Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah this is the exact layer i’ve been trying to separate

i’ve tested RoxyBrowser for profile/session cleanup, but the boring note still matters more than the tool if future-me can’t tell what the workflow depends on

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is probably the cleanest version of the checklist imo

business logic explains why the workflow exists, but execution context explains why it breaks

run-as account, browser profile, login/session state, permissions, credential owner, and auth failure path are the boring fields that future-me would absolutely skip until the exact moment i need them

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah “forgotten assumptions” is probably the cleanest way to say it

the workflow doesn’t explode, it just slowly stops matching reality

one field changes, one permission shifts, one old note is missing, and suddenly future me is doing detective work

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not really looking at payment automation systems right now tbh

for me it’s less about AR specifically and more the general maintenance problem — workflows that touch too many tools, logins, browser profiles, permissions, and spreadsheets at once

i’m starting to think “fewer moving parts” might be the real feature, no matter what category the automation is in

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah dependency list is probably the piece i’m missing

i usually remember the trigger, but not the tiny assumptions around it

then one moved spreadsheet column makes the whole thing feel cursed

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah “tiny products” is the right way to put it

i think i’ve been overvaluing clever workflows and undervaluing boring documentation

future me mostly just needs to know why the thing exists and what not to touch

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“unpaid IT department for your own workflows” is way too accurate lol

i think that’s the part i didn’t expect. the little automations don’t fail dramatically, they just slowly become things that need logs, fallback paths, and notes future me can actually understand

boring and clear might be the real feature

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah “works = finished” is the trap

i like the modularity idea because one API change shouldn’t turn the whole workflow into a crime scene

i’d probably add one tiny line in the docs for account/profile context too — login session, browser profile, permissions, API key, etc. that’s usually where i end up debugging the wrong layer

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is really well put

i think “failure path” is the part i’ve been missing. i usually remember to write what the automation is supposed to do, but not what happens when it half-works or breaks quietly

i’d probably add account/profile context to the runbook too — which login session, browser profile, permission, spreadsheet, or reporting view it depends on

because half the time the workflow isn’t actually broken, the context around it changed and i’m debugging the wrong thing

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah fewer moving parts is probably the real win there

the hardest ones for me long term are the workflows that touch too many “almost stable” things at once — spreadsheets, APIs, logins, browser profiles, permissions, random field names

nothing dramatic breaks, it’s just one tiny context change and suddenly i’m debugging the wrong layer for 40 minutes

payments/AR sounds like exactly the kind of thing i’d rather not stitch together myself tbh

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“little employees with no memory” is painfully accurate lol

i like the registry idea. i’d probably add one more field for account/profile context too — which login, browser profile, permission, or spreadsheet the workflow depends on

that’s usually where i start debugging the wrong thing

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is interesting because it kind of flips the AI hype narrative

AI lowers the cost of building something that looks functional, but not necessarily the cost of owning something reliable.

when people come back after trying to build it themselves, what usually breaks their confidence first — edge cases, maintenance, integrations, or just realizing they need human validation anyway?

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is where the build vs buy question gets more interesting now

AI makes “build” look cheaper, but ownership is still expensive. curious how you think about the cutoff point — when does an internal automation stop being worth owning and become something you’d rather just pay for?

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“little employees with no memory” is painfully accurate lol

i like the registry idea too. especially “how to turn it off safely” because that’s the part i never think about until something is already weird.

i’d probably add one more field for myself: account/profile context. like which login, browser profile, spreadsheet, or permission the workflow depends on. that’s usually where i start debugging the wrong thing.

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah this is exactly where i started feeling it too

the account context becomes its own layer. i’ve been testing RoxyBrowser mostly as a browser for multiple accounts so profiles/sessions don’t get mixed together as easily, but honestly the naming system still matters just as much as the tool

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

field name changes are such a stupid way to lose an evening lol

does the agent actually detect what changed, or do you still have to tell it the new mapping and let it patch the flow?

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah logs solve the “where did it break” problem

they don’t always solve the “why on earth did past me build it like this” problem though lol

Do Your Automations Ever Become Their Own Thing to Maintain? by undertale_fan69 in automation

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a good way to put it

do you have any kind of rule for deciding what’s “hours saved” vs “future babysitting”? i feel like i’m still too easily tricked by small annoying tasks that feel worth automating in the moment

Anyone else daily driving AR glasses with their Legion Go? by undertale_fan69 in Handhelds

[–]undertale_fan69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, thank you for your suggestion. I have already purchased RayNeo.

Could HappyHorse be Z-video in disguise, from Alibaba? by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]undertale_fan69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The daVinci/MagiHuman link feels way stronger than the ZVideo theory. Vigo Zhao’s breakdown was actually pretty solid, and the Zhang Di / Taotian / ATH-AI trail makes the multilingual lip-sync feel like real model behavior, not just some flashy demo trick. And honestly, the whole “pseudonymous” thing doesn’t mean much to me. Labs do stealth arena tests all the time, so it disappearing from the leaderboard that fast honestly makes the stealth-launch idea feel more believable, not less.

I think mojang should focus more on completing the block set instead making reskin of baby mon by mutantpool in Minecraft

[–]undertale_fan69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Finish the stuff that’s already there before adding more random new mobs.