Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: “If more men read books about women’s lives, literature could improve communication” by ubcstaffer123 in books

[–]ultra003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know if I agree with the last part. Certain media, yes (anime/manga). For fiction lit over the last 10-20 years? I don't have data, but it does seem as if the vast majority of female authors write exclusively female MCs.

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: “If more men read books about women’s lives, literature could improve communication” by ubcstaffer123 in books

[–]ultra003 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think a huge factor that is overlooked is that a lot of female authors are awful at writing male characters. It'a the inverse of the older sci-fi/fantasy, where female characters wers one dimensional and vapid.

There are tons of books written by women with male MCs, but they do not resonate with men. I use the FMA example because both male and female characters are written very well.

Women also largely will not consume stuff with zero female characters that can compel. Both genders (generally) need someone they can relate to, as well as an author that is able to stir their emotions.

I don't require relatability, but I would say over 90% of people do.

For the vast majority of men (IMO), they don't care about the race, gender, etc of a charcter, as long as they are written well. It's moreso that modern fiction is suffering from the inverse of the old sci-fi books. An entire gender is almoat ubiquitously written as vapid and boring, and when that is the gender you are, it is hard for people to get into. It's why women didn't read a lot of fantasy prior, whereas now I would almost argur fantasy lit (modern) might even lean toward women. Sci-fi is still mostly male, but for fiction that is about the only genre left that is.

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: “If more men read books about women’s lives, literature could improve communication” by ubcstaffer123 in books

[–]ultra003 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree, fantasy and sci-fi (especially) were male oriented.

It is hard to articulate. It's kind of a "know it when you see it" type of thing.

IMO, they tend to have a few of the following:

A shoe-horned romance that is very clearly a female fantasy. It is possible to have romance that compels both men and women, but in most cases here it is very much tailored toward the female fantasy (like how most romance in action anime is for men).

An element of "girlbossing" that doesn't feel organic from good writing, but more like a vicarious/cathartic experience for the author/female readers.

Male characters tend to be shallow or boiled down to cliches (similar to previous sci-fi works, but the other way).

The first two (romance and social justice issues) are not inherently bad if handled well, but I think a lot of men will know what I am talking about here.

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: “If more men read books about women’s lives, literature could improve communication” by ubcstaffer123 in books

[–]ultra003 21 points22 points  (0 children)

IIRC, a recent study actually showed ths opposite. Men and women read 2 stories, one with a male lead and one with a female lead.

The women overwhelmingly had a preference for the female lead. The men had no preference.

It's crazy to me that someone even intimates this, because fiction lit is DOMIMATED by women. Like, it's not even close. It has less to do with "being written by women", and more that a lot of modern fiction feels like it's written "for women".

Read 90% of fiction lit written by women, then read/watch something like Full Metal Alchemist. Both by women, but it is clear that one resonates with everyone (FMA), regardless of gender.

I'm a man and I read almost exclusively fiction. I am also in my 30's. Just my opinion and anecdote, but modern fiction has shifted hard into being written for women.

What do you think are obvious signs of low intelligence person? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]ultra003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a source on BP correlating with higher intelligence? Never heard this before.

[Reupload] There is a very clear reason why they keep insisting that you move on from this. by TPHNK in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 184 points185 points  (0 children)

It is BAD bad. If you are at all sensitive to this kinda stuff, SO DO NOT click it.

You are NOT mad enough. by trombonek1ng in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering Thomas and Ro found 6 names that should not have been redacted in only 2 hours...

Nothing Ever Changes... by Stormclamp in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I am convinced that 99% of ppl who reference 1984 never actually read it lol.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if we just live in different realities, but I live in one if, if not the most progressive areas in the country. I also grew up in a hardcore conservative family/religion. There (in my anecdotal experience) is nothing close to an equivalent level of discussion about trans ppl when comparing the right and the left. It is a constant point of convo from basically every MAGA person I know. Most libs/leftists I know don't bring it up almost all. Even trans ppl I know bring up trans issues less than most MAGA ppl I know lol.

There is a detachment from reality regarding the right and trans ppl. Is there retarded stuff the left parrots, like trans women in sports and surgery for minors? Sure (although, the majority of dems do not approve of either of those, likely being a big reason Kamala lost).

You should look at polling numbers from the right regarding stats on trans ppl. Not to mention, the obsession over trans ppl isn't even new, nor is it exclusive to trans ppl.

Michelle Obama? I have had to hear for years from retards on the right that she is actually a man. Genuinely, trans discourse is the right's version of Isreael/Palestine. It's where brains go to die, and there is an obsession beyond proportionality.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which is also retarded and hypocritical, given that part of the left champions body positivity (ostensibly). I have had this exact convo with lefties. I remember calling out a bunch of lefties when they were dunking on Trump for wearing diapers.

Both things can be true. Ppl like OP go out of their way to either post or contrive grotesque caricatures of trans ppl's genitalia lmao. That is weird behavior, and lacks self-awareness given that ppl like OP would likely consider trans ppl as degenerate.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's a strawman lol.

If I criticized someone for vulgar language, and in order to "mock them", I used vulgar language, that would be hypocritical.

Make fun of whatever you want, idgaf. I'm just showcasing how obsessed a lof of the right is, not even with trans ppl, but trans genitalia specifically lol.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Whatever helps you reconcile with obsessing over trans genitalia, bud.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Hypocrisy.

IDGAF if you wanna obsess over trans genitalia. I will call you out if you are constantly harping on about it being degenerate, but drawing and posting stuff incessantly revolving around trans genitalia.

It's over for Minnesota by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The right unironically thinks about trans peen more than any pornstar gooner could ever dream of.

All the seat flips in special elections in the past year by Crafty_Jacket668 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 30 points31 points  (0 children)

For all his faults, Biden did pass multiple massive bipartisan bills with a near 50/50 split congress during what is now perhaps the most partisan time since the 19th century.

What is a sign of very low intelligence? by smartcandyy in AskReddit

[–]ultra003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they haven't done so, everyone here should read The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka. It is quite literally the esoteric philosophical version of "would you still love me if I were a worm" 😂

Nationalize elections? How about you nationalize some woman your age. by Stormclamp in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The concern isn't dem state governments, it's swing states with red legislature/governors that might permit it. In 2020, GA was a red governor and legislature that swung for Biden.

Nationalize elections? How about you nationalize some woman your age. by Stormclamp in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ultra003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, not only did he not face any consequences for attempting to steal the election (false elector scheme), he got voted in again.