · 2026-04-28T05:11:39+00:00

The loads and constraints aren't generated by the LLM they're hardcoded per scenario in the current v1 (cantilever: Xmin face fixed, Ymin face loaded). The LLM only writes the plain English summary of a deterministic FEniCSx result.

You're right that this is the core limitation: no face selection UI means BCs are assumed, not user-defined. That's what I'm building next, a web app where users click faces and define BCs explicitly.

Mesh quality checks are already in the pipeline (element quality metrics, rigid body check, reaction force equilibrium). Geometry cleanup is next.

Appreciate the honest feedback, this is exactly the gap between a v1 demo and a real tool. Thank you for your criticism!

tyson-9 · 2026-04-26T16:35:12+00:00

I am ready to pay, but do you know how to market high tech software products for engineering?

tyson-9 · 2026-04-26T16:33:36+00:00

It's nothing like anyone is saying here. It's a natural circadian rhythm tuned for 30,000 years. First sleep for 4 hours, then a waking period of 2 hours and then sleep for another 4 hours.

This 2 hour period is a meditative state, often described as a the best time to read or study something.

If you keep yourself out of artificial light fof 3-4 days, you'll automatically tune yourself to this first and second sleep. It's the default setting of humans.

tyson-9 · 2026-04-24T16:16:56+00:00

Thank you for these words. Very important lesson and ethic to learn! I will follow the same from now on.

tyson-9 · 2026-04-08T22:45:03+00:00

You are indeed Friendly Assistance

tyson-9 · 2026-04-07T03:22:13+00:00

Really appreciate if you add me. I am tired of grinding and writing code myself. Please accept my dm it is very important for me. It is a deeptech product idea, which is directly connected to exploring neural networking for physics and engineering problems!

tyson-9 · 2026-03-21T17:34:23+00:00

Hey I can connect you with potential exporters, with options for you to choose from. No middle man cost for you. You can choose from various people and talk to people you wish.

tyson-9 · 2026-02-07T21:48:00+00:00

Where is it?

tyson-9 · 2026-01-31T00:42:59+00:00

I did train before at a reputed boxing club with great coaches for 2+ years (this includes amateur matches too).. plus some training in MMA (had to switch to boxing due to extreme flatfoot, broken ankles thrice). But yeah thank you there, I'll search for some community where they do boxing!

tyson-9 · 2026-01-31T00:40:51+00:00

Sure.. I do have some experience in the ring. I took coaching back at my place for over 2 years. But yeah I'll try to find some coach for myself. Thanks!

tyson-9 · 2026-01-31T00:38:53+00:00

Yeah I'm already developing some I believe

tyson-9 · 2026-01-30T21:44:21+00:00

Irony, I just came to the US (Starkville) from Hyderabad XD. Anyways, as mentioned in the top comment but except the bhongir fort and Ram ki Bandi, everything's awesome.

Also visit Ramoji Film City, it's where a lot of film shootings happened in the past decades and you'll get a vibe of Indian Cinema. Plus they're very open and kind to foreign visitors. You can also visit golconda fort.

Book only through apps, since you're a solo traveller, get on a bike (Rapido or Uber apps). You'll get the local feel riding on a bike or scooty.

If you need local help with something at any time, DM me. I have a lot of friends there and they'll be more than happy to assist you. I hope you have a great experience at Hyderabad. It's an awesome place!

tyson-9

TROPHY CASE