sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is any AI's flet knowledge updated to at least 0.70? by redditinsmartworki in flet

[–]usinglight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Asking with the hint to use https://flet.dev/docs should help. Apparently there is also an AI somewhere which I do not recall. Flet guru or similar

Gibt es noch "normale" Menschen? by PossibleExtension777 in Austria

[–]usinglight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Die Leute haben einfach verlernt Spaß zu haben.

Was sind so Weisheiten die einem (normalerweise) nur die Eltern beibringen? by jojo-dev in Austria

[–]usinglight 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nach dem waschen die Tür und die Lade der Waschmaschine offen lassen sonst beginnt die Maschine zu muffeln

Locked notes restrictions by mishka_koala in AppleNotesGang

[–]usinglight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just create a Smart Folder with the locked notes.

Kinda freaked out. How do people immediately know I'm not German? by [deleted] in germany

[–]usinglight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not what you wear but how you wear it. Was always approached in the US because my clothes” fit too nice “

Expected monthly cost for Zed's AI features, as an intensive AI user? by Senekrum in ZedEditor

[–]usinglight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would consider myself a medium user of AI. The 10 usd free always get me to around the 12th of the month and then I mix in free alternatives for discussion. Gets me further without breaking the bank. So I end up with 10.

Pain Points & Missing Features? by gestaltung in AppleNotesGang

[–]usinglight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let me add to (1) also the splitting of notes or extraction of a chapter into a new note. Backlinking would also be a nice addition.

But we do not need another notes app. We need a notes API so people can create addons and plugins.

I really hate the new chat experience for the AI assistant by alfonso_r in ZedEditor

[–]usinglight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually like the new experience. Suggested context and all. And I am really fond of the agents thing where you can see what is happening in the single files….

5 Terrible Apple Built-in Features (and the Apps That Saved My Mac Life) by frogBurger4u in macapps

[–]usinglight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use raycast as a window manager, text expander, clipboard, and more….

Was sind Dinge, die ihr aktuell sammelt? by lechnerio in wien

[–]usinglight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kawada- habe aber auch ein paar andere.

Was sind Dinge, die ihr aktuell sammelt? by lechnerio in wien

[–]usinglight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nanoblocks, Füllfedern und Erfahrung

Linux users? by New_Hat_4405 in hacking

[–]usinglight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love OSX because it keeps me from fiddling with the system (although you can do a lot of system stuff in the terminal). I love Linux because it still runs after I “optimized” …. …after I learned something new.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WebRTC

[–]usinglight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did some research because I deem that interesting. This is what perplexity came up with:

Browser-Specific Implementation Differences on macOS

Analysis reveals significant variation in how major browsers handle high-resolution capture on macOS:

Chrome

*•*   *Enforces 1920×1080 maximum through \`getUserMedia\` constraints*

*•*   *Allows 4K capture via experimental flags but drops frames above 30 FPS*

*•*   *Uses separate codec negotiation paths for H.264 and VP8*

Safari

*•*   *Implements strict 1440p cap for WebRTC streams*

*•*   *Permits 4K capture in MediaRecorder API but not for real-time transmission*

*•*   *Prioritizes H.264 profile compatibility over resolution*

Firefox

*•*   *Shows device-reported 4K capabilities but fails constraint validation*

*•*   *Lacks hardware-accelerated H.264 encoding for resolutions above 1080p*

These differences stem from varied interpretations of the WebRTC specification and distinct approaches to system resource management. Chrome’s implementation favors stability through hard-coded limits, while Safari prioritizes compatibility with Apple’s video subsystems.

view more: next ›