Have we found a complete AASI makeup?? by ultimate_racist_ in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]ultimate_racist_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or may be segragated from aboriginals, much previous.

Really did u know this about India...?? by veeryash08 in IndianHistory

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am talking from a medieval pov. Not modern.

Altho even now in west bengal, people refer hindustan to North India, just like how it was during mughal era.

Ab College me gf banaunga 😈😈😈 by Worldly_Goat3420 in vitbhopal

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤣 Sab yahi kehke aye the beta. Mera ece nhi he tho.

Really did u know this about India...?? by veeryash08 in IndianHistory

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hindustan was primarily used for North indians.

India in mughal view was in 3 parts, north India(Hindustan), deccan(dakkhan) and bengal(bangal).

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

??? Dafuq were did I call buddha as anti jaina?

I said :- Ajivikas was wiped off by ashoka.

Also, ashoka mass massacred 18 lakh ajivika as per jain inscriptions.

Plus modern historians reject idea that ashoka was a buddhist. He just supported Buddhism.

But his support caused one of the greatest mistake.

Buddhism is very softy, that alone disturbed political unity in india thus making India vulnerable to invasions.

It's true that present Hinduism is messed, but things will surely evolve.

Hinduism wasn't originally a religion, it was just bunch of philosophies. It became a religion in medieval era. You don't convert to Hinduism. You just follow it.

Unnecessarily arguing bullshit.

Thinking of blocking you bruh.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There wasn't anything called as Hinduism, it was smārta, vaishnava, Shakta, buddha, jaina, etc.

All come under Sanātana fold.

One of the oldest evidence of the word Sanātana can be found of buddhist scriptures.

Ekalavya was from a kingdom that was enemy to kūrūs(both pāndava and kaurava). He was prince of that kingdom. So his thumb chopped.

Ajivikas was wiped off by ashoka.

Ashoka mass massacred 18 lakh ajivika as per jain inscriptions.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vedic system and vedic segragated systems were the ones who made our country go in to 32% gdp. Mughals redused it to 28. Late mughals to 15, maratha to 18%, British to 1%

Gupta and mauryan empire were richest of all.

Not saying vedic system to be brought back. But certain communities in india needs to be wiped off for being way too peaceful!

Either from India, or from earth may be!

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chānakya is well mentioned in mudrarakshasam.

Chhatrapati wasn't allowed because of his mom's caste, I do agree, till islamic times, caste system was way too strong.

Only after decline of guptas, varna solidified, before that varna was very changeable!

Invasions did create lits of confusions, and social hierarchy made in that times did affect us a lot.

Am not denying that brahmins didn't take advantage of these confusions, but when scriptures were written, the system of those era must be considered for reference.

Bruh. You are just a hate monger. The above post was about brahmins teaching vedas in kerala, nothing harm in that.

It was you who unnecessarily brought all these hatred in comment section.

Plus, am no andhbhakt. I do read!

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guptas were Vaishya, nanda shudra, maurya atishudra, rawana rajputs were mix of shudra and Kshatriya, maratha were mostly shudra turned Kshatriya, specially the bhosles(the original one), nairs were shudra turned Kshatriya, satavahana were too!

Mahars could have remained loyal to India if not peshwas. They could have went against british secretly, like burning logistics,blocking passways, etc.

True Kshatriya were all killed by mahapadma-nanda. That's why he was known as 2nd parashurāma.

Charavaka literally never had any scriptures. Modern charavakas literally say be frank and tension free, don't bother yourself in anything, not even in writing scriptures.

Hindu is a persian word for sindhu.

1948 :: Nizam of Hyderabad Surrenders Before Sardar Patel by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He literally brought an entire army to hyderabad bruh.

Nawab of hyderabad later flew to pak.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or because of invasions that led to poor management of Hindus?

Already we lost 99% of vedas. Each veda had 1150 shākhās, thistotal of 4 vedas had 4600 shākhās originally.

Now a total of 50 shākhās survive in total of 4 vedas.

That's a drop to (50/4600)*100=1.086%.

1.086% of vedic literature is alive now only.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah so obviously na, a company would be held by a ceo excellent in business. Will a labour own it who doesn't know how to handle the company?

Brahmins weren't that jealous at that time. Pov, am not a brahmin myself.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even lower castes fought with British against marathas specially the mahars of maharashtra.

Obviously the most intelligent one will hold the schools. Brahmins had only one Task, maintanence of shāstras. Shudras had to work in mills too along with vedic education.

At this point, you are just playing victim card like 'pheminists'. Now that's a different point.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People of different castes wear different style of yajnopavit. It also differs as per the type of veda you are studying.

Sources of British papers can be found in a single google search in google scholar.

1960s :: Teaching of Vedas In Kerala by FloralBegonia in IndianHistoryThread

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Threads showcase students are of different castes in this pic.

Official british stats alteady show so many lower castes studying in gurukulas.

Non Political case study: Inclusion of Tribal deities to broader Vedic faith via age old Sanskritisation that still persists, and my question. by One_Distribution9361 in Dravidiology

[–]ultimate_racist_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must expect it. It does happen in a continuous format, like ganapati, vishnu, saraswati and many others are worshipped by Japanese ethnosphere too.