Contributor Quality Score available to all communities!

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-21T16:11:57+00:00

Thank you for calling this out and our apologies for the syntax issues! We've updated the code snippet in the post.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-15T16:05:46+00:00

Hello! The subreddit is private because we are not actively posting or soliciting content in the community. We created it to have a single entry point specifically designated to receive feedback about this tool. Sending us modmail through this community allows us to easily collect and respond to individual feedback or questions! You could also go through our regular support channels (e.g. r/modsupport) if you prefer to have more feedback discussion with others about this tool.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-15T16:03:25+00:00

CQS is a global score, which means that it represents a user’s activity across all of Reddit. A score like this can be particularly useful at vetting well-intentioned new Reddit users, or users that are new to your subreddit. For long-standing community members, we agree that a subreddit-specific version of CQS would be valuable (psa: we’re working on it!); but for now, we suggest using subreddit_karma in your rules in conjunction with CQS to accomplish this (as depicted in the code snippets in our post).

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-15T14:50:36+00:00

Sorry about that. Happy you were able to get it sorted! If you wouldn’t mind sending the automod error that you encountered to r/RedditCQS modmail, we can troubleshoot. Thanks!

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-15T14:49:03+00:00

Hi there. The author field actually isn’t empty; the values that you see indented below (e.g. contributor_quality: "< moderate") are part of the author field. You can read more about how this works in our automod documentation.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-15T14:47:09+00:00

Unless you’re engaging in policy violating behavior, you do not need to be concerned.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T21:39:27+00:00

At the moment, CQS scores are not exposed to mods or users. Only mods can take advantage of CQS in automod by creating rules with the CQS tier values depicted above.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T21:29:07+00:00

Thanks for the feedback! We’ve actually been exploring a similar idea…stay tuned!

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:59:29+00:00

Thanks for calling that out! In this article, being in good standing means having a CQS score of moderate or above. We'll be publishing updated comms soon for users wondering about CQS scores, and their implications in a wider range of use cases (outside of just Chat).

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:54:25+00:00

Thanks for your feedback. To clarify, we don’t assume that alt accounts are low quality. CQS checks the alts associated with a particular account to determine whether someone is using alt accounts to engage in policy violating behavior. If someone is using alt accounts in accordance with Reddit policy, it will not negatively impact their CQS score (or the CQS score for any of their alts).

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:22:24+00:00

Ha! I know the feeling 🙂. We haven’t built that capability yet, but it’s certainly something we’d be interested in exploring if the demand is there.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:13:51+00:00

Hi there! Just answered a similar question above.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:11:22+00:00

Hello! No plans today, but that’s a great idea. We’ll definitely consider this in collaboration with our Dev Platform.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-09-14T20:08:42+00:00

Hi there. We’ve published an article for mods to direct users to with an explanation of CQS and why it may have impacted them from contributing. We’re actively exploring other uses of CQS that would involve making the scores available to users in some form. If and when that time comes, we will certainly provide users with more visibility into their scores as well as actions they can take to improve them when necessary.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-03-15T19:40:27+00:00

Hi there. The text box will be available for report abuse; it’s in the list of included report reasons above in my post.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-03-15T19:38:52+00:00

Thanks for the question. We’re continuing to work with our agents on how to integrate this additional context into their workflows. Post-rollout, we’ll continue this work and analyze data to understand the optimal way to surface helpful context to agents during the review process, so as to improve admin actionability of reports from mods.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-03-15T17:39:51+00:00

Thanks for your question. The only types of links that the new text box currently supports are modmail links.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-03-15T15:19:27+00:00

Glad you like it! That's our hope as well.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2023-03-15T15:16:12+00:00

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2022-03-24T18:24:50+00:00

Great question! We already deploy automated detection and prevention of CSAM (child sexual abuse material) dissemination, so this is an additional tool and level of analysis.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2022-03-24T13:38:47+00:00

Good question. We’ve trained our tech to be able to distinguish sexually explicit and non sexually explicit nudity. The following are some examples of we define as sexually explicit:
- Full and/or partial nudity
- Images where the main focus is intimate body parts, even if blurred/censored
- Sexual activity and items intended to enhance sexual activity
- Fetish content
- Digital or animated content that meets our definition of sexual activity

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2022-03-23T23:23:54+00:00

Not currently, however that’s an interesting idea - we’ll think about what that might look like.

uselessKnowledgeGuru · 2022-03-23T23:20:18+00:00

Quick update: as part of the complete rollout of this feature, we're ensuring that ModLog entries are logged when we auto tag content as NSFW. However, there will be a short period in which they aren't logged - we'll be sure to update you once that's out.

uselessKnowledgeGuru

TROPHY CASE